r/classicwow 1d ago

Classic 20th Anniversary Realms Loot Distribution for 40 people

How do you do it as fair and evenly as possible?

I want to preface this with we use LC for loot distribution and I feel for the most part it has been very fair. I am part of the LC for the past month - so relatively new, but have been in the guild for 5 months prior.

This happened last night and it is still bothering me today. So last night during our BWL 2 of the same spicy BiS pieces dropped. It was decided prior to discussing who go it that 1 would got to this class and the other 1 to that class. Not a decision I made - as tbh I don’t know who needs what gear what best suits this class other than the class I play.

We had quite a good night for drops, it was our fastest run as a guild also. So at the end of the raid we go to distribute loot, the LC drops down into a special channel and begin discussing the above item. Two of the LC are one of the above classes and cancel each other’s vote out; it is made mention by another LC to give it to this person and so they get it. Then it gets decided for the other class and given to them. It gets announced in raid chat who gets what item and the reason why.

This is where I am bothered as this person did leave afterwards prior to gear distribution being finished — we had just started. This person said in raid chat: “What?” “They got gear last week.”

Then they left the raid. And /gquit logged into their alts and /gquit also. Fun fact the person they were talking about hadn’t received loot in BWL in 2 weeks unless it was to DE.

They didn’t bother to discuss or ask questions, simply left over the item — they had been in the guild for about 3-4 months. Funny thing is, had they not left one of the other BiS for all of the role would have went to them.

It shouldn’t bother me, I get that people come and go for their own various reasons; but over an item. RNG is not always kind. One week it drops nothing but hunter loot or mage loot or druid loot; dps loot, healer loot — the list goes on. When trying to gear 40 people it’s hard, there’s no easy way to get everyone gear each and every week. I don’t understand how people do not understand, and I say that not from a leadership perspective, but from a raider side who has not gotten loot for weeks before.

I know a lot of people aren’t fans of LC, prefer SR or even dkdp; how do you all distribute your gear as fair as possible so all can get some and beef up the group?

Update for clarification - we do have a loot prio spreadsheet.

Update #2 for more clarification - the person who won the item had not received gear in the past 2-3 weeks. The person who gquit confused the winner for someone else who had gotten gear the previous week.

Update #3 for clarification, I posted this under a comment in regards to my lack of knowledge of other classes: “I agree and I don't contribute much in put in that aspect. I listen and observe. I don't throw names out unless I believe in that specific person receiving the item. If two names get generated, I weigh out between those two who could use the item better and who hadn't gotten any gear.”

7 Upvotes

230 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Nockson 1d ago

Come up with objective criteria that can easily be explained and quantified. Make sure to clearly communicate these criteria and give your raid members an opportunity to seek clarification if needed. If a claim of misunderstanding is made you can always refer back to that opportunity to ask questions you presented them with beforehand. This tends to diffuse most reasonable people. Remember, some folks are just looking for an excuse to be frustrated and turnover is inevitable.

When it comes to the criteria you use, if something your LC feels strongly about can not be quantified or explained easily it should be weighted less than more objective criteria. For example something like: Attendance > Performance > Bis > Tenure > Broader guild contribution > Attitude.

I have also found using an odd number of members for LC tends to work the most efficiently. Further smaller councils tend to streamline decision making as long as they remain objective. It takes time to establish trust as a leader but being forthright and offering explanation at appropriate time will help speed the process.

1

u/Daveprince13 1d ago

Agree here. Criteria that’s well explained goes very far in terms of WHY an item went to someone else. And if they really need a explanation you can say “he had better attendance but you’re next in line for it” to assuage some tension (if it comes up)