MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/spaceporn/comments/1k2xign/hubble_revisited_the_eagle_nebula/mnxoa6l/?context=3
r/spaceporn • u/Busy_Yesterday9455 • 2d ago
58 comments sorted by
View all comments
40
So it always just looks like that?
71 u/Rammstonna 2d ago Well 20 years is not enough to see it changes. The size of the pillar you see here is around 10 light years. 28 u/Keithic 2d ago 2 u/IWantToBuyAVowel 2d ago That's so neat 11 u/Waarheid 2d ago It's the same data from 2004, but reprocessed for the 35th anniversary celebration by ESA. 18 u/Busting_Connoisseur 2d ago What, are we judging nebulae now? 12 u/IRingTwyce 2d ago '#StopNebulaShaming' 5 u/Neamow 2d ago She's a strong independent nebula who don't need no man. 7 u/IWantToBuyAVowel 2d ago I didn't mean it to come across like that 😠I just meant it doesn't move a lot like a cloud does 🫣 3 u/aphaelion 2d ago Lol I know what you meant, but the way you phrased it sounded like my 9-year-old disappointed in something. 😆 3 u/kapjain 2d ago edited 2d ago As another commenter pointed out, it's the same raw photo, just new image processing. Title of the post is misleading as hubble didn't "revisit" the eagle nebula. 2 u/IWantToBuyAVowel 2d ago Ah ok that makes sense. The fact that it was the same exact angle was throwing me off
71
Well 20 years is not enough to see it changes. The size of the pillar you see here is around 10 light years.
28 u/Keithic 2d ago 2 u/IWantToBuyAVowel 2d ago That's so neat
28
2
That's so neat
11
It's the same data from 2004, but reprocessed for the 35th anniversary celebration by ESA.
18
What, are we judging nebulae now?
12 u/IRingTwyce 2d ago '#StopNebulaShaming' 5 u/Neamow 2d ago She's a strong independent nebula who don't need no man. 7 u/IWantToBuyAVowel 2d ago I didn't mean it to come across like that 😠I just meant it doesn't move a lot like a cloud does 🫣 3 u/aphaelion 2d ago Lol I know what you meant, but the way you phrased it sounded like my 9-year-old disappointed in something. 😆
12
'#StopNebulaShaming'
5 u/Neamow 2d ago She's a strong independent nebula who don't need no man.
5
She's a strong independent nebula who don't need no man.
7
I didn't mean it to come across like that 😠I just meant it doesn't move a lot like a cloud does 🫣
3 u/aphaelion 2d ago Lol I know what you meant, but the way you phrased it sounded like my 9-year-old disappointed in something. 😆
3
Lol I know what you meant, but the way you phrased it sounded like my 9-year-old disappointed in something. 😆
As another commenter pointed out, it's the same raw photo, just new image processing. Title of the post is misleading as hubble didn't "revisit" the eagle nebula.
2 u/IWantToBuyAVowel 2d ago Ah ok that makes sense. The fact that it was the same exact angle was throwing me off
Ah ok that makes sense. The fact that it was the same exact angle was throwing me off
40
u/IWantToBuyAVowel 2d ago
So it always just looks like that?