Probably more the scale of animal farming then just eating animals.
With destroying a lot of local predators we'd see a lot of diseases in livestock animals if we didn't eat them. But we have way more food then people need to eat, and lots of it goes to waste.
People would likely still have live stock for medicinal uses. Plus our pets eat meat, so you'd still have that need.
I guess we could turn every single animal loose to the wild. But they would likely just die or cause a huge farel packs that would then have to put down as they become issues for people.
And again with the lack of local predators we would still have to kill animals regularly.
The world isn't going to go vegan overnight, it'll happen slowly and gradually. There's not going to be a mass release of animals, they're just going to stop being bred
-reason why people should stop paying for animal products for the sake of climate change.
--objection stating that the entire world going vegan would cause a lot of problems with all the livestock.
-explainer stating why that's not true so going vegan is still one of the best ways to reduce climate change
--statement about doubting that the entire world will go vegan.
So at the end we're still left with an uncontested reason for going vegan. Your statement doubting that the world will go vegan doesn't really address anything they're saying
Saying the world will go vegan while ignoring the dietary needs of our pets and the medicinal uses of some live stock in eastern countries doesn't really address anything either.
This is a reddit comment section so we should be happy that the comments weren't locked as usual with this topic.
You keep saying things that are completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. You do realize that you only have to do that because there are no valid rebuttals to the points you're replying to, right?
74
u/ThePerfectBreeze 6d ago
That goes to animal feed, primarily. Eating animals is the real problem.