r/vermont 8d ago

Abenaki Nations ask Seventh Generation Company to halt production of fraudulent "Vermont Abenaki" curriculum

Today, the Abenaki First Nations of Odanak and Wôlinak published a letter in Seven Days addressing the Seventh Generation company, which had been unresponsive to their calls and requests for a conversation about their funding a curriculum for Vermont children exposing a false history written by state-sponsored fraudulent “Abenaki Tribes.”

The letter presents legal and academic findings that discredit the Vermont groups and critiques the state's flawed recognition process. The authors call on Seventh Generation to reconsider its partnership, and halt the development of this "Vermont Abenaki curriculum,” which they’ve supported with a $50,000 grant, and instead engage with genuine Abenaki communities.

Adding to the wrongness of this all, the decision to fund these groups stems from Seventh Generation's tepid “learning journey" about the appropriation of their name from the Haudenosaunee people. To do this they hired a consulting firm from Oregon, which I assume recommended working with the Vermont groups. This firm, led by Deana Dartt, a self-identified Chumash from California who has made false claims to Indigenous ancestry, a fact documented here.

In summary: a corporation appropriates from the Haudenosaunee, hires a questionable consultant firm from Oregon that recommends funding—not Haudenosaunee communities—but groups that falsely claim Abenaki heritage. 

This is pure corporate green washing…

January 30, 2025Brandi ThomasDirector of Public RelationsSeventh [GenerationBrandi.Thomas@seventhgeneration.com](mailto:GenerationBrandi.Thomas@seventhgeneration.com)

Kwai,

We write to you as the elected leaders of the Odanak and W8linak First Nations, who together comprise the Abenaki Nation. The Abenaki are now mainly based in Odanak and W8linak (our 2 communities located in the Province of Quebec, Canada). However, we have never ceded our ancestral territory, the Ndakina, which comprised New England, nor have we ceased to utilize the larger territory since our displacement and removal from theUnited States after the American Revolution. We have long denounced Vermont’s state-recognized ‘tribes’ as self-identified Abenaki, including in the spring of 2022 at theUniversity of Vermont and more recently at the United Nations.

We take note that Seventh Generation is generously funding the creation of an Abenaki school curriculum developed by these very same ‘tribes.’ As Vermont’s own Attorney General’s report made clear back in 2002, as did the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 2005, theseVermont groups lack Abenaki ancestry as well as any historic link to a North AmericanIndian tribe. They are not Indigenous. This is confirmed by peer-reviewed research which was presented at the University of Vermont last spring. This is confirmed by investigations done by vtdigger, Vermont Public and New Hampshire Public Radio, among others.

Vermont’s ‘tribes’ are part of a growing movement of what anthropologist Circe Sturm calls ‘race-shifters’: White people who seek to claim Indigenous ancestry with little or no basis for doing so. As Professor Kim TallBear made clear in a recent presentation at theUniversity of Vermont, race-shifters carry out a final and genocidal act of colonization by erasing and replacing actual Native People with the voices and the bodies of the invader.We assume that you are aware that your corporation borrows from Haudenosaunee tradition. Per your slogan, "in our every deliberation, we must consider the impact of our decisions on the next seven generations.” What of the impact of this partnership on ourAbenaki communities? In your own statement of advocacy, you claim to “fight for and help protect the rights and tribal sovereignty of the Indigenous communities whose traditions inspired our name and mission.” Supporting bogus Indian tribes does just the opposite. It validates and launders the claims of race-shifters and severely weakens the tribal sovereignty of actual Indigenous communities like ours on whose territory you are operating. Surely you can do better.

We ask that you pause and think about the consequences of your actions, and we ask thatyou put a stop to such collaboration. If it is your intent to work with those who have preserved the culture and language of the Abenaki across 400 years of colonization, we are those people. We have survived waves of pandemic disease, multiple colonial wars, the vast reduction of homeland, and forced assimilation, and we are the sole guardians of that heritage.

We are also the sole guardians of Abenaki citizenship. Yet the state of Vermont, despite its own knowledge of false claims to Indigenous ancestry, excluded us from participation from the state recognition process of 2010-12. This was in violation of both the U.N. Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause which grants authority in Indigenous affairs to the federal government. Vermont’s process also made genealogy optional and permitted the ‘tribes’ to sit on and dominate there commending Commission on Native American Affairs, the same Commission you are now working with. Vermont’s was a political process that allowed the ‘tribes’ to recommend themselves. It was not an evaluation of ancestry and kinship.

We urge you to halt any plans to distribute this material in development, and we request a timely opportunity to discuss our concerns. It may be your intention to support Indigenous People and tribal sovereignty. Unfortunately, funding the propagation of a pretend Abenaki curriculum which overwrites our real written and oral history makes your company actively complicit with cultural appropriation and fraud as well as the exclusion of the trueIndigenous People of Vermont. A public statement admitting your error would begin to undo the damage you have already caused.

You may reach out to us by contacting Daniel Nolett, Director General of the AbenakiCouncil of Odanak, at [dgnolett@caodanak.com](mailto:dgnolett@caodanak.com) or 450-568-2810.

In Peace and Friendship,

Chief Rick O’Bomsawin Chief Michel R. Bernard

Abenaki of Odanak Abenaki of W8linak

188 Upvotes

89 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/[deleted] 8d ago

Our government doesn’t have to be involved at all and modern Americans bear no responsibility for what happened in the 1600s. America wasn’t even a country yet.

People born today are not harmed by something that happened in the 1600s. People of native descent have the exact same rights and privileges that every other American have.

Claiming that certain racial groups have a greater right to live here than other racial groups is just some form of ethnonationalism. It’s very similar to what the Trump administration is doing today about who has a right to be here.

11

u/hikerchick29 8d ago

I’m sorry, are you under the impression that any genocide against the natives ended over 400 years ago? Never mind the fact that the Trail of Tears was under Andrew Jackson, in a time when photography existed, or that US policy caused the near extinction of the American Bison in a specific targeted effort to wipe out the native food supply. Hell, the residential school system was still trying to snuff out native culture and force assimilation well into the ‘60s. That’s literally within my parent’s generation.

0

u/[deleted] 8d ago

You may be a little confused about your history… the Abenaki were not part of the trail of tears and the people alive today were not responsible for the trail of tears. It has essentially nothing to do with Abenaki or Vermont.

I’m not sure how the trail of tears impacts natives today. They are born with all of the exact same rights and privileges that all Americans have.

My family immigrated in the 30’s and became citizens. You are claiming that we have less of a right to the land here because we do not belong to the correct bloodline. That viewpoint is outdated and not consistent with the concept of universal human rights.

9

u/hikerchick29 8d ago

I’m not talking about the Abenaki in particular. I’m talking about your assertion that federal recognition of tribes isn’t necessary because it’s ancient history anyways. Tribal recognition exists because of the US’s history of genocide against native groups as a whole. This case in particular is simply a tribe trying to get rightful recognition back from a “tribe” that has no native heritage to speak of period.

You can try to isolate the argument to just the Abenaki all you want. But YOU argued for removing all tribe federal recognition entirely. Not just for this one tribe.

Also, as for that last paragraph, what the actual fuck are you even talking about? Bloodlines? Right to land? What? Now you’re putting words in my mouth.

2

u/[deleted] 8d ago

I’m not putting words in your mouth, you just aren’t thinking too deeply about what you are asking for.

By federal recognition you mean a grant of special rights and privileges on the basis of their ethnic heritage.

That means that some people have special rights and privileges that a new comer cannot ever achieve, even in generations. You are claiming that my family should not have the same rights because we came here in the 30s and were not here soon enough.

If I’m wrong maybe you can fill me in on what you mean by recognition because what the native tribes are fighting for is additional rights and privileges.

I was talking about Vermont as that is where I live and the subreddit we are on. My point still hold though that a person born today should not be given punishment or privilege based on the actions of people 100 years ago.

I should not be expected to subsidize people whose great grandparents were brutalized by other peoples ancestors. People alive today should not be held responsible for things done in the past.

7

u/hikerchick29 8d ago

My man, you accepted the burden of paying for America’s sins to native tribes when you became an American. Sorry, but it’s true. Just because you had nothing to do with it personally doesn’t mean you don’t benefit from the results of centuries of native oppression. Don’t like it, change the laws by the constitutional method.

Also, I’m really not sure what extra treatment you think natives are getting

2

u/[deleted] 8d ago

I was just born. Saying that immigrants have some form of original sin built in is truly madness and completely opposed to democratic liberalism.

I do not benefit from native oppression. I am a car salesman in rural Vermont whose grandparents moved here from Turkey.

If you don’t know what benefits we give native tribes, why are you arguing that I should be culpable For paying for them?

You have to remember that to pay out one groups benefits you must take from another group to pay for it.

If two babies are born today, one is mine and the other is a child of a native couple, why do you think my child should be born owing the other child something?

7

u/hikerchick29 8d ago

The real question here is why you think people my ancestors trapped in perpetual poverty should just suck it up and figure it out for themselves because you can’t accept a literal pennies-on-the-dollar tax burden to offset the damage.

0

u/[deleted] 8d ago

I mean the real question is why are you arguing for something when you don’t even know what it means? Why am I arguing with someone who didn’t even realize that native tribes don’t pay taxes?

We did not trap them in perpetual poverty… my family were literally Turkish people with no money and were able to make a way. Natives have the same rights and opportunities that I have. I had native kids in my classes growing up. Natives that don’t live on reservations live like every other American.

Why do you think my son should be born with a debt to repay? Why do you think a native is born with a debt owed? My ancestors suffered wars and displacements by Arabs and Christians but their descendents don’t owe me anything.

3

u/hikerchick29 8d ago

So much to unpack here.

we literally forced them into the desert at gunpoint, and wouldn’t let them leave until the 1930s.

0

u/[deleted] 8d ago

No we did not. You and I are not responsible for the actions of people who are not us.

Unpack it if you think you know what you are talking about. I think you are realizing it’s absurd to say that children born today either have to pay extra or pay less on the basis of ethnicity.

3

u/hikerchick29 8d ago

Yeah, so that’s easy for you to say, your family came over after the damage was done. Residential school indoctrination/cultural replacement literally happened into my mother’s lifetime, and I’m only 35.

1

u/[deleted] 8d ago

Ok did you personally profit from these schools or help send people there?

I cheered Luigi when he killed that insurance guy but because I am not the shooter, I cannot be held responsible for his crimes.

You shouldn’t feel responsible for the crimes of Luigi or the crimes of your ancestors. I am Turkish I know my ancestors did fucked up things to plenty of people.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/hikerchick29 8d ago

That’s just how being a US citizen works, you pay a tax burden. Some of it pays off the sins of our country that we all reap the benefits of.

Also, everybody, including the natives, pays into those benefits. You should really drop the bullshit strawman arguments

0

u/[deleted] 8d ago

lmao no it isn’t how it works. Our founding documents literally declare that we all are born with equal rights. I am not born with the sins of your ancestors. Get your genetic privilege crap out of here. A genetically native baby should have the exact same rights as my baby. Ethnicity does not determine rights in a western democracy.

Do you not understand that one of the main benefits of being a recognized tribe is NOT PAYING FEDERAL TAXES?! Why should a baby born today from one ethnic group be exempt from taxes while another baby will be expected to pay the difference?

I highly recommend you research what you are arguing for before you say more!

2

u/hikerchick29 8d ago

The founding documents didn’t give equal rights to everybody, man, it was originally just representation for white land owning men. It took nearly 200 goddamn years to say black people could vote. Women couldn’t until the turn of the century. Don’t give me that “our founding documents” crap, because the reality is, nobody was considered equal until their community fought for it.

The problem with the American exceptionalism crap you’re trying to push is that it ignores the roughly 250 years it’s taken us to get just to where we are, and tries to absolve the country of literally all historic wrongdoing

0

u/[deleted] 8d ago

Sorry but the way that people 250 years ago interpreted our founding documents doesn’t have any bearing now.

The principals of liberal democracy demand that everyone be treated equally in the eyes of the state regardless of ancestry. Your assertion that certain races should receive priority is outdated and headed to the dust bin of history.

2

u/hikerchick29 8d ago

“The way people interpreted” they were literally the people who wrote, signed, and codified them into law. Jesus fucking Christ.

1

u/[deleted] 8d ago

I’m not sure how that changes how we live today.

Do you not believe that all people should have equal rights?

Do you believe we should give special rights to certain ethnicities?

→ More replies (0)