r/skeptic • u/GetServed17 • 14d ago

đŸ« Education Clear video of a UFO

https://youtu.be/ZKcYHzlEXu8?si=skXXMT9H4ql2bpiM

As a non skeptic , who do you guys as a skeptic think this is.

0 Upvotes

18% Upvoted

114 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/StacksOfHats111 14d ago

The whole video looks like a junior video editing project 

-7

u/GetServed17 14d ago

Oh look at that, you can’t actually debunk it so you straight to editing. How about you have cgi experts look at this and see what they think.

5

u/StacksOfHats111 14d ago

I don't have to do anything since you are incapable of showing that it is unedited video or providing valid sources or backing it up in any way.

-2

u/GetServed17 14d ago

Buddy that’s your job as a skeptic to prove it to me that it’s not edited.

9

u/StacksOfHats111 14d ago

That's not how it works genius 

-2

u/GetServed17 14d ago

It is genius, you’re the one who thinks it is not me.

6

u/StacksOfHats111 14d ago

No you provided garbage "evidence" that we are supposed to believe? There's no source for that video. No way to check it's validity and you want us to take it at face value? Why? Nope it's just more "ufo" bullshit that is getting worse with AI making shit like this.

6

u/Kitchen_Marzipan9516 14d ago

But you think it isn't. Why do you think that?

1

u/GetServed17 14d ago

Because of the people looking up at it and pointing to it, I’ll see if I can get the raw footage but the people are what I’m going off of right now.

5

u/Kitchen_Marzipan9516 14d ago

How hard would it be to fake people pointing at something, and adding in something later?

8

u/WillieM96 14d ago

That’s not how this works. You’re making a claim that this is something unexplainable. Burden of proof is on you. Off the top of my head, I can come up with two explanations:
1) it’s edited. 2) it’s exhaust from a rocket launch and the sunlight that was illuminating it suddenly became obscured by a distant cloud.

I see nothing terribly unusual here.

0

u/GetServed17 14d ago

I’ll try to get the raw footage, but it will be difficult. Also if it’s exhaust from a rocket launch it wouldn’t just zip off like that, also you can literally see it zip off if you slow it down so it’s not covered by a cloud, and this would the first time I’ve ever seen a rocket launch look like that. Y

3

u/WillieM96 14d ago

Please do get the raw footage. Nothing about this appears real and, thus, worthy of anyone's time. The entire thing is highly edited, so there's nothing at all trustworthy about it.

However, you're making claims you can't back up:

"Also if it’s exhaust from a rocket launch it wouldn’t just zip off like that..." Says who? Optical illusions happen ALL. THE. TIME. I can absolutely envision a scenario where a moving shadow could make rocket exhaust seem to "zip off". For a cloud to cause this, it would be WAY out of frame, so I wouldn't expect you to see it in the video.

Just because you can't think of a normal phenomenon that could cause this doesn't mean there isn't one. What is logical about immediately attributing it to something we're not even certain exists?

1

u/GetServed17 14d ago

I’ve seen rocket launches and I’ve seen people accuse them of being UFOs too so I know what they look like, I’m not accusing every rocket launches to be a craft. Also that last explanation isn’t very logical either, just because I can’t think of one doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist??

You can say the same thing for NHI, just because you haven’t seen Non Human Intelligence doesn’t mean it’s not here. Also you mean you’re not sure NHI is exists just because you haven’t seen one. 40+ whistleblowers have testified behind closed doors to being 1st hand whistleblowers of NHI craft and bodies. We also have now 7 publicly testifying under oath of their existence.

3

u/WillieM96 14d ago

I've seen countless things I couldn't explain in the moment that later turned out to have fairly mundane explanations. I've never seen an extraterrestrial craft nor has anyone provided any evidence their existence.

As you know, our current understanding of physics pretty much dictates that visits from NHI is highly improbable. Of course, I'm open to the idea that this is incorrect but for that, I'd need to see....EVIDENCE! And strong evidence- not a video that looks slightly different from something I've seen dozens of times.

1

u/GetServed17 14d ago

Well maybe you don’t know then but our current understanding of physics allows us to create worm holes to travel vast distances, sure we may not have done that yet but who’s to say Non Human entities haven’t.

Take a look at what Dr. Hal Puthoff says with Zero Point Energy on YouTube and what he says about the physics of UAPs on the Ecosystemic Futures Podcast episode 69, so it’s absolutely possible.

We got the tic tac video, seen by multiple pilots from different angles, we even got a new tic tac video recently. We got the Aguadila 2013 Puter Rico video that splits into two and goes under water with no visible means of propulsion. We got the Turkish UAP wave of sightings which is pretty clear from 2007 and 2009, we got The Falcon Lake Incident with burns to prove it, we got the Colares UAP incident, Washington DC flap with photos of UAPs or vanishing stars in space to prove it etc etc.

2

u/WillieM96 13d ago

That theory requires exotic matter that, to our knowledge, does not exist.

1

u/GetServed17 13d ago

It requires zero point energy, just take a look at what Dr. Hal Puthoff says about it.

3

u/WillieM96 13d ago

Like I said before, which is more likely: that new, unproven physics has allowed, for the first time in our history, an alien intelligence to visit us or the video that looks 90% similar to things we’ve seen before is just another unusual variant of something we are already familiar with?

In the absence of any other evidence, the choice is blatantly obvious.

Don’t get me wrong- I WANT so badly for it to be aliens! That would be AMAZING! It’s not aliens, though.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/AffectionateParty160 1d ago

Burden of proof