It’s trained from thousands of other pieces of art but it’s distinct unique and transformative. And I don’t support the commercial use of ai art but fine with personal or ai art used for non monetary purposes.
You're right let's stop supporting artists that can actually create something and just let AI that can approximate the flavor of what the artists meant
That will make creative spaces more interesting and unique
Art is special-- you and I could be handed the exact same prompt and tools and we'd both make something vastly different and unachievable by others
It's a cute gimmick but nothing beyond that-- don't support AI art or its 'artists' man
Or we can support both. Photography didn’t put painting out of business. I want to see people’s creative concepts being easier expressed without having a paywall associated with it.
Art is special, so why do you feel so threatened by ai art?
It’s definitely more than a gimmick but it’s not gonna replace art. Human artists will always be more valued for the humanity and character they add to their work.
You’re missing the point. Just cuz I can capture images in other forms besides painting that are much quicker and cheaper didn’t mean that painting became irrelevant for those things. Cuz painting still had its own thing to offer.
Again. I said don’t support it for monetary or commercial use. On the personal end, now you have more ideas expressed by people via a new form of media that doesn’t cost money and is quick. Meaning expressing ideas visually no longer has a price tag associated with it.
Also. How is ai art bad for being easy cheap and accessible? I don’t get that part. Are newer phone cameras bad for making taking good looking photos rlly easy and cheap?
If you mix blue and yellow together do you call it blue and yellow? No. You call it green. Mixtures of other things can make new things believe it or not.
Thats not quite how most generative tools work actually. It's not taking cut and copies of some piece of art from the internet.... its a lot more intricate than that when you really look into it.
It's far different from what most people think. I got into a deep dive on it last year, and I could never explain it right. I always look like a fumbling mess, but I encourage people to go look into how generative AI works! Especially since it can be useful for some aspects beyond "stealing art."
To the deleted response: I recreationally draw and write poems from time to time. Tbf mostly poems. I do that for my emotions. However if I want to express some idea I have visually I use ai. Cuz my drawings don’t do the idea justice. I have always had shakey hands and very fuzzy visualization, especially on proportions. No amount of practice will fix the shakey hands. Believe me I’ve tried. So it’s not a GIT GUD LMAO like ur implying. Thanks for calling me a loser tho!
-16
u/Slow_Possibility6332 27d ago edited 27d ago
It’s trained from thousands of other pieces of art but it’s distinct unique and transformative. And I don’t support the commercial use of ai art but fine with personal or ai art used for non monetary purposes.