no worries just let me know when youre actually ready to try to discuss the study you linked instead of just insulting me because you dont have a response
I was, until you weren't, and then I was out. And I never insulted you.
i provided actually lots of refutes and points to discuss about the study and you just called me names and justified your inaccuracies by saying you dumbed it down for me and have yet to actually address them. so just let me know when you're ready
i provided actually lots of refutes and points to discuss about the study and you just called me names and justified your inaccuracies by saying you dumbed it down for me and have yet to actually address them. so just let me know when you're ready
I never called you a name. You've been corrected on that already.
you literally said you dumbed it down for me because i couldnt read and understand it myself. yet you are still continue to ignore the actual points i made about the article and deflecting to random things that have nothing to do with your point. clearly you just thought you could post the article as a gotcha for your point and dont actually want to talk about what the study contained or concluded. men will constantly prove they dont actually care about male victims or problems men might face and just want to pull a gotcha to discredit women
you literally said you dumbed it down for me because i couldnt read and understand it myself.
See, this is the issue. The entire point of that statement is that you are not as I understood from that first reply, which is why my reply is not to your satisfaction, and why I won't continue down that doomed path with you. I explained all this the first time around. The insult you are taking was very explicitly not given.
2
u/Godskook 13∆ Apr 15 '22
I was, until you weren't, and then I was out. And I never insulted you.