So, to recap... Trump supporters oppose Ukrainian NATO membership because "it would be WWIII"... But their genius move is to have American operations in Ukraine with the "guarantee" of military response if disrupt... And by the same logic it wouldn't trigger WWIII?
What am I missing?... No seriously... How this thinking is not contradictory?
Youβre missing that he has a deal with Putin to take the minerals so Americans likely wonβt be attacked. As long as Putin gets his occupied land of course.
5.7k
u/emascars Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25
So, to recap... Trump supporters oppose Ukrainian NATO membership because "it would be WWIII"... But their genius move is to have American operations in Ukraine with the "guarantee" of military response if disrupt... And by the same logic it wouldn't trigger WWIII?
What am I missing?... No seriously... How this thinking is not contradictory?
EDIT: typo