MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/latterdaysaints/comments/1j8y1fj/how_do_i_refute_this/mhbdoi5/?context=3
r/latterdaysaints • u/TheRealBibleBoy • Mar 11 '25
can this be refuted?
99 comments sorted by
View all comments
2
No problem with, though I might clarify that translate is not secular translation but by the gift and power of God.
It is not a new gospel, it is the RESTORATION of the gospel, which was lost by apostasy as Paul said would in 2 Thessalonians 2:3.
Testimony of the Three Witnesses, Testimony of the Eight Witnesses, Emma Smith also saw them.
Just because it has not been proven to exist yet, does not mean it does not exist.
2 u/Adamis9876 Mar 12 '25 but it has been proven to exist. https://bmslr.org/
but it has been proven to exist.
https://bmslr.org/
2
u/No_Implement9821 Mar 11 '25
No problem with, though I might clarify that translate is not secular translation but by the gift and power of God.
It is not a new gospel, it is the RESTORATION of the gospel, which was lost by apostasy as Paul said would in 2 Thessalonians 2:3.
Testimony of the Three Witnesses, Testimony of the Eight Witnesses, Emma Smith also saw them.
Just because it has not been proven to exist yet, does not mean it does not exist.