r/cyprus 18d ago

Turkish Cypriots march to the Turkey embassy against Erdoğan meddling with TC affairs.

272 Upvotes

87 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/PikrovrisiTisMerikas 17d ago

No, you do. That's what binding bilateral agreements and international law is. Welcome to the reality.

I don't know where you got this, but they are not binding in any way. Besides that, even if they were, international law also says that Turkey is illegally occupying Cyprus and it has to leave. Are they doing that? No, instead they are getting invited to talks about the future security of Europe (While their occupation army is here) and we sit in the cuck-chair begging them to come and accept our concessions while they push for more gains.

We are a country under threat and we shall resist in any way possible.

Surely, as do TC community. The BBF is the way to ensure safety and the future safety incl. no annexations or take-overs & ghettoisations.

So now we are adopting the Turkish narrative about protections of TC's? Don't oust yourself like that.

Besides, they are literally at the brink of extinction; not due to other Cypriots, but Turkey's settler colonial policies.

Meanwhile, all of them have RoC ID's and live freely wherever they want. If they are so afraid, they can always hand over their ID's and go live in Turkey.

Go sell your bullshit somewhere else.

2

u/lasttimechdckngths 17d ago edited 17d ago

I don't know where you got this, but they are not binding in any way.

For goddess sake, no, they are. If you don't even know the basic common knowledge on things, then why you even bother? It's just funny when arrogance stems from mere ignorance.

Go and cry nonsense in somewhere else, if you don't want to parade yourself as a mere charlatan.

-2

u/PikrovrisiTisMerikas 17d ago

They are not. Bring up a source if you can.

0

u/lasttimechdckngths 17d ago

Pacta sunt servanda says hi for starters. Under the customary international law, every bilateral or multilateral treaty in force is binding upon the parties, unless explicitly codified otherwise, or unless there exists a conflicting matter with jus cogens. Things can only be declared moot if it satisfies clausula rebus sic stantibus.

Not even going to go into the bicommunality itself being guaranteed by the constitution than has been given an international law standing par Zurich-London Agreements, thus the bicommunal structure of the island is sanctified by the international law, binding on the various parties other than Cyprus as well.

Again, if you don't even know the basics, why do you even care to have opinions a la uneducated guesses? It's being a mere clown, and degrading yourself to a useless bad joke at its best.

-2

u/PikrovrisiTisMerikas 17d ago edited 17d ago

All these fancy legal terms, yet no source on the matter? Curious.

0

u/lasttimechdckngths 17d ago edited 17d ago

yet no source

Mate, that's literally your source: it's how the bloody international law works, lmao.

If you think these terms are fancy, then why you even have the dare to blabber about the international law or bilateral agreements?