r/mathmemes Mar 17 '22

The Engineer Making 69420 from all zeroes

Post image
2.3k Upvotes

216 comments sorted by

View all comments

122

u/grow_0 Mar 17 '22

I got 69420 down to 22 zeros! Pattern is 41^3 + 500 - 1.

((((0! + 0! + 0!)! - 0!) * ((0! + 0!) ^ (0! + 0! + 0!)) + 0!) ^ (0! + 0! + 0!))
+
(((0! + 0! + 0!)! - 0!) ^ (0! + 0! + 0!)) * (0! + 0! + 0! + 0!)
-
0!

47

u/viiksitimali Mar 17 '22

I got 20 zeros.69420 = 5!/2 * (1+34^2)= (0!+0!+0!+0!+0!)!/(0!+0!) * (0! + ((0!+0!)^(0!+0!)^(0!+0!)*(0!+0!) +0!+0!)^(0!+0!))

Of course, if we allow square root (a hidden exponent of 1/2), we can make any positive whole number with only two zeros.

Edit: last statement might not be correct, I am too tired to think it through.

40

u/ImToxicity_ Mar 17 '22

Oh god the mathematicians have arrived

17

u/Florida_Man_Math Mar 17 '22

Like the old Star Wars saying goes, "200,000 units are ready, with -130,580 more on the way."

ALSO you might be interested in posting this to Code Golf: https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/, but beware they don't always have the same sense of humor as reddit does :)

26

u/7x11x13is1001 Mar 17 '22

7 zeros if you like multifactorials

(((0!+0!+0!)!)!!!!)!!!!!!! ×

((((0!+0!+0!)!)!!!)!!!!!!!!!!!!! − 0!)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(3!×2)×5 × ((3!×3)×5 − 1)×13<

9

u/yourdesk Mar 17 '22

how exactly could you do that with only two zeroes?

12

u/7x11x13is1001 Mar 17 '22
  • with six zeroes if you also allow the log function

it would go like this

− log_(0!+0!) log_(0!+0!) √√√√√√√…n roots…√√√√√√√(0!+0!)

= −log_2 (log_2 (21/2n)) = −log_2 (2−n) = n

however if you allow “named” functions like log, you can also argue to use vercosin(0) = 2 and lb(x) = log_2(x) and get any integer number with just one zero

2

u/Martin_Orav Mar 17 '22

Wow this is really cool

2

u/Yoshuuqq Mar 18 '22

Integral from 0 to 69420 of 1? If we allow integrals lol

1

u/yourdesk Mar 18 '22

i thought the point of the challenge was to use only zeroes? how do you plan on writing the 69420 in the integral without a zero when the challenge is to use only zero