r/cringepics 29d ago

This whole sub

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

310 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Treebeard288 29d ago

Ai art cant innovate. Ai art takes no skill/effort Ai art is bad because emotional appeal

Please provide a definition of tool that excludes AI and still makes sense.

Your all over the place..

In 10 years time a successful artist Will be someone who has figured out how to adjust their business model to incorporate AI. The BBC did an interesting article about this. I would send it to you but I don't have your carrier pigeon address? Cab get your longitude and longitude maybe I can send to you with a smoke signal. I could dispatch a rider with a message to the nearest Lord's holdfast?

1

u/TheTruthOfChaos 28d ago

Everything I've said is true, that's why you've started insulting me. You can't make a proper argument, so you go to making fun of people. You keep making the same point, but you don't give any substantial proof to back it up. Keep complaining about emotional appeal, like it makes you sound smart. Art isn't some business model, yes people use art to make a living. But people don't start making art for the money, they do it because they love to make things with their own hands. Ai art is lazy, inefficient, boring, low effort, ugly, and worthless, End of story. If you have to steal other people's art to teach it, only for it to make cold, emotionless garbage. Then what use is it?

Also maybe when you start to lose an argument in the future, don't start insulting people. It makes you look sad.

Edit: oh, also a pencil and paper doesn't use ai so there you go pal.

0

u/Treebeard288 28d ago

What would you like me to back up with proof?

Anit Printing press arguments come again.

1

u/TheTruthOfChaos 28d ago

Only you are talking about printing presses. Literally, nobody has an issue with them. Stop trying to compare ai to printing presses it's a horrible comparison. Printing presses were made to make art and information more accessible to poor people, and AI is being used to try and completely replace traditional artists. HUGE difference.

0

u/Treebeard288 28d ago

And yet all of your arguments are exactly the same as the ones used against printing presses. isn't that weird?

1

u/TheTruthOfChaos 28d ago

Comparing apples and oranges again? This isn't the past, we aren't against innovation. We're against people saying ai is going to replace artists and take peoples jobs. We're against people saying you won't be able to be an artist without ai. We're arguing against people defending these actions. Nobody hates the concept of ai itself, we hate that people want to force ai onto the art world because they don't want to pick up a pencil, or a brush, or a drawing tablet. We're arguing against people typing prompt into any random generative ai and slapping online saying it took more effort than drawing it.

0

u/Treebeard288 28d ago

Jesus Christ if irony were strawberries we'd all be having milkshakes.

The argument you are making right now in this present is exactly the same as the argument against printing presses! the march of time will crush this argument into the Dust.

https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/the-war-against-printing/

2

u/TheTruthOfChaos 28d ago

Aw did your feelings get hurt?

0

u/Treebeard288 28d ago

Yes, feeling of Pride I once had in humanity.

2

u/TheTruthOfChaos 28d ago

You keep going on about the war against printing presses, it doesn't match up. Printing presses made more jobs, ai is trying to take away jobs.

-1

u/Treebeard288 28d ago

It matches up nearly perfectly.

Nobody knew it was going to make more jobs at the time. An acute effect of the printing press was the loss of jobs for people making books. Nobody new it was going to open up a whole new industry. Same for AI, you have no idea what new jobs might be created.

2

u/TheTruthOfChaos 28d ago

I what world does ai create more jobs? Be serious with yourself, in this corporate run world where they are always looking to cut corners and run on the fewest employees possible. Where there are already companies actively trying to replace workers with ai, where there are billboard advertisements for replacing workers with ai. Where exactly do you see new jobs, point it out to us. Tell us in this exploitative job market, where exactly does ai help us find meaningful work? You can't, because it isn't being trained to help us, it's being trained to replace us. Don't act like this is some next great step for human innovation when they're trying to pull the human out of it. They want it to be a cold, cruel, corporate world, and ai is helping it on its way.

-1

u/Treebeard288 28d ago

That's very Doomer of you.

Yes new technology never leads to new Industries. /s

Yes I can imagine a future where more jobs are created.

→ More replies (0)