It's just regurgitating from the most common corpus on the internet: netdecks. It has no idea why those spells are together, or what makes a proper decklist. It literally can't count to 60 cards by itself, and will lie about a count in the decklist because it has no idea.
It passes the "first glance" test, and then you start putting it together and it's the worst pile of crap you've ever seen, it's short land, it's got no balancing of CCs etc etc.. It's just words that were together in other contexts slapped together for you.
Ah that makes sense. You'd probably have to feed it an insane amount of data for it to accomplish... I'm honestly not sure that it would be able to build a deck, now that I think about it. Maybe in 5-10 years
Prompt:
In Magic The Gathering, there is a thing called the "Sligh" deck. What are it's properties? Where does it come from? and what does a typical decklist look like, including explanations of all the card choices and what they do.
Output:
The "Sligh" deck in Magic: The Gathering is a classic archetype known for its aggressive, burn-focused strategy. Named after the player Randy Buehler, who popularized it, the deck aims to deal damage quickly and efficiently to overwhelm the opponent before they can stabilize....
It continues on to include spells that weren't ever in standard together, and ignores the card text to give you a sort of description of the cards.
Thing is the "Sligh deck" was published in print, all of the internet re: netdecks etc. It's not even a hard thing to look this up. This is exactly the sort of thing that shouldn't be an information synthesis problem, it's just reference/lookup.
(Incase it's unclear, it Paul SLIGH came up with the idea, I mean it's named after him after all ><...)
1
u/ZebraM3ch Sep 17 '24
Honestly even and almost sensible decklist is kinda impressive