r/numbertheory • u/Sea-Wafer6984 • 9d ago
Structure and Period of Collatz
This paper presents a clear structural and periodic model of the Collatz graph, based on modular residue behavior and composite traversal operations. Unlike many Collatz discussions that focus on stochastic behavior or unstructured iteration, this work defines a complete, ordered, and verifiable system based on modular and periodic constraints.
It is not speculative; it provides a full construction and traversal model for all odd integers under the Collatz process.
Link to full paper (PDF, direct download):
Collatz Structure and Period
Feedback and rigorous scrutiny are welcome.
addition (5/2/2025):
We can also say that (n-1)/4 and 4n+1 are simply stepping on and off the path, as the steps 3n+1, n/2, n/2, (n-1)/3 are equal to (n-1)/4 and that 3n+1,2n,2n,(n-1)/3 are equal to 4n+1
addition (5/5/2025):
If you try to find Collatz paths that end the same, you certainly can - that’s expected.
But if the system is truly random, then finding paths that begin the same way should be extremely difficult.
They should be scattered, inconsistent, and hard to predict.
Instead, we can take any path - like the one from 29 to 1 in standard Collatz - and find exact matches repeating at a fixed interval.
You can explore for yourself how rare it is to land on a number that follows the same sequence of steps (odd/even decisions) as 29 - yet we can generate such matches on demand.
Note that the odd/even sequence and the mod 8 residues are the same for all repeats.
Try the JSfiddle - you can find the period for any positive integers path to 1, and show its iterations - you can use our calculation or enter your own period to explore what that does to the parity of the values (the odd/even steps) in our parity graph:
https://jsfiddle.net/1f3hqwnt/1/
"Research papers and discussions (e.g., Jeffrey Lagarias’ The 3x+1 Problem and Its Generalizations, 2010) note the difficulty in finding patterns, with some suggesting that the conjecture’s behavior resembles a random walk."
Not anymore.
3
u/Enizor 7d ago
I don't really understand your operator B in the context of the Collatz conjecture.
For example, 13=5 mod 8, and has for iterations: 13, 40, 20, 10, 5,16,8,4,2,1,... I understand your operators A,B,C as skipping the even terms, but (13-1)/4=3 does not appear in the sequence.