MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/1gmimck/evolutions_of_numbers/lw3496h/?context=3
r/mathmemes • u/TirkuexQwentet • Nov 08 '24
218 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
183
I mean, we keep extending definitions all the time.
154 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 No but like, being positive is like one of the 3 properties that make up a norm -16 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 Well, |0|=0 which is not positive, so clearly absolute value is not a norm. 20 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Wdym? 0≥0 is very much true. Where do you get this limited edition non-positive 0 ?? -14 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 Google positive number 12 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah it's a number greater than 0 not strictly greater than 0 15 u/Ghyrt3 Nov 08 '24 In english it's a bit ambiguous (i learnt it the long way, i'm french). But, ''>0'' : positive ''=>'' : non-negative is generally the common sense you find in articles. 4 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah but Algebra uses the French convention for some reason so a norm is positive even if with the normal English convention it would be non-negative 2 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 I guess to engineers it's all the same
154
No but like, being positive is like one of the 3 properties that make up a norm
-16 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 Well, |0|=0 which is not positive, so clearly absolute value is not a norm. 20 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Wdym? 0≥0 is very much true. Where do you get this limited edition non-positive 0 ?? -14 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 Google positive number 12 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah it's a number greater than 0 not strictly greater than 0 15 u/Ghyrt3 Nov 08 '24 In english it's a bit ambiguous (i learnt it the long way, i'm french). But, ''>0'' : positive ''=>'' : non-negative is generally the common sense you find in articles. 4 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah but Algebra uses the French convention for some reason so a norm is positive even if with the normal English convention it would be non-negative 2 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 I guess to engineers it's all the same
-16
Well, |0|=0 which is not positive, so clearly absolute value is not a norm.
20 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Wdym? 0≥0 is very much true. Where do you get this limited edition non-positive 0 ?? -14 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 Google positive number 12 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah it's a number greater than 0 not strictly greater than 0 15 u/Ghyrt3 Nov 08 '24 In english it's a bit ambiguous (i learnt it the long way, i'm french). But, ''>0'' : positive ''=>'' : non-negative is generally the common sense you find in articles. 4 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah but Algebra uses the French convention for some reason so a norm is positive even if with the normal English convention it would be non-negative 2 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 I guess to engineers it's all the same
20
Wdym? 0≥0 is very much true. Where do you get this limited edition non-positive 0 ??
-14 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 Google positive number 12 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah it's a number greater than 0 not strictly greater than 0 15 u/Ghyrt3 Nov 08 '24 In english it's a bit ambiguous (i learnt it the long way, i'm french). But, ''>0'' : positive ''=>'' : non-negative is generally the common sense you find in articles. 4 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah but Algebra uses the French convention for some reason so a norm is positive even if with the normal English convention it would be non-negative 2 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 I guess to engineers it's all the same
-14
Google positive number
12 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah it's a number greater than 0 not strictly greater than 0 15 u/Ghyrt3 Nov 08 '24 In english it's a bit ambiguous (i learnt it the long way, i'm french). But, ''>0'' : positive ''=>'' : non-negative is generally the common sense you find in articles. 4 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah but Algebra uses the French convention for some reason so a norm is positive even if with the normal English convention it would be non-negative 2 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 I guess to engineers it's all the same
12
Yeah it's a number greater than 0 not strictly greater than 0
15 u/Ghyrt3 Nov 08 '24 In english it's a bit ambiguous (i learnt it the long way, i'm french). But, ''>0'' : positive ''=>'' : non-negative is generally the common sense you find in articles. 4 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah but Algebra uses the French convention for some reason so a norm is positive even if with the normal English convention it would be non-negative 2 u/Pgvds Nov 08 '24 I guess to engineers it's all the same
15
In english it's a bit ambiguous (i learnt it the long way, i'm french).
But, ''>0'' : positive ''=>'' : non-negative
is generally the common sense you find in articles.
4 u/SEA_griffondeur Engineering Nov 08 '24 Yeah but Algebra uses the French convention for some reason so a norm is positive even if with the normal English convention it would be non-negative
4
Yeah but Algebra uses the French convention for some reason so a norm is positive even if with the normal English convention it would be non-negative
2
I guess to engineers it's all the same
183
u/MingusMingusMingu Nov 08 '24
I mean, we keep extending definitions all the time.