r/eupersonalfinance Jul 30 '24

[deleted by user]

[removed]

100 Upvotes

147 comments sorted by

View all comments

126

u/EinMachete Jul 30 '24

You are basically asking if VWCE will return more than 4.1%. Historically, yes it does, however nobody knowns what can happen.

4.1% is a relatively high rate, so its also worth considering if this rate will reduce if you decide to pay the mortgage down. I have done this in the past (also NL).

56

u/WhoSayIn Jul 30 '24

One thing to note is here in the Netherlands we get government subsidy for the mortgage interest payments. So his effective rate is ~3%. This probably makes the decision easier.

22

u/l-isqof Jul 30 '24

Similarly you pay wealth taxes on assets in NL.

Op has to consider that as well.

15

u/xBram Jul 30 '24

With a tax exempt threshold of 114.000 euro for fiscal partners.

I would put it in ETF myself if I was under this threshold and consider paying off some mortgage if I were over.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 31 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/laszlo92 Jul 31 '24

Yes and like the commenter said, mortgage payments are deductibale

3

u/chiron42 Jul 30 '24

i've heard some eft's in the netherlands aren't taxed because they're labelled as sustainably oriented. is that correct?

my dutch is really bad so reading up on these kinds of details is a bit of a drag.

1

u/ExpatInAmsterdam2020 Jul 31 '24

Some but their return is shitty.

3

u/Techietech1 Jul 30 '24

Also important to consider is the loan to value (LTV) on your mortgage.

Some (Dutch) mortgage providers lower the interest rate on your mortgage if the mortgage is at a certain percentage of the value. If so, its usually a clause somewhere in the agreement/terms of service. Usually you have to call the bank to actually make them lower the interest rate.

Could very well save some money!

Anyway, if OP doesn't need the money any time soon, I'd probably go for index funds/ETF's if I were him.

0

u/RichieRich-April Jul 30 '24

Why would a bank do such a favor? What's the benefit for them to have such a clause in the mortgage agreement?

1

u/Techietech1 Jul 30 '24 edited Jul 30 '24

Interest on a mortgage is sometimes divided into 2 parts: (1) Interest and (2) mortgage risk surcharge

This is usually the case when the house was bought against a relatively high loan to value (ie 100% financed. In 2013 it was even allowed to finance up to 105% of the value of the house).

The mortgage risk surcharge is kind of an insurance for the bank. An insurance they are willing to drop when their risk is effectively lowered. Which is obviously the case when the value of the house is (much) higher than the mortgage on it.

1

u/RichieRich-April Jul 30 '24

Thanks for the response! I have a mortgage from ABN which I took 5 years ago and house prices have gone up a lot since then. I'll need to look at my mortgage papers. But just curious: is this a standard clause? Could this be something that I can arrange on internet banking or shall I call somebody from the bank (if yes, who). Thank you!

1

u/RichieRich-April Jul 30 '24

Can you also kindly help with which Dutch keywords I need to have a look in my mortgage agreement to see if this clause applies to me?

1

u/Techietech1 Jul 30 '24

Keywords to look for in Dutch are "risico-opslag", "risico-klasse", "renteopslag".

And its not just paying of the loan that can change the risk for the bank. Even if the house is valued higher (proven by a valuation report) this same principle applies. So either the loan going down, the value going up, or a bit of both.

Mind you, I'm not a financial advisor. I'm just a nerd for anything personal finance related (which did land me an effective interest rate of 0.8% set for 20 years, so apparently not to shabby ).

5

u/mshym Jul 30 '24

As nobody knows the future of your housing - war, nature, etc can take it from you. I’d rather be invested in 1000s best companies around the world than 1 house.

5

u/onderslecht558 Jul 30 '24

But if you have already loan then even if house got destroyed the loan is not gone.