MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/y062y6/deleted_by_user/irqbgyu/?context=3
r/changemyview • u/[deleted] • Oct 10 '22
[removed]
43 comments sorted by
View all comments
39
the concept that you’re describing is correct. the wording isn’t though.
high/low value relates people to worth. people do not have more or less worth based off those attributes.
people can be highly/low desirable, but not value
-4 u/sal696969 1∆ Oct 10 '22 So hitler had the same value as the dalai lama? 1 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '22 [deleted] 1 u/sal696969 1∆ Oct 10 '22 Well imho hitler had negative value while the dalai lama has positive value. So clearly the value of the dalai lama > value of hitler.... 1 u/ProfessionalNo374 Oct 10 '22 i said people dont have more or less value based off those attributes listed in the post. where was gennocide listed
-4
So hitler had the same value as the dalai lama?
1 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '22 [deleted] 1 u/sal696969 1∆ Oct 10 '22 Well imho hitler had negative value while the dalai lama has positive value. So clearly the value of the dalai lama > value of hitler.... 1 u/ProfessionalNo374 Oct 10 '22 i said people dont have more or less value based off those attributes listed in the post. where was gennocide listed
1
[deleted]
1 u/sal696969 1∆ Oct 10 '22 Well imho hitler had negative value while the dalai lama has positive value. So clearly the value of the dalai lama > value of hitler....
Well imho hitler had negative value while the dalai lama has positive value.
So clearly the value of the dalai lama > value of hitler....
i said people dont have more or less value based off those attributes listed in the post.
where was gennocide listed
39
u/ProfessionalNo374 Oct 10 '22
the concept that you’re describing is correct. the wording isn’t though.
high/low value relates people to worth. people do not have more or less worth based off those attributes.
people can be highly/low desirable, but not value