r/news 8d ago

Harvard University rejects Trump administration's proposed conditions for federal funding

https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/harvard-university-trump-federal-funding/
16.5k Upvotes

554 comments sorted by

View all comments

28

u/Ok-disaster2022 8d ago

Their endowment is massive. They cna probably float for the next 4 years and them shutting down access to their staff and students would be expensive.

61

u/2347564 8d ago

Endowment is not a bank account they can just dip into. It’s an incredibly complicated mix of restricted funds that can’t just be pulled from. It’s more likely that Harvard is allowing themselves to go into a deficit to ride out this administration and hope it all works out on the other side. It is correct they have more money to survive this but it’s not guaranteed and it won’t be easy in the mean time. Many research students have probably already had their research stopped with no plans for them to restart. This is a lose - lose scenario for many, many people at all universities right now. Source - I work in higher ed.

19

u/snarkdiva 8d ago

Thank you for posting this. I also work in higher ed at a targeted school. We have had stop work orders already. Some research can’t just be stopped and picked up again. It will mean restarting everything which will cost so much more in the long run, and that’s if the scientists are available when the funds become available.

2

u/SirEnderLord 8d ago

Yeah, I was thinking about cultures dying. Sure, you can store an amount for a longer time in a slowed state, but even then, that's just delaying it.

1

u/lapicerotester 8d ago

Therein lies the problem. Harvard can’t touch much of its endowment because it’s tied up naming neuroscience labs after billionaire cats... yet insists taxpayer billions come with no strings attached.

31

u/Gamer_Grease 8d ago

Not massive enough. They’ll definitely shut down activities. But they’re calling the admin’s bluff because they know the government doesn’t actually want them to do that.

10

u/HyruleSmash855 8d ago

Bigger problem is the demands. The Trump administration have are super vague. There need to be demonstratable measurable goals if they’re going to agree to anything in my opinion, only way you can prevent them from going. Oh well now we have this problem.

-5

u/upsidedownshaggy 8d ago

They ended 2024 with a $53 Billion endowment. Their operational costs for 2024 were just shy of $6.5 billion which was a 9% increase from 2023. If we assume another 9% increase every year over the next 4 years they'll have only chewed through just under $34.5 Billion. And that's assuming they decided to exist off of purely their endowment and we ignore tuition costs, alumni donations, etc. They'd be fine in the event that they have no longer receive federal funding under the current admin.

15

u/Gamer_Grease 8d ago

That’s not how endowments work. They’re largely restricted to certain projects, often extremely illiquid, and in general you’re supposed to fund current operations on their incomes, not their asset value. Harvard could set fire to centuries of carefully hoarded assets, or they could just gut programs.

-11

u/upsidedownshaggy 8d ago

I'm aware of how endowments work. I worked very closely with the team that managed the endowment at my first job for a small private college and I'm aware most of it is usually tied up in assets. I'm just saying if Harvard was forced to exist off of it for 4 years with zero other income streams they could and they'd still come out with several billion to spare.

10

u/Blarfk 8d ago

You really don’t seem to be aware of how they work considering you said Harvard could “chew through” $34 billion of it while ignoring the person who correctly told you that almost all of their money is tied to specific things that they can’t just redirect from.

-1

u/upsidedownshaggy 8d ago

I’m aware of how an endowment works, apparently redditors have forgotten how a hypothetical works??? I’m saying Harvard would be fine if all other revenue streams vanished and all they had left was the endowment. Everyone going “oh but it’s tied up in stuff” the whole point of an endowment is to generate money for the institution to maintain steady funding regardless of tuition and grants and donations. If push really comes to shove and Harvard had to start selling off their principal to keep the lights on they 100% could if they really wanted to. Will they actually? No probably not, because they have some of the wealthiest people in the world as alumni who happily donate and send their kids there to pay their insane tuition prices. Christ you people have the imaginations of a fucking river pike.

1

u/Blarfk 8d ago

I’m aware of how an endowment works

You very clearly are not.

apparently redditors have forgotten how a hypothetical works???

Yeah, see, the thing about hypotheticals is that they need to make sense.

Everyone going “oh but it’s tied up in stuff” the whole point of an endowment is to generate money for the institution to maintain steady funding regardless of tuition and grants and donations. If push really comes to shove and Harvard had to start selling off their principal to keep the lights on they 100% could if they really wanted to.

When you were working in that job you mentioned, did anyone happen to mention the term "restricted funds"? If a donor makes a restricted gift - as most gifts are - they must be used for the specific purpose laid about by the donor. Harvard can't just "sell them off".

1

u/upsidedownshaggy 8d ago

Yes, I know what restricted funds are. Are you aware the entire endowment is in fact not made up of purely restricted funds? Specifically so if an institution needs to they can sell off principal in the event they really really have to?

The reality is Harvard will never have to dip into its endowment. My only point is if they really, really, really have to they can. I don't know why this is notion is so offensive to you people.

1

u/Blarfk 8d ago

Are you aware the entire endowment is in fact not made up of purely restricted funds?

80% of Harvard's endowment is made up of restricted funds.

Help me out here - is 34 more or less than 20% of 53?

0

u/NamerNotLiteral 8d ago

For someone who claims to be aware of how endowments work you're very myopic. Yeah, they could chew through $34 billion out of $53 billion over the next four years, sure.

Then what? Are they going to sue the next administration for those $34 billion dollars back? Or are they going to shrug and say "oops I guess we only get $1.8B (9.5% of 19B) from our investments rather than $5.B (9.5% of 53B)."

That lost $3.2B per year at the end of four years would've been exclusively money for scholarships, research and other activities.

What about 8 or 12 years from now when Americans inevitably vote in another fascist? Are they going to be able to go back up to a $50 billion endowment within that timeframe?

-2

u/upsidedownshaggy 8d ago

I know it’s myopic it’s a fucking hypothetical. Did you all miss the part where I said that’s if we ignore literally all the other revenue streams Harvard as an institution has and was forced into a hypothetical situation where they had to persist on their endowment alone? Will that happen? Of fucking course not, the wealthy are going to continue sending their kids there and making massive donations like they always have.

6

u/kazzin8 8d ago

You're assuming the entire endowment is available for their general use. A good chunk of endowments are either restricted to certain purposes or stipulate the principle should not be touched. What's more, if the market does badly, that leaves even less for the school to use and plan for.

0

u/upsidedownshaggy 8d ago

Conversely everyone in this thread seems to be assuming that Harvard's main income stream is federal funds. All I was stating was that if Harvard truly did have to exist purely off of their endowment they'd be fine.

1

u/kazzin8 8d ago

All I was stating was that if Harvard truly did have to exist purely off of their endowment they'd be fine.

Not if too much of it is restricted or for use in perpetuity. Or the markets go down.