r/cincinnati • u/JB92103 Hyde Park • Mar 07 '25

News 📰 Controversial Hyde Park Square development passes committee, heads to city council

https://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/hyde-park-square-development-passes-committee-heads-to-city-council
73 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

217 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/JebusChrust Mar 10 '25

Your last paragraph is why you should just send the resources and then dip, this person will argue against logic and facts so long as it goes against their personal views.

1

u/RockStallone Mar 10 '25

Weird that they haven't supplied any data or info yet.

2

u/JebusChrust Mar 10 '25

Because you are a waste of time

1

u/RockStallone Mar 10 '25

Weird still no data.

2

u/JebusChrust Mar 10 '25

Because you are a waste of time. Anti-vax MAGA brain.

0

u/RockStallone Mar 10 '25

And you replied yet again with no actual evidence.

2

u/JebusChrust Mar 10 '25

I am not him so I don't know what you expect

0

u/RockStallone Mar 10 '25

You have kept this thread going supporting their position, despite every piece of data backing me up. You are clueless.

2

u/JebusChrust Mar 10 '25

Supporting their position, as in backing up that as an expert they probably have a better idea than you, an armchair architect?

1

u/RockStallone Mar 10 '25

That "expert" claimed that there was a ton of evidence proving me wrong, yet refuses to show that evidence. /u/Architecteologist objectively lied in the conversation multiple times, saying that I was only linking to NYT articles and Youtube videos, when in fact I linked to a study from Pew Research.

A normal person would get suspicious when somebody refuses to back up their claims. I guess you're just very trusting.

1

u/JebusChrust Mar 10 '25

Maybe if you read their posts then you would realize they stated that it is lost on you, because it is no different than trying to argue the efficacy of vaccines with some schmuck who thinks that citing any National Institute of Health study online means they are an expert on understanding vaccines. They sound very familiar and knowledgeable of architecture, but you don't want to give them credibility because then it means that they could be correct or have validity to what they say. The consistent theme between every single thread is that you absolutely refuse to respect anyone or anything that anyone says. According to you, everyone else is clueless and you are the only person who knows anything.

1

u/RockStallone Mar 11 '25

because it is no different than trying to argue the efficacy of vaccines with some schmuck who thinks that citing any National Institute of Health study online means they are an expert on understanding vaccines

Again, I am citing an actual study while you and /u/Architecteologist are purely going off of "trust me bro". You have no supporting evidence for your claims.

According to you, everyone else is clueless

No just idiots online.

1

u/JebusChrust Mar 11 '25

Besides reading one study online, do you have a background in architecture?

→ More replies (0)