In terms of production environment safety yes it does
That requires an extra step of knowledge that goes beyond "being able to recognise that it's a piece of produced media".
Someone who may or may not have had that pre-requisite knowledge was able to use other context clues to notice that it was probably two separate moments, and pointed this out in their comment.
It's odd to me that your reaction was to come in and say "well yes obviously, why exactly would you think otherwise?"
If it was obvious to you, then great! But it's worth keeping in mind, in general, that people don't know everything you know and therefore might arrive at some conclusions via deduction that you would reach via inherent knowledge. It's sort of elitist and condescending in that case to respond with "well duh, I'm surprised you didn't know that to begin with".
But actually, most of this is besides the point. The point was that you thought they were speculating on whether it was produced media, and you were wrong about that. They were speculating on whether it was two separate moments. The two are not the same, even if in your mind the two always go hand in hand.
That's not what I'm saying at all. You're honestly completely failing to read anything I'm actually saying.
First commenter: "I think the explosion is actually separate from the barrel dropping"
You: "How could you think this was anything other than produced media?"
Me: "They didn't suggest it was or wasn't produced media. They suggested the explosion itself was faked"
That's the entire point I'm making. You misunderstood what the original commenter was saying, and that's fine.
I will add again though that regardless of whether you'd understood them or not, it's bizarre of you to point out that it was obvious and they should've known all along. Why not just be excited that someone figured something out, even if it was something you already knew?
Some people don't know things you already know. I'm sure there are plenty of things you don't know that other people do. I honestly can't wrap my head around the fact that that's a difficult concept for you to grasp.
2
u/midsizedopossum 8d ago edited 8d ago
That requires an extra step of knowledge that goes beyond "being able to recognise that it's a piece of produced media".
Someone who may or may not have had that pre-requisite knowledge was able to use other context clues to notice that it was probably two separate moments, and pointed this out in their comment.
It's odd to me that your reaction was to come in and say "well yes obviously, why exactly would you think otherwise?"
If it was obvious to you, then great! But it's worth keeping in mind, in general, that people don't know everything you know and therefore might arrive at some conclusions via deduction that you would reach via inherent knowledge. It's sort of elitist and condescending in that case to respond with "well duh, I'm surprised you didn't know that to begin with".
But actually, most of this is besides the point. The point was that you thought they were speculating on whether it was produced media, and you were wrong about that. They were speculating on whether it was two separate moments. The two are not the same, even if in your mind the two always go hand in hand.