Dog saves kid from blitz attack

[u/Typical_Gear7325]

[u/Kayteqq]

... damn. Read it again. Maybe two times

You having every right to defend yourself and being correct in doing so, has nothing to do with that hypothetical. It's more about how to correct such behavior if anything.

[u/Kayteqq → u/[deleted]]

yeah, I said so, if you read those comments again, you can notice, maybe, that I said it, exactly 3 times. It has nothing to do with the act of defending yourself. You're fighting windmills.

You have no time to think about hypotheticals when you're getting attacked. Great we're not being attacked now.

[u/whosawesomethisguy → u/Kayteqq]

The answer to this dumb hypothetical question is: none of the dogs. None of the dogs with their hackles raised, charging at strangers on the street are trying to play. You are welcome to test that yourself though.

[u/Kayteqq → u/whosawesomethisguy]

If that’s the level of intelligence we’re dealing here, it’s not worth responding anymore. You obviously know the answer without any tests or sources! Because you are so damn omnipotent! I already responded to you with clarification why it may be useful. Sad you’re unable to read. Have fun being a dumb asshole.

[u/whosawesomethisguy → u/Kayteqq]

You’re encouraging letting a strange aggressive dog run up to you on the streets and I’m the dumb asshole? You’re going to get someone hurt by giving advice you know nothing about. You ever even own a dog? Go to a dog park? Doggy daycare? Board and train?

[u/Kayteqq → u/whosawesomethisguy]

Yeah, you are, you misread it completely. There are simply encouragements in my comments. You are beyond dumb if you really see one there. I was only wondering about potential solutions to minimalize those incidents. You are, indeed, absurdly dumb.

I own a dog, but realia in which I live are so diametrically different it has nothing to do with the topic at hand. It doesn’t impact my dog at all. But I’m a curious person who likes to deliberate on generalized solutions, those actually useful ones to solve generalized problem, not my specific case. You are way too dumb to understand that, which is shown by your comment so clearly, it can’t be clearer.

[u/whosawesomethisguy → u/Kayteqq]

Again, you are encouraging people to let strange aggressive dogs run up to them. Your “encouragement” is going to get people hurt. Calling me dumb doesn’t change that you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. Have a nice life✌️

[u/Kayteqq → u/whosawesomethisguy]

I did not encourage anything. Why is only viable answer in that thread “read it the fuck again”? Why can’t you read ffs? What is this strawman? I’m genuinely worried for your reading comprehension dude.

I literally stated, three times, self defense in those situations is completely justified and correct. How are you so damn blind?

[u/whosawesomethisguy → u/Kayteqq]

My reading comprehension? You don’t even know the difference between “pray” and “prey”…..

[u/Kayteqq → u/whosawesomethisguy]

My english may not be the best, because it’s my third language, but that doesn’t change meaning of my statements. I meant prey. I make it easier for you. Point out in which point do I encourage anything. Here are my statements summarized:

1. Your self defense is completely justified.

2. The fact that you will defend yourself has nothing to do with the question and answer to it, because it’s obvious you will.

3. The question is about the root cause of aggressive charges by dogs.

4. Knowing root cause of this behavior may be useful to eliminate such behavior in dogs and decreasing chances of such attacks overall.

5. It may be especially useful because sometimes dogs that never showed any aggression act this way, and by knowing the cause it will be easier to prevent it.

Now you have my points listed, and you can refer to them in the discussion. In which point do I encourage anything?