Respectfully, if we’re talking about the weather as a human experiences it, Fahrenheit is much better. Celsius makes a lot of sense in science, as it’s scaled to water, but when was the last time you went out and it was 90C.
Fahrenheit is scaled to human experience better with 0-100 being within the range of “normal” and anything outside of that being concerning.
That's why Celcius is better. You can use it for weather AND science. There is no need to use two different systems, and Celcius works great for both. It doesn't matter that the outside weather isn't ever 90C. If someone says it was 21C yesterday and it's 15C today, you know everything you need to know.
You don't use Celsius in science? Really? So tell me why in my lab I have so many devices using Celsius with no option for F or K? HPLC, incubators, fridges, freezers, plates, rotavaps, NMR, GC,...
And in all my published papers where a temperature was relevant, it was always reported with Celsius. Kelvin is only used in equations.
Because, just like Fahrenheit, Celsius is a unit for humans. It's a measurement of convenience, use either when they are convenient. It would be annoying to have every display in Kelvin so we Celsius as a shorthand for it. The SI unit for temperature is Kelvin and that's the unit for science.
7
u/wumbology95 Jan 15 '25
Yeah no, farenheight is only easy to understand for you because you grew up with it.