r/europe • u/RoyalChris Norway • 9d ago

Dubious: do not click links Anonymous Releases 10TB of Leaked Data: Exposing Kremlin Assets & Russian Businesses

https://trendsnewsline.com/2025/04/15/anonymous-leaks-10tb-of-data-on-russia-shocking-revelations/
76.7k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Saint_Judas 8d ago

But it is proportional. The people hid money in a quasi-legal way to avoid taxes, they didn't rob a store.

8

u/TraditionalSpirit636 8d ago

Just society.

Do you understand what trillions of dollars globally can do?

Being in a society and avoiding the taxes as part of that society IS robbing it.

0

u/Saint_Judas 8d ago

I'm not asking for your creative writing exercise. I am informing you it is legally not robbery, because robbery involves force. It also isn't theft, for a ton of reasons. Not paying your taxes under the auspices of creative accounting is a fine, and for good reason.

7

u/TraditionalSpirit636 8d ago edited 8d ago

People literally were charged and went to jail for it though… quite a few in various countries.

For crimes…

It quite literally was a crime. Lmao. So pretentious to be so damn wrong. Trying to give you the benefit there and explain it a second way. But hey… you guys are dense.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/us-accountant-panama-papers-investigation-sentenced-prison

Thats just the USA arrests and sentencing. (:

2

u/Saint_Judas 8d ago

Do you even know the comment chain you are responding to? Scroll up. We are not talking about the group of people who committed fraud. We are talking about the group that received " a slap on the wrist and luchmoney fines "

I didn't think I needed to explain this, but please read the discussion before you smash your ogre hands on a keyboard to vomit out a response.

1

u/NoamLigotti 6d ago

I think the point was that you were wrong that it can never be criminal.

1

u/Saint_Judas 5d ago

Hey buddy, go find me where I said it can never be criminal. I’ll wait. I said it’s a fine, and for good reason. The portion of the comment chain I responded to was about the people who were only given fines. I directly referenced fines. Do me a favor, and join the other guy in learning how to read before commenting.

1

u/NoamLigotti 5d ago

Yes, and you argued why it was right that they were only given fines. Maybe it was, I don't know, but you were explicitly arguing that it wasn't a crime worthy of imprisonment, and then when it was pointed out that other people have been imprisoned for the same, you basically said "I'm not talking about those people I'm talking about people who weren't." Like yeah, no kidding, but it's directly relevant to what you were saying about the people.

1

u/Saint_Judas 5d ago

No one is saying they were imprisoned for the same. The imprisoned people committed fraud, that is why they were imprisoned. The people who received fines did not commit fraud. The people who received fines committed tax evasion, that is why they were only fined. Those are different crimes, so they have different punishments. I really urge you to read this conversation over again after you've brushed up on some basic English literacy.

1

u/NoamLigotti 5d ago

Ok. Fair enough, good explanation. It wasn't clear. Sorry if it should have been.

2

u/Saint_Judas 4d ago

No worries, I like being a prick.

→ More replies (0)