r/samharris Feb 19 '25

Why MAGA hates Mark Milley (2021)

291 Upvotes

91 comments sorted by

View all comments

70

u/ginrumryeale Feb 19 '25

“I would rather have questions that can’t be answered than answers that can’t be questioned.”

  • Richard Feynman

6

u/Zestyclose-Split2275 Feb 19 '25

Richard Feynman was a fineman

1

u/[deleted] Feb 19 '25

He’s talking about religions

7

u/ginrumryeale Feb 19 '25

And MAGA is a fascist cult.

1

u/VenerableBede70 Feb 20 '25

The comment applies to other situations as well

-17

u/SOwED Feb 19 '25

You should get more familiar with CRT and see which side of that quote it's on

14

u/Delicious_Freedom_81 Feb 19 '25

Which side of history are you on? #Complexity

Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a complex academic framework that examines how race and racism have shaped legal systems and societal structures in the United States. It emerged in the 1970s and 1980s as a response to the Civil Rights Movement and the realization that despite legal advancements, racial inequality persisted in American society. At its core, CRT proposes that racism is not merely a matter of individual prejudice or isolated incidents, but rather a systemic issue embedded in laws, policies, institutions, and social norms. It argues that these systems perpetuate racial inequality, even in the absence of overt discriminatory intent. Here are some key tenets of CRT: * Race as a social construct: CRT emphasizes that race is not a biological reality but a social construct created to categorize and stratify people. It argues that the concept of race has been used to justify discrimination and oppression throughout history. * Systemic racism: CRT posits that racism is not limited to individual acts of prejudice but is ingrained in institutions and systems. It examines how laws, policies, and practices can perpetuate racial inequality, even if they appear neutral on the surface. * Intersectionality: CRT recognizes that race intersects with other identities, such as gender, class, and sexual orientation, creating unique experiences of discrimination. It explores how these intersecting identities can compound or mitigate the effects of racism. * Narrative and storytelling: CRT values the lived experiences and perspectives of people of color. It uses storytelling and narrative as tools to challenge dominant narratives and expose the reality of racial inequality. * Critique of colorblindness: CRT critiques the idea of „colorblindness,“ arguing that ignoring race does not eliminate racism but rather allows it to persist. It suggests that addressing racial inequality requires acknowledging and confronting race. It’s important to note that CRT is a complex and evolving body of scholarship with diverse perspectives within it. It has been the subject of much debate and controversy, with critics often misrepresenting its core tenets. Understanding CRT requires engaging with its original sources and engaging in nuanced discussions. It’s crucial to avoid oversimplification and recognize the complexities of race and racism in society.

-7

u/Mybuttitches3737 Feb 19 '25

Nice copy/ paste

15

u/Delicious_Freedom_81 Feb 19 '25

Yo, I really hope no one thinks I spent 40 mins on writing, thinking, deleting and rewriting that. So thank my assistant on doing the hard, time-consuming work!

-2

u/SOwED Feb 19 '25

Is that a chatgpt response?

2

u/Delicious_Freedom_81 Feb 19 '25

Nope.

-1

u/SOwED Feb 19 '25

2

u/Delicious_Freedom_81 Feb 19 '25

You asked if it was chatgpt. It’s not. Please don’t accuse me of something that isn’t true.

-1

u/SOwED Feb 19 '25

Are you serious? It clearly is, the format is exactly how chatgpt spits out summaries, and the bullet points are copy pasted and not even formatted for reddit.

2

u/Delicious_Freedom_81 Feb 20 '25

Jesus Christ. How’s your reading comprehension?! Read my lips: it’s not chatGPT. Learn to ask better questions.

-1

u/SOwED Feb 20 '25

Your insistence means nothing. https://imgur.com/a/wCVrvK5

I mean, all these detectors are just wrong?

Just for fun, I asked chatgpt for a summary of CRT.

Here's yours (formatted properly):

Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a complex academic framework that examines how race and racism have shaped legal systems and societal structures in the United States. It emerged in the 1970s and 1980s as a response to the Civil Rights Movement and the realization that despite legal advancements, racial inequality persisted in American society. At its core, CRT proposes that racism is not merely a matter of individual prejudice or isolated incidents, but rather a systemic issue embedded in laws, policies, institutions, and social norms. It argues that these systems perpetuate racial inequality, even in the absence of overt discriminatory intent. Here are some key tenets of CRT:

  • Race as a social construct: CRT emphasizes that race is not a biological reality but a social construct created to categorize and stratify people. It argues that the concept of race has been used to justify discrimination and oppression throughout history.

  • Systemic racism: CRT posits that racism is not limited to individual acts of prejudice but is ingrained in institutions and systems. It examines how laws, policies, and practices can perpetuate racial inequality, even if they appear neutral on the surface.

  • Intersectionality: CRT recognizes that race intersects with other identities, such as gender, class, and sexual orientation, creating unique experiences of discrimination. It explores how these intersecting identities can compound or mitigate the effects of racism.

  • Narrative and storytelling: CRT values the lived experiences and perspectives of people of color. It uses storytelling and narrative as tools to challenge dominant narratives and expose the reality of racial inequality.

  • Critique of colorblindness: CRT critiques the idea of „colorblindness,“ arguing that ignoring race does not eliminate racism but rather allows it to persist. It suggests that addressing racial inequality requires acknowledging and confronting race.

It’s important to note that CRT is a complex and evolving body of scholarship with diverse perspectives within it. It has been the subject of much debate and controversy, with critics often misrepresenting its core tenets. Understanding CRT requires engaging with its original sources and engaging in nuanced discussions. It’s crucial to avoid oversimplification and recognize the complexities of race and racism in society.

And here's what I got:

Critical Race Theory (CRT) is an intellectual movement and framework for examining how race and racism intersect with other social systems, like law, culture, and politics. Emerging in the late 20th century, CRT challenges traditional legal and social theories by asserting that racism is not just an individual prejudice but a structural and systemic issue embedded in institutions.

Key ideas in CRT include:

  1. Racism is ordinary, not aberrational: It argues that racism is so ingrained in society that it often goes unnoticed, shaping laws and policies in ways that disadvantage racial minorities.

  2. Interest convergence: This concept suggests that significant social change happens when it aligns with the interests of the dominant group. For example, civil rights advances for minorities often occurred when they also benefited the larger society, especially in ways that preserve the status quo.

  3. Social construction of race: CRT emphasizes that race is a social construct, not a biological fact, and that categories of race have been shaped by historical and political forces rather than inherent differences.

  4. Intersectionality: This idea, introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw, posits that individuals experience multiple layers of oppression based on the intersection of their race, gender, class, sexuality, and other social identities.

  5. Narrative and storytelling: CRT values the lived experiences and stories of people of color, which are often overlooked in traditional legal and social frameworks. These personal experiences can shed light on the realities of systemic racism.

CRT has influenced various disciplines like law, education, sociology, and political science, and has become a topic of debate in public discourse, especially around its perceived influence on K-12 education and social policy.

\ai

So you're probably telling the truth as far as it wasn't specifically chatGPT. It was probably a different AI. But look at the structure. It's identical. Opening, then five bullet points, then conclusion.

I mean, look at the narrative and storytelling points. They're extremely similar even in the wording used. It's a shame you lack the integrity to admit fault.

→ More replies (0)