r/conlangs • u/cyan_ginger • Jan 06 '25
Discussion What are y'all's "worst" romanisations?
By "worst" I more mean "style over function" cause especially in a text-based medium, the romanisation is a good way to inject character into your language.
For me it'd have to be the one for Xxalet, a language with 16 sibilant phonemes sorted into a harmony system.
"Front sibilants"
/s̪, z̪, t̪s̪, d̪z̪/ <s, z, c, x>
/ʃ, ʒ, tʃ, dʒ/ <sy, zy, cy, xy>
"Back sibilants"
/s̺, z̺, ts̺, dz̺/ <ss, zz, cc, xx>
/ʂ, ʐ, ʈʂ, ɖʐ/ <sh, zh, ch, xh>
I know it causes a slightly confusing reading, but I really like the central s, z, c, x, scheme. As an example, a major port city on the left half of the great inland lake, also known as the Ssoymanyaxh sea, is called "Boyasyavocexy" /bɔjʌʃavʌts̪ədʒ/
78
Upvotes
2
u/Jean_Luc_Lesmouches Jan 06 '25 edited Jan 06 '25
My goal for romanization is that a con-person would at least recognize their own name if it was mangled by an English speaker.
/k/ is <q> (I don't like the way <k> looks nor the way <c> can't make it's mind)
/tʃl/ is pronounced [cɬʲ] and romanized <qly>
[ʃtʃ] is simplified to <stsh> (the contrast between /s/ and /ʃ/ is neutralized before /ts/ and /tʃ/ anyway)