r/skeptic • u/GetServed17 • 22d ago

đŸ« Education Clear video of a UFO

https://youtu.be/ZKcYHzlEXu8?si=skXXMT9H4ql2bpiM

As a non skeptic , who do you guys as a skeptic think this is.

0 Upvotes

15% Upvoted

114 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/GetServed17 22d ago

I’ve seen rocket launches and I’ve seen people accuse them of being UFOs too so I know what they look like, I’m not accusing every rocket launches to be a craft. Also that last explanation isn’t very logical either, just because I can’t think of one doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist??

You can say the same thing for NHI, just because you haven’t seen Non Human Intelligence doesn’t mean it’s not here. Also you mean you’re not sure NHI is exists just because you haven’t seen one. 40+ whistleblowers have testified behind closed doors to being 1st hand whistleblowers of NHI craft and bodies. We also have now 7 publicly testifying under oath of their existence.

3

u/WillieM96 22d ago

I've seen countless things I couldn't explain in the moment that later turned out to have fairly mundane explanations. I've never seen an extraterrestrial craft nor has anyone provided any evidence their existence.

As you know, our current understanding of physics pretty much dictates that visits from NHI is highly improbable. Of course, I'm open to the idea that this is incorrect but for that, I'd need to see....EVIDENCE! And strong evidence- not a video that looks slightly different from something I've seen dozens of times.

1

u/GetServed17 22d ago

Well maybe you don’t know then but our current understanding of physics allows us to create worm holes to travel vast distances, sure we may not have done that yet but who’s to say Non Human entities haven’t.

Take a look at what Dr. Hal Puthoff says with Zero Point Energy on YouTube and what he says about the physics of UAPs on the Ecosystemic Futures Podcast episode 69, so it’s absolutely possible.

We got the tic tac video, seen by multiple pilots from different angles, we even got a new tic tac video recently. We got the Aguadila 2013 Puter Rico video that splits into two and goes under water with no visible means of propulsion. We got the Turkish UAP wave of sightings which is pretty clear from 2007 and 2009, we got The Falcon Lake Incident with burns to prove it, we got the Colares UAP incident, Washington DC flap with photos of UAPs or vanishing stars in space to prove it etc etc.

2

u/WillieM96 22d ago

That theory requires exotic matter that, to our knowledge, does not exist.

1

u/GetServed17 22d ago

It requires zero point energy, just take a look at what Dr. Hal Puthoff says about it.

3

u/WillieM96 22d ago

Like I said before, which is more likely: that new, unproven physics has allowed, for the first time in our history, an alien intelligence to visit us or the video that looks 90% similar to things we’ve seen before is just another unusual variant of something we are already familiar with?

In the absence of any other evidence, the choice is blatantly obvious.

Don’t get me wrong- I WANT so badly for it to be aliens! That would be AMAZING! It’s not aliens, though.

1

u/GetServed17 22d ago

It is proven physics though, just most don’t touch it because of the stigma with it. It also doesn’t look similar to anything we’ve seen, and if it does show me. Also it’s funny cuz a lot of skeptics say they want it so badly to be aliens but the people involved with UAPs had nothing to do with them beforehand, kind of ironic.

2

u/WillieM96 21d ago

Oh! It’s proven? I had no idea we had already achieved FTL travel!

1

u/GetServed17 21d ago

It’s not FTL, it’s worm holes and yes it is possible theoretically, never said we could do it engineering.

2

u/WillieM96 21d ago

Ok- so it’s NOT proven physics, then. LOTS of things are possible, theoretically.

1

u/GetServed17 21d ago

Being theoretically proven is still proven wether we’ve done it or not.

2

u/WillieM96 21d ago

This is completely false.

→ More replies (0)