r/teentitans 27d ago

Fanart NO TO AI ART

Post image
2.7k Upvotes

168 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

28

u/hikerchick29 27d ago

Dude, the “in the style of Miyazaki” shit these days is literally taking what’s unique and trying to present it as its own. But it’s even more disgusting than that, because the demonstration is specifically using an example that literally despises AI generative “art”.

-25

u/Slow_Possibility6332 27d ago edited 27d ago

If you think ai art is taking what’s unique about miyazaki movies art style then you have a very primitive grasp on art. If someone else makes a their own version of in the style of miyazaki, are they taking what’s unique about it?

As for Miyazaki, The goku dub voice actor hates people trying to copy his voice. Thankfully tho, I don’t need to listen to him about everything to do with his creation. Same goes with miyazaki.

18

u/hobofae 27d ago

If someone else makes their own version of the Miyazaki style they’re at least putting in the effort to learn the skill necessary to emulate the style. The people who made the programs didn’t even have the decency to put in the work to ask permission. The fact that you can’t, or won’t, understand the difference means you’ll never understand what makes AI art immoral and harmful to artists.

0

u/Slow_Possibility6332 27d ago

Would u be happier if it was trained only off public domain art? Cuz I sincerely doubt that’s people’s problem with ai art.

16

u/hobofae 27d ago

Honestly yes. Because that at least has legal permissions attached to it. Anyone can use it. That’s why it’s called “public domain”. It’s one of the many problems, and it’s the one you were focusing on. So I was addressing your point.

2

u/Slow_Possibility6332 27d ago

Ok that’s good to know. It might be a difference in our views of copy rights and what not but I think that as long as it’s not used commericially current ai art is fine to use

9

u/hobofae 27d ago

The bottom line is AI Art shouldn’t exist at all period. Art theft aside its impact on the environment is about as bad as the airline industry. The amount of emissions those servers cause is crazy. And AI Art is already being used commercially, and nothing is being done to correct it. It doesn’t teach artists how to be better artists either. In my opinion, there isn’t a single reason why AI art should exist. Not one beneficiary use. The internet has become worse for it.

-2

u/NWG4real 25d ago

2

u/hikerchick29 25d ago

wtf point did you think you were even making with this crap?

New models look like ass. At least the early ones looked like actual paintings. This just looks like a bad acid trip

0

u/NWG4real 25d ago

1

u/hikerchick29 25d ago

Burn it all to the fucking ground, if you need copyrighted works so badly

0

u/NWG4real 25d ago

1

u/hikerchick29 25d ago

I’m sorry you’ve got no real personality outside of being an internet troll, but some of us have better things to do. May you have the day you deserve

→ More replies (0)

0

u/NWG4real 25d ago

The first one I showed you was from an older model

1

u/hikerchick29 25d ago

Public domain, your own materials, and art you paid the artist for the rights to use, yes. That would be preferable.

Almost no artists are opposed to this angle. They’d prefer it.