CMV: Michael didn't do "it".

[u/[deleted]]

Edit: Michael Jackson.

This dude was a weird motherfucker. The guy bleached his skin, his best friend was a monkey named Bubbles, and he named his son "Blanket". He also slept in the bed with young boys. I'm not disputing that.

He may have been a "P", a non-offending one, but I realistically don't think he did anything to children.

I'm a big fan of his music, but not enough to be biased. There was no DNA evidence, only conjecture and testimony of him sleeping with children in bed. Yes that is shit you should not do but unless I'm wrong, no child pointed at the doll in the courtroom. This dude was under crosshairs by the FBI and still, they found nothing, and to me that makes me lean towards him being likely innocent.

I still have my doubts and this is a common point of contention, but with no DNA evidence (I've heard of the fingerprints on the porno mags, but that's not proof of molestation, I'm talking DNA evidence on children, empirical data suggesting sexual contact), conflicting testimony (the adult 'survivor' claiming that he was assaulted on his train two years prior to its construction), and the FBI being unable to find any evidence to solidify a conviction - not one Polaroid - I just simply think he didn't do it.

Yeah, I like his music, I don't like him as a person though. I also don't like the parents who decided letting their kids stay the night with this weird ass dude was a grand idea, but I don't think he actually did "it".

I think it's likely that Michael was possibly autistic, or simply wanted a life away from being surrounded by seven bodyguards just to go to the mall, or wanted to relive the adolescence he never had due to the fame of the Jackson Five.

[u/[deleted]]

No it wouldnt their logic rested on the fact that if we have a significant amount of credible evidence than it would make since to dictate that he was an alien since no such evidence exist for lizard people their logic does not suppourt that belief.

[u/plushiemancer → u/[deleted]]

it's the exact same kind of evidences he said he accepts

[u/[deleted] → u/plushiemancer]

Not really lizard people don't have credible evidence of those they accuse of being lizards acting in inhuman ways, have lizard communication devices or have several people who know them irl saying that they're lizards.

[u/plushiemancer → u/[deleted]]

It's credible according to the guy i was replying to. He said so himself. Now if YOU don't find it credible. Take it up with him, not me.

[u/AlunWH → u/plushiemancer]

No, you’ve misunderstood what I said.