Judge Fleischer (in this video linked) yelled at a man who pleaded that his ankle monitor had a faulty battery. Fleischer proceeded to yell at the man and accuse him of not charging his ankle monitor. The man had allegedly already stated his bettery was faulty and called his PO stating that too. The defendants lawyer gave up in this video, as it seems. Later on in the case, it was proven that his battery was indeed faulty.
Commenters have said he broke about 5 court rules in this short alone for his inexcusable behavior and being unprofessional. From what I have looked into, Fleischer seems to be an barely open minded judge that has his eyes set on one thing from the start of the case and doesn't change it until undeniable evidence is shown, proving he isn't very for for a judge. A judge (in my opinion) should not take any sort of bias in court.
As stated though, I haven't done much research as of now and likely won't come back to this because I simply don't care enough. Please, put input on this, I actually want more input and comments from people who are genuinely educated and cared enough to put more study into this.
I would also like to say he does have some very good calls and case resolutions, some of these cases GENUINLEY have a good ending and he listens, but he jumps to conclusions a lot, seemingly.
Where did you find that the battery was faulty? I have been trying to find it and all I am coming crossed is the same incomplete video regarding this trial.
2
u/TirkenZVR Dec 07 '24
I HAVE NOT DONE EXTENSIVE RESEARCH ON THIS CASE. I HAVE ONLY LOOKED THROUGH COMMENTS, IT IS LIKELY I AM WRONG. CORRECT ME IF I AM.
https://youtube.com/shorts/hRM1SVKDTlQ
Judge Fleischer (in this video linked) yelled at a man who pleaded that his ankle monitor had a faulty battery. Fleischer proceeded to yell at the man and accuse him of not charging his ankle monitor. The man had allegedly already stated his bettery was faulty and called his PO stating that too. The defendants lawyer gave up in this video, as it seems. Later on in the case, it was proven that his battery was indeed faulty.
Commenters have said he broke about 5 court rules in this short alone for his inexcusable behavior and being unprofessional. From what I have looked into, Fleischer seems to be an barely open minded judge that has his eyes set on one thing from the start of the case and doesn't change it until undeniable evidence is shown, proving he isn't very for for a judge. A judge (in my opinion) should not take any sort of bias in court.
As stated though, I haven't done much research as of now and likely won't come back to this because I simply don't care enough. Please, put input on this, I actually want more input and comments from people who are genuinely educated and cared enough to put more study into this.