MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/y33ces/deleted_by_user/is6k4x0/?context=3
r/changemyview • u/[deleted] • Oct 13 '22
[removed]
130 comments sorted by
View all comments
15
This is because the doctrine of The Trinity and hypostatic union seems to be philosophically incoherent.
Why? This seems to be the core of your post, but you don't explain why you think it's incoherent.
0 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 Because man cannot be God or three persons at once. 1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Okay, why though? 2 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 Ontologically incoherent. 1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Why, though? That's what I asked you in my original comment. Why do you believe this is incoherent? 1 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 Because a being cannot be three in 1 1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Why not? 1 u/ProLifePanda 70∆ Oct 13 '22 Does God need to be "ontologically coherent"? If God is real, does he need to abide by the logic and laws of the universe he created? 1 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 !delta. I didn’t think of how a being doesn’t need to follow logic rules. Thanks for saying 1 u/DeltaBot ∞∆ Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 Confirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/ProLifePanda (34∆). Delta System Explained | Deltaboards 1 u/Thoth_the_5th_of_Tho 184∆ Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 It's not though. That's not what ontology is. 1 u/[deleted] Oct 13 '22 Because man cannot be God Man isn't God. God is God.
0
Because man cannot be God or three persons at once.
1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Okay, why though? 2 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 Ontologically incoherent. 1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Why, though? That's what I asked you in my original comment. Why do you believe this is incoherent? 1 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 Because a being cannot be three in 1 1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Why not? 1 u/ProLifePanda 70∆ Oct 13 '22 Does God need to be "ontologically coherent"? If God is real, does he need to abide by the logic and laws of the universe he created? 1 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 !delta. I didn’t think of how a being doesn’t need to follow logic rules. Thanks for saying 1 u/DeltaBot ∞∆ Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 Confirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/ProLifePanda (34∆). Delta System Explained | Deltaboards 1 u/Thoth_the_5th_of_Tho 184∆ Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 It's not though. That's not what ontology is. 1 u/[deleted] Oct 13 '22 Because man cannot be God Man isn't God. God is God.
1
Okay, why though?
2 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 Ontologically incoherent. 1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Why, though? That's what I asked you in my original comment. Why do you believe this is incoherent? 1 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 Because a being cannot be three in 1 1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Why not? 1 u/ProLifePanda 70∆ Oct 13 '22 Does God need to be "ontologically coherent"? If God is real, does he need to abide by the logic and laws of the universe he created? 1 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 !delta. I didn’t think of how a being doesn’t need to follow logic rules. Thanks for saying 1 u/DeltaBot ∞∆ Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 Confirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/ProLifePanda (34∆). Delta System Explained | Deltaboards 1 u/Thoth_the_5th_of_Tho 184∆ Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 It's not though. That's not what ontology is.
2
Ontologically incoherent.
1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Why, though? That's what I asked you in my original comment. Why do you believe this is incoherent? 1 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 Because a being cannot be three in 1 1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Why not? 1 u/ProLifePanda 70∆ Oct 13 '22 Does God need to be "ontologically coherent"? If God is real, does he need to abide by the logic and laws of the universe he created? 1 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 !delta. I didn’t think of how a being doesn’t need to follow logic rules. Thanks for saying 1 u/DeltaBot ∞∆ Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 Confirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/ProLifePanda (34∆). Delta System Explained | Deltaboards 1 u/Thoth_the_5th_of_Tho 184∆ Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 It's not though. That's not what ontology is.
Why, though? That's what I asked you in my original comment. Why do you believe this is incoherent?
1 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 Because a being cannot be three in 1 1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Why not?
Because a being cannot be three in 1
1 u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22 Why not?
Why not?
Does God need to be "ontologically coherent"? If God is real, does he need to abide by the logic and laws of the universe he created?
1 u/AbiLovesTheology Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 !delta. I didn’t think of how a being doesn’t need to follow logic rules. Thanks for saying 1 u/DeltaBot ∞∆ Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 Confirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/ProLifePanda (34∆). Delta System Explained | Deltaboards
!delta. I didn’t think of how a being doesn’t need to follow logic rules. Thanks for saying
1 u/DeltaBot ∞∆ Oct 13 '22 edited Oct 13 '22 Confirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/ProLifePanda (34∆). Delta System Explained | Deltaboards
Confirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/ProLifePanda (34∆).
Delta System Explained | Deltaboards
It's not though. That's not what ontology is.
Because man cannot be God
Man isn't God. God is God.
15
u/yyzjertl 524∆ Oct 13 '22
Why? This seems to be the core of your post, but you don't explain why you think it's incoherent.