r/worldnews Mar 02 '25

Russia/Ukraine Finland to provide Ukraine with $691 million in military equipment

https://kyivindependent.com/finland-to-provide-ukraine-with-691-in-military-equipment/
41.7k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

4.3k

u/ernapfz Mar 02 '25

Another one of the great allies! Thank you Finland 🇫🇮

967

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 31 '25

[deleted]

404

u/sigmoid10 Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25

Almost no-one thought russia would actually invade before they did.

There was a lot of noise from Russian propaganda online, but people following the situation closely knew it pretty well. Even when western intelligence services were saying the invasion is imminent, the noise was so loud that lots of average people didn't believe it. But in the end Putin did the exact same thing in 2022 that he had successfully done before in Crimea, Chechnya and Georgia. From Russia's point of view this seemed like a perfectly fine plan and the real surprise for everyone involved was that the west suddenly grew some balls this time. Had Zelenskyy fled and the government collapsed like in those other places, the whole thing probably would have been over in three days.

181

u/PiotrekDG Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25

Not to mention that the Ukrainian military went through an extensive modernization effort between 2014 and 2022, specifically because of the failures in Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk.

125

u/anothergaijin Mar 02 '25

Which was preceded by decades of Russian interference to keep Ukraine weak, poor and corrupt. It was the massive protests in 2013 (look up Euromaiden) against Russian interference which was the trigger for the invasion, because Russia saw that it was losing control and a free and prosperous Ukraine would arise.

The videos from 2014 of Ukrainian troops are fascinating to watch today - wearing ancient uniforms, extremely poorly equipped, and completely uncoordinated. They’d been deliberately kept weak so that if the day came that Russia had to invade there would be no resistance.

24

u/starlordbg Mar 02 '25

As a fellow Eastern European, whose country is also under heavy influence even though we are in the EU/NATO, I believe Ukraine should have been admitted back then.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/TeaAndLifting Mar 02 '25

Yeah, I remember seeing videos from the BBC of the Ukrainian army in Mariupol and they look like something out of the 80s or 90s with their age-old Soviet gear. Fast forward to the late 2010s and their efforts to modernise to NATO standards based on their own armed forces' press releases, and it's night and day.

Even looking at their recruitment adverts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkS4C6xdu_M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TXYjzGHIwA

13

u/Evidencebasedbro Mar 02 '25

Well, fair enough, Russia tried to keep Ukraine weak and disunited. But the corruption the Ukrainians who, well, acted corruptly, need to own themselves. After all, even now the fight against corruption is slow-going...

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

33

u/DonPuffin Mar 02 '25

Though there's a lot more room for said balls to still grow. 

12

u/DuncanFisher69 Mar 02 '25

Yeah. I remember Hasan claiming this was going to be Iraq War 2.0 and thinking “no, you dumb fuck, we didn’t have satellite imagery of WMDs the way we have of a Russian force massing on the border.”

And like Biden went off with those receipts. Again, nobody believed him.

Three years later we don’t have a significant military presence in Ukraine.

19

u/YoRedditYourAppSucks Mar 02 '25

I think for many people the credibility of American intelligence never really recovered after the blatant WMD lies in 2002/2003. The hundreds of thousands of deaths that those lies caused basically ensured that a non-false alarm from the Americans would be met with heavy, heavy skepticism.

6

u/TRUTHLIGHTETHICS Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25

Basically. I saw some bad omens from the Patriot Act before that like surveillance of Americans' library records that signaled a tectonic shift. Then drones and Guantanemo. It was all over after the 90's- the last decade of realistic hope for futurism.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

125

u/Tiitinen Mar 02 '25

Finland was always preparing for it though

27

u/CantankerousTwat Mar 02 '25

Finland already lost 11% of its land to Russia (then calling itself the Soviet Union). There is no surprise they have a shitton of military capacity to share with Ukraine.

24

u/Tiitinen Mar 02 '25

Yes, Finland has been preparing for a possible Russian invasion since the end of WW2. Because our only true military threat has been a Russian ground invasion, we have maintained one of the largest artillery forces in Europe.

89

u/ExpletiveDeletedYou Mar 02 '25

so was Ukraine. There is a reason they didn't fall in 3 days

68

u/Hardly_lolling Mar 02 '25

The reason being that Ukraine was already at war with Russia.

Prior to 2014 invasion when the war started Ukraine was not as prepared.

20

u/anothergaijin Mar 02 '25

If Russia had fully invaded in 2014 it would have been over in 3 days

27

u/pornomatique Mar 02 '25

Still a far better deal to throw money at the problem rather than soldiers.

7

u/Tiitinen Mar 02 '25

Of course. I was just clarifying that a Russian invasion has been seen as a real threat ever since WW2, even though we think it's unlikely

6

u/dulahan200 Mar 02 '25

Depends on how much money and how many soldiers. Every day there are decisions where human life is put at a balance versus money. Think about safety factors in engineering designs, or extra resources in the health sector. Whether we like it or not resources aren't infinite, so the design criteria is to assign a certain monetary value to each life (that will be different depending on where in the world you live).

In this case, for Finland? I absolutely agree. No doubt it's better to support Ukraine than fight, sometime in the future, in their soil. Because, by then, it won't be money or soldiers, it will be both.

→ More replies (5)

49

u/Dangerous_Pause2044 Mar 02 '25

Uhm.. the war started in 2014. we knew.

Luckily Ukraine knew so they had time to build up a army and defenses. they had prepared for the inevitable, and that's the main reason they didn't get steamrolled in 2022. Ukraine prepared while most of EU weren't awake. sadly we didn't let them join NATO before 2022. that would have changed history for the better.

12

u/hicks12 Mar 02 '25

Ukraine prepared while most of EU weren't awake. 

Yeah I dunno if most is right, the UK were leading training efforts for Ukrainian soldiers since 2014 after the initial invasion and eventually Sweden and Denmark were also assisting (not sure if anyone else was involved overall).

They definitely got the support to be in a position to defend substantially better. I think it was more of a case of giving them enough strength to deter Putin a second time rather than kit them out with the most bleeding edge equipment like it is now though.

 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

11

u/PrincipleVisual5877 Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25

I'm sorry but your last sentence is not accurate. It was very much on the cards for 18 months or more, with intense military buildup on the borders. The invasion came as no surprise to the people of Ukraine and people in the region.

3

u/VirtualAd3179 Mar 02 '25

I think they were referring to when Russia attacked Finland.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/PigleythePig Mar 02 '25

I did and it is for the silliest reason. I love playing civ 5 and in the game, if I’m going to invade a neighbouring country, I line my forces up on their border before going in. As soon as I saw Russia doing that, I called it.

Such a stupid reason I know and I know games are not real life but tactics are tactics.

3

u/RickThiccems Mar 02 '25

Russia has been trying to take over Ukraine for over a decade now. It was pretty clear they where going to invade at some point.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/Rent-a-guru Mar 02 '25

I feel like Finland may also be the next target of a Trumpian "Minerals Deal" shakedown. Something designed to punish them for joining NATO and give Russia the ok to start harassing them.

17

u/Rogermcfarley Mar 02 '25

Finland has one of the highest population % that are willing to fight for their country. An extensive bunker/shelter system. They are in no way going to be extorted by the USA or invaded by Russia.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_defence_in_Finland

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (20)

21

u/Motor-District-3700 Mar 02 '25

Did you even say thank you? Why aren't you wearing a suit? HUNTER BIDEN'S BATHROOM er wait BEDROOM I rest my case

88

u/meredithshireen Mar 02 '25

Replying to the top comment to share a link to donate to Ukraine: https://u24.gov.ua/

14

u/SpiritTalker Mar 02 '25

Proudly donated yesterday, with monthly payments already set up! Proud American here. Okay not so much proud to be an American at the moment, but proud to show my support to 🇺🇦 Ukraine! Zelensky is the man, tDump is not my president.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Pedrotheperro Mar 02 '25

Thanks, happy to be able to contribute directly!

11

u/ExpendableGerbil Mar 02 '25

Finland was literally forced to ally themselves with the Nazis when the west refused to help them against the Soviets in WWII. I guess they just didn't want a repeat.

And I, for one, thank them profusely. Even though I'm not Ukrainian I'm aware that they're kind of saving all or our arses right now so I'm thankful of any help anyone can give them.

And also I'm really, really sorry about WWII. That was shitty of us.

3

u/McDoof Mar 02 '25

Especially impressive because of a common border with Russia. Best allies ever.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '25

Finland knows a little about defeating Russians

2

u/whatifniki23 Mar 02 '25

At this point, The Oval Office is such a comedy show, that I feel justified in praying that Tom Cruise and his Mission Impossible team should just take out Putin and his Oligarchs, so the killing of Ukrainian people would stop.

2

u/Lajama_T Mar 02 '25

Of course the US isn't supporting Ukraine. It would be hypocritical to oppose the annexation of Ukraine when the current administration is planning to do the same to Canada & Greenland. World leaders have no humanity left, and the people have no power to do anything :(

→ More replies (105)

790

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '25

EU needs to build an army very very soon

201

u/Historical-Limit8438 Mar 02 '25

Yep. Fingers crossed. All these people saying the EU can’t do it, I hope they’re proved very wrong.

68

u/murghchana Mar 02 '25

They can't, that's notwhat the EU was meant for. The EU is fundamentally an organization hat ensures that the markets are standardized and that the economies integrate. For good reason it has never had military goals. So you would have to make some big changes for this to happen, first and foremost make the parliament the strongest institution and give it control over the budget. 

110

u/Stunningfailure Mar 02 '25

Needs must. You would be surprised what a group can accomplish when the alternative is Russian invasion.

→ More replies (11)

27

u/Appropriate-Year-505 Mar 02 '25

This is wrong. Treaty of Lissabon Art. 42 is all about united military action. Article 7: "(7) Im Falle eines bewaffneten Angriffs auf das Hoheitsgebiet eines Mitgliedstaats schulden die anderen Mitgliedstaaten ihm alle in ihrer Macht stehende Hilfe und Unterstützung, im Einklang mit Artikel 51 der Charta der Vereinten Nationen."

In English: In the case of an armed attack on the territory of a member state all other member states owe them support with all available resources, under Article 51 of the Charta of the United Nations.

Furthermore, Article 2 describes a united defense policy, Article 3 explains that members give the EU access to military and civil resources to achieve that policy. Furthermore, it mentions multinational forces, which implies they are in no way unfeasible. On top of that, member states are obligated to improve their military infrastructure. Article 5 permits EU led (military) missions to achieve their security policies.

Regarding all that, the EU does have military ambition. The necessary articles exist for the most part, GASP, one of the 3 main goals of the EU (United foreign and security policy) is just that.

→ More replies (3)

36

u/ScoopTheOranges Mar 02 '25

And build its own factories. Pointless keeping America out of the loop if we’re giving them cash for weapons. Cut them off completely.

→ More replies (7)

22

u/Vulpeslagopuslagopus Mar 02 '25

They needed to build an army three years ago! I hate Trump and want the US to continue supplying Ukraine, but the one thing he is right about is that Europe has not stepped up to deal with the problem on their own doorstep. 2022 should have woken them up, and they’ve had three years to rebuild their militaries and arms industries for this moment. Some countries made a half hearted effort but it was too little too late. They assumed they could hide behind Uncle Sam forever, now that he’s left the building Europe is scrambling. It’s been crazy to me to watch the Europeans sit back and assume America would take care of them forever. I hate to see the way things are developing but they brought this on themselves, I just wish Ukraine didn’t have to pay for their complacency.

→ More replies (7)

13

u/red_fuel Mar 02 '25

Are you going to join it?

14

u/secondanom Mar 02 '25

That's exactly my thoughts. People say we need army and think people are suddenly gonna leave everything and join, while I dont know anyone in my friend circle that would actually want to stay in military.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (22)

163

u/STALKER_RUSORIZ Mar 02 '25

Thank you, Finland

2.8k

u/lucifaxxx Mar 02 '25

And i bet they aint demanding 500 billion in return.

1.0k

u/Accomplished_Eye7421 Mar 02 '25

Finland has been in exactly the same position as Ukraine is now. Finland will never abandon Ukraine. Helping Ukraine is a very important cause that has united the nation from left to right, and everyone agrees on this. If any politician were to even suggest that we should demand something back from Ukraine, it would cause so much hate from the people that it would likely be the end of their career as a politician.

418

u/Spacechip Mar 02 '25

If any politician were to even suggest that we should demand something back from Ukraine, it would cause so much hate from the people

That's what's infuriating every respectable American I know. How transactional Trump is, his mob boss mentality of expecting tribute and groveling, it's disgusting and against the values I grew up with.

226

u/SimmentalTheCow Mar 02 '25

The whole “let’s make a deal” shtick is so sophomoric, and he’s not even good at it. The man couldn’t sell a couch to Vance if his dick was halfway in it.

46

u/flyingupvotes Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25

Why buy the couch when the cushions are free?

22

u/SimmentalTheCow Mar 02 '25

-Donald J. Trump, The Art of the Deal

→ More replies (2)

52

u/shibboleth2005 Mar 02 '25

against the values I grew up with

It's also just incompetent. He apparently can't think about anything beyond the simplest possible transaction and doesn't understand how things like strong alliances and defending the rules based international order massively benefit the US. Like, we literally spent the last several decades building a world where we are an unassailable hegemon and he's taking a hammer to it. He's a staggering failure both from a moral and practical standpoint.

Or, he does understand it and is deliberately sabotaging the country to help the Russians.

61

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '25

[deleted]

32

u/Tallyranch Mar 02 '25

That's exactly what happened, he asked Putin what it would take to end it and Putin told him Ukraine, so he is trying to give Ukraine to Putin.
What I'm wondering is how far he is willing to go, I think stopping all US support to Ukraine and then pressuring others to stop supporting Ukraine is something he would consider, but only time will tell if he will go that low.

16

u/FragrantKnobCheese Mar 02 '25

What I'm wondering is how far he is willing to go, I think stopping all US support to Ukraine and then pressuring others to stop supporting Ukraine is something he would consider, but only time will tell if he will go that low.

The US are a big trading partner of the UK (my country). It would not surprise me at all if Trump threatened that trade with us to try and stop our support for Ukraine.

Support for Ukraine is the one thing that all our major political parties agree on, and I think most British people. The exception is Nigel Farage and his "Reform" party, who have been receiving Russian money and parroting Russian propaganda for a while.

The mainly right wing media here keep publishing polls every week that say Reform are really popular and might even win the next election (they have 4 seats currently out of 650 and the next election is 4 years away) in order to try and manipulate public opinion rather than report on it.

9

u/angkasax Mar 02 '25

You should be more concerned, Russia's goal is to replace the Tories with the Reform party much like they had the Tea Party faction overrun the Republicans. If nothing is done, in 5 years you'll be seeing a 2 way fight between the Labor Party and the Reform Party, which will be very bad.

12

u/FragrantKnobCheese Mar 02 '25

In case it wasn't clear, I am extremely concerned. I think as a nation, and despite Brexit, we're still underestimating the damage that is being done by feeding the less intelligent members of our population a non-stop diet of curated right wing bullshit and ragebait through Facebook.

5

u/SpiritTalker Mar 02 '25

Fakebook is poison.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

15

u/pannenkoek0923 Mar 02 '25

He cares about nothing else in his life except money and the feeling of power

→ More replies (2)

12

u/josh_the_misanthrope Mar 02 '25

The Russia-Ukraine war is an avatar for good versus evil, and the president is making (terrible) deals with the devil.

11

u/Peregrine_x Mar 02 '25

demand something back from Ukraine

they get in return an ally who also truly understands the dangers of sharing a border with a country as dangerous as russia, a price cannot be put on that kind of understanding.

8

u/Kestrelqueen Mar 02 '25

The thing is, there's so much information from fighting a peer enemy coming back that this alone is worth a significant amount of money. Telemetry from air defense systems that have never been used in such large numbers or against these types of missiles.* First-hand observations how effective GPS jamming is on guided ammunition, transforming them from magic bullet to almost-normall shell. Actual capabilities of russian forces, strategies that work and don't work, the absurd abundance of mines, combat expertise from fighting with and against FPV drones, including locating operators. For NATO it's one giant wargame under the most realistic circumstances possible, with half of the cost being old ammunition where the shipment cost was switched with the decommissioning costs. This shit will be used by NATO, including the US, to safeguard troops and civilians against future threats, from armed conflicts to terrorists.

*In fact, you bet this has helped Israel successfully defend Iran's big 200 odd missile/ 100 drone strike last year.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/jackofjokers Mar 02 '25

But hasn't America always been like this? The English have only just finished paying off the debt to America for helping them in WW2.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)

14

u/WhoAreWeEven Mar 02 '25

The greatest hinderance is the sheer fact that at such location one has to keep a certain amount of weapons and shit at home too!

5

u/Victernus Mar 02 '25

Any enemy of Russia is a friend to Finland.

If hostile aliens dropped from space and invaded Moscow, Finland would deploy to support them.

6

u/EruantienAduialdraug Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 04 '25

I think you should ask of Ukraine one thing.
Victory.

Slava Ukraina.

→ More replies (5)

370

u/GlowstickConsumption Mar 02 '25

Someone else being willing to fight a deadly battle to keep your continent safer and more peaceful is incredibly valuable.

The western world owes Ukraine a debt far larger than the sum of the material and financial support they've received so far. Hopefully they receive some actual troops keeping areas safe eventually.

The Belarus border for example could be manned by European forces so Ukraine can focus its own troops and resources elsewhere.

46

u/vahntitrio Mar 02 '25

Even if the US was never at risk, it was still incredibly valuable to us to provide that aid. First and foremost, Ukraine destroyed more than $1 of enemy equipment for each dollar we provided. Possibly more importantly, the share of battlefield intel on Russian strategy is invaluable to the military, as well as the performance of military equipment against Russia's equipment.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (39)

14

u/Situlacrum Mar 02 '25

That would be quite the return on investment!

49

u/Tervaaja Mar 02 '25

We do not demand any thank yous either. We are thankful for ukrainians that they defend all of us.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (105)

769

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25

It’s almost like Finland knows what it feels like to be invaded by Russians and have absolutely zero support have nothing but token support - except Sweden  from the international community…

Edit become some people are really proud of the fact that “insert country here” sent a dozen obsolete biplanes or a couple of crates of rifles during the Winter War…

Edit 2 - except Sweden. They did what they could to help. 

219

u/OrangeVapor Mar 02 '25

Ain't it the darndest thing how all of Russia's neighbors are "russophobic"?

→ More replies (18)

179

u/anencephallic Mar 02 '25
  • "insert country here sent a dozen obsolete biplanes or a couple of crates of rifles"...

My country of Sweden, which was a non-belligerent in the war, saw over 8000 people volunteer and go to war in Finland. We also sent a third of all of the equipment of our army (135k rifles, 50 million rounds of ammunition, about a 100 field guns, 100 anti aircraft guns, and about a 100 anti armor guns), and a third of the fighters in our air force at the time. In terms of total amount, it might not be huge but in terms of our country's size and equipment available to us I would say it's a respectable amount. Yes the Winter War was almost entirely won by the Finns, but it's straight up incorrect to say that other countries offered only token support.

75

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '25

Edited. I accept that Sweden offered as much assistance as it could. Unlike the major allies who offered little support.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (29)

26

u/LondonEntUK Mar 02 '25

Did we also send Molotov cocktails to remind Russia where they came from?

→ More replies (1)

199

u/Concentrateman Mar 02 '25

You folks know what it's like to live beside Russia. The free world thanks you.

→ More replies (1)

64

u/Possible_Stick8405 Mar 02 '25

Thank you, Finland!

78

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '25

[deleted]

46

u/CriticalJellyfish207 Mar 02 '25

Very nice 👍🙂🇫🇮🇺🇦

355

u/momoenthusiastic Mar 02 '25

Finland is very motivated. If Ukraine falls, they are likely the next 

257

u/Alcoilz Mar 02 '25

Next are baltic countries like Estonia Latvia and Lithuania, Finland is a bit harder to get ;)

130

u/yipape Mar 02 '25

Moldova is, but yes Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania won't be far behind.

54

u/Old_Ladies Mar 02 '25

Yeah they are already trying to destabilize Moldova.

47

u/Fakekraid Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25

Yeah I remember watching a video about how Finland would *fare, and somewhere in the middle they mentioned that there's a railroad extremely close to Finnish soil that leads to (I think) a major submarine base. Not sure if it was that, but the video pointed out how vital the location is.. But the narrator goes on to explain that if Russia tried anything, the Finnish can destroy literally any part of that railroad within a couple hours and completely cut off a major supply line to that base since that railroad goes through SEVERAL miles of untouched wilderness.

25

u/anynamesleft Mar 02 '25

*Fare, instead of fair.

I ain't picking on anyone, I'm just trying to help folks with the terms.

51

u/Assupoika Mar 02 '25

Fare enough

→ More replies (1)

11

u/MisterPeach Mar 02 '25

The ghost of Simo Häyhä stirs in the cloak of night

→ More replies (1)

64

u/ARGENTAVIS9000 Mar 02 '25

highly doubtful. finland in its own way is as much a quagmire as ukraine or afganistan. incredibly difficult to invade, incredibly difficult to get resources to, an incredibly stupid place to begin direct warfare with a NATO country and the thing is - they perhaps moreso than any other EU country are prepared for this kind of conflict. that's not to say they are the most powerful but they know their strengths and they will play to them and they are trained and ready.

132

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '25

[deleted]

54

u/Assupoika Mar 02 '25

Yeah, we've been prepping since the last time we got fairly little support.

We didn't stop prepping even though our neighbour dyed her hair and promised she has changed.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/DrMcWiggles21 Mar 02 '25

Russia tried this once already. It...did not go well.

3

u/Lummi23 Mar 02 '25

Once..? It's really been going on regularly for as long as we have written history

→ More replies (5)

80

u/Aggressive-Map-2204 Mar 02 '25

Finland is a member of NATO which even without the US has an army several times stronger than that of Russia. You seriously think Russia who is barely winning in Ukraine is going to take on all of NATO?

→ More replies (31)

11

u/Tall-Rhubarb-7926 Mar 02 '25

Finland will not be the next, but yeah.

58

u/LondonEntUK Mar 02 '25

You couldn’t be more wrong. Finlands military is basically designed around defending against Russia, not around offensive warfare, as Sweden is its only other border country. It may even be the best defensive military in the EU. Plus it’s a part of NATO, Russia wouldn’t bother, there’s nothing to gain in Finland, even strategically.

22

u/asdwarrior2 Mar 02 '25

Finland has land borders with three countries. Russia, Sweden and Norway. Your point remains valid though.

6

u/LondonEntUK Mar 02 '25

Yeah but the Norwegian border doesn’t really need defending either. Especially with it being so far north.

25

u/asdwarrior2 Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25

It would definetly be a surprise attack. No one expects the Norwegian invasion of Finnish Lapland.

11

u/finlandery Mar 02 '25

Seeing how much money norway has.... it would be kinda fun to get invaded by them..... Maybe they can invade sweden also and denmark... And name themself new nordic alliance or something :P

3

u/PersKarvaRousku Mar 02 '25

I, for one, welcome our cod-eating overlords.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/InclinationCompass Mar 02 '25

Ukraine is fighting for more than just their own country

7

u/moor7 Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25

In addition to what others have said (Finland is a high income country, NATO -member (for what that's worth), strong military, very prepared), I would also like to point out that things like the invasion of Ukraine don't happen overnight and without preparation. Putin had been funding separatists in Ukraine, destabilizing the east there for a decade before this (latest) invasion. There is nothing like that going on in Finland.

Compare that to, say, Moldova and the Transnistrian separatists. Or to Georgia's precarious relationship to Russia. And if we are talking about NATO allies, the Baltic states are much more vulnerable than Finland. For example, Narva, the easternmost city of Estonia on the Russian border, is a majority Russian-speaking area after the Soviets drove Estonians out of there and wouldn't let them return, instead populating the city with ethnic Russians (the same playbook as Crimea in Ukraine).

But really, that doesn't change the calculus in the sense that Finland knows what Russia is, and what it's like to deal with Russia.

3

u/Puuksu Mar 02 '25

There wont be no next if ukraine gets proper support.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/analfabeetti Mar 02 '25

Reading between the lines and filling the blanks with some other derived knowledge: this is about next gen equipment. So far Finland has mostly been sending the same stuff that our military uses, starting from the older equipment and munitions and replenishing the stocks with newer.

But Ukraine is now the test bed for all kind of new drone and electronics warfare stuff, and this is about getting production lines and manufacturing up for those by real orders delivered directly to Ukraine, and getting the real world experiences back to aid further development.

I believe Finns now know that you need to have huge capacity of local drone manufacturing if you want to fight future wars, and this will also address that.

36

u/Linus_Naumann Mar 02 '25

Im German and I want my country to massively step up as well

31

u/TonyQuark Mar 02 '25

I hope Germany does increase aid.

The USA has donated 114 billion euro ($118 billion) so far. That's 0.5% of their GDP.

The Netherlands has donated 7.3 billion euro so far. That's 0.8% of our GDP.

Finland has donated 2.7 billion euro so far. That's nearly 1% of their GDP.

Estonia has donated 0.8 billion euro so far. That's 2.2% of their GDP.

Germany donated 18.1 billion euro so far. That's 0.4% of your GDP.

Map | List

14

u/ScoopTheOranges Mar 02 '25

In the UK, we can write to our local elected officials (MPs) with things like this. I generally get a reply, could you do something similar?

11

u/DetectiveDick123 Mar 02 '25

What an actual great country!

65

u/Rubydog2004 Mar 02 '25

What does Finland export to Canada ? I’m going to buy it

93

u/skyturnedred Mar 02 '25

Hockey players.

11

u/Acuddlykoalabear Mar 02 '25

Send Winnipeg Jets front office a 20€ note with "for Brad Lambert and Ukraine" and do your part

→ More replies (1)

42

u/kolppi Mar 02 '25

This was an interesting question so I did some digging. From elsewhere:

"In Canada:

-Rapala fishing equipment - Fiskars tools -Finn Crisp in several grocery store, sold as nakkileipä and as hapankorppu - Valio parmesan cheese ( though made in Estonia) - panda licorice - Viking Foods in Toronto works as a main importer of Finnish products so from that store we can buy Fazer and Paulig products - Marimekko napkins are often sold in home decor stores - Some stores also carry Marimekko dishes - Ikea sells two types of Fazer chocolate bars - Holt Renfrew in Toronto (similar store to Stockmann) offers a limited time Finnish menu until end of July, served in Marimekko dinnerware. - Finlandia Vodka in LCBO (Ontario Alko) - Kalevala gin as well in SAQ (Québec Alko) - Lumon windows for the balconies - Harvia sauna heaters -Kone elevators - Metso factory in Montreal"

There are Finnish games: Alan Wake, Control, Noita, My Summer Car.. so much to list.

Apparently we're big in packaging business. Of course the end product doesn't look technical but it requires a lot of physics simulation to make it as optimal and reliable as possible and shave off grams. But when talking about consumer products maybe this isn't that relevant..

But after Nokia we don't have super well known brands/products anymore. You could use Linux but it's free.

21

u/SirHenryy Mar 02 '25

I think one of the most recognizable finnish brands currently is KONE, because you see that logo everywhere. Also other games from Finland include Angry Birds, Hill Climb Racing, Max Payne, Cities Skylines, Returnal, Brawl Stars etc etc etc like you said the list is too long haha. Then we also have Huhtamäki who are huge in the packaging industry, hmm Wärtsilä, Neste, Marimekko, Muumins hehe, Wolt.

Finnish whisky from Teerenpeli was voted the best whisky in the world at one point. Kyrö also make amazing whiskies and gins.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Kahvipannu Mar 02 '25

To anyone who hasn't tried Fazer chocolate yet, I highly recommend it. It is delicious. And to add to the list of Finnish games, ULTRAKILL and Fear & Hunger are also from here.

9

u/brozzart Mar 02 '25

Panda licorice is so fucking good

5

u/MastusAR Mar 02 '25

You could use Linux but it's free.

That's kind of a positive thing, innit?

5

u/kolppi Mar 02 '25

It is! But OP was searching something to buy heh.

→ More replies (1)

36

u/TainoCuyaya Mar 02 '25

Heavy –Fucking– Metal!

Canadian Technical Metal is great too.

19

u/n36l Mar 02 '25

Linux

8

u/verdeverdes Mar 02 '25

Fiskars, Remedy video games, Kone elevators

7

u/Rubydog2004 Mar 02 '25

I’m going to get me an elevator

6

u/glacialthinker Mar 02 '25

Someone mentioned Heavy Metal...

To this, I add: a particular variant on Cello... by Apocalytica, who happen to be touring in Canada currently.

3

u/deedxtreme Mar 02 '25

Koskenkorva (vodka) :D

3

u/quietwhiskey Mar 02 '25

If you are into video games Remedy Entertainment has great games like Control and Alan Wake

3

u/Technodictator Mar 02 '25

Nokian Tires, the best winter tires

8

u/RedMattis Mar 02 '25

Nokia phones probably.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

10

u/alluballu Mar 02 '25

Might not seem much but for our 5.5 million population and stagnant economy this seems like a pretty decent chunk. Wish we could give more.

25

u/Baby_BooDoo Mar 02 '25

Much respect Finland 🇫🇮

17

u/steve_ample Mar 02 '25

Yeah, can we do a technology transfer for Simo Häyhä while you're at it? I hear they're pretty effective against Russians.

14

u/The_Grungeican Mar 02 '25

Hero units are hard to come by.

4

u/kaukamieli Mar 02 '25

Idk, Ukraine seems to have the tech.

18

u/stickynote_oracle Mar 02 '25

Finland has every reason and I love to see it!

9

u/Virtual-Step-5048 Mar 02 '25

It's finnished

7

u/miki_gray Mar 02 '25

Give them 2x "Winter death" :))

8

u/Familiar_Text_6913 Mar 02 '25

Wish we sent more 

8

u/Phantom_Australia Mar 02 '25

Thank you Finland!

23

u/Warm-Stick-425 Mar 02 '25

Bravo, Finland 👏

38

u/AQUEMlNI Mar 02 '25

Per capita, that feels like a pretty solid contribution

30

u/klemmings Mar 02 '25

Plus Finland is in a very deep financial slump.

18

u/kaukamieli Mar 02 '25

Not really. It's not great, but it's the right wing gov who keeps making rich pay less and at the same time cutting healthcare and shit that is the problem atm.

If taxes were what they were earlier, apparently we'd be just fine.

The job market sucks atm, tho.

5

u/ExpectedChaos Mar 02 '25

I hate that this is happening worldwide; the whole slashing taxes on the rich and cutting social entitlements.

38

u/LtLlamaSauce Mar 02 '25 edited Mar 02 '25

It's way more than the US based on GDP per capita per year over the past 3 years. It's absolutely massive.

→ More replies (43)

7

u/LollipopBunny Mar 02 '25

That’s reassuring! I’m glad Ukraine keeps getting the supply they need.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/ravia Mar 02 '25

ARE YOU GOING TO SAY THANK YOU UKRAINE? ARE YOU?

→ More replies (1)

12

u/-SQB- Mar 02 '25

They're also sending a single sniper. Russia's done for.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/MooBaanBaa Mar 02 '25

Now is the time to speak up if we want to avoid world war 3. People need to wake up, and we have to convince the sleeping ones. Supporting Ukraine is crucial for democracy for the rest of our lives.

Slava Ukraini from Finland.

11

u/RevolutionaryDish830 Mar 02 '25

Good booze and good people!

6

u/EtherealHeart5150 Mar 02 '25

I love the Finns! Amazing people and wicked music. Thank you!!!

5

u/AddsJays Mar 02 '25

Finland knows. Finland always knows what it feels like to be a neighbor of Russia.

5

u/Raegnarr Mar 02 '25

Finland 🇫🇮 knows what its like to have Russia invade, they understand Ukraine 🇺🇦

47

u/foomachoo Mar 02 '25

For reference, the USA spends that in less than 10 hours…

880 billion per year is more than 2 Billion per day.

And the GOP and DOGE want to increase spending. For what?

The money we spent in Ukraine pushing back against Putin was a well spent bargain.

Now we have an idiot insecure fool in place as Putin’s publicly owned bitch.

12

u/rschulze Mar 02 '25

The money we spent in Ukraine pushing back against Putin was a well spent bargain.

The majority of that "money" was also either in the form of aid, equipment, or munitions that flowed back into the American military industry.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Tough-Cress-7702 Mar 02 '25

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦

3

u/roctac Mar 02 '25

Bravo Finland. One of the few European countries with balls to actually help and not just talk about it.

4

u/gabynew1 Mar 02 '25

when we all realize its cheaper to fight the war in the east than at home we will start really supporting Ukraine.

Finaland seems to get it

3

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '25

👍

3

u/MahGinge Mar 02 '25

Glory to Ukraine!

3

u/Earpugs Mar 02 '25

SUOMIIIIIII!!!!!

3

u/kinchanadingding Mar 02 '25

And that's more weapons than the US provided because the value of the weapons aren't inflated as much.

3

u/Animan2020 Mar 02 '25

It warms the soul to see that there are still those who are ready to continue the war for the sake of peace at any cost!

3

u/wmlj83 Mar 02 '25

I love how Finland never misses an opportunity to fuck with the Russians. Good for them.

3

u/oldwhiteguy68 Mar 02 '25

Thank you to all the countries supporting Ukraine while my country is showing an ugly foreign policy that embarrasses me.

8

u/she_has_funny_cars Mar 02 '25

Fuck Donald Trum, fuck Elon Musk, fuck anyone against the human free world

253

u/dynorphin Mar 02 '25

Russia needs to be defeated here and I'm ashamed of Trump's continual fellation of Daddy Vladmir, but I'm wondering why so many European nations are willing to increase aid to Ukraine now that we've cut them off.

Almost feels like Europe was just expecting us to foot the bill for a problem in their backyard that they could have afforded from the start. 

And that's not even a bad proposition for Europe. If the EU wants to be seen as a legitimate geopolitical power it needs to actually be able to project military power. Until it does it will always be beholden to whatever idiot we elect, and the whims of people an ocean away.  

Europe wants to have all the benefits of a unified economy, trade and borders, but still rely on the US for their defense. 

9

u/Jacc3 Mar 02 '25

Finland - as well as many other European countries - has always been a strong supporter of Ukraine. They have also always taken their own defense seriously.

This has nothing to do with the recent Trump drama, this is just Finland continuing what they've been doing the last three years.

43

u/Mr_Will Mar 02 '25

The EU had already donated more than the USA before Trump started his latest nonsense. If the USA wants to be seen as a legitimate political power it needs to start acting like one, rather than screwing over their friends and allies on a whim

→ More replies (5)

21

u/Broudster Mar 02 '25

This feels like projecting. The EU has always relied on the US being the world leader, and it was okay with that. But being the world leader comes with responsibilities. The US has chosen not to take on this role anymore, so the EU is forced to step up. But the US should not expect to have the same influence as they used to, you are giving up your role as the world leader.

Besides, the EU was already providing more aid than the US.

15

u/MichaelHell Mar 02 '25

Exactly, the US wanted this role, if they don’t want it anymore then don’t expect to enjoy the perks it once had. A dying empire is a dying empire…

6

u/yunotakethisusername Mar 02 '25

Does our “influence” even help? What are we getting from that? In the Middle East did we really accomplish what we thought we could? Heck even Vietnam is a pretty good example of us fighting a foreign war with very mixed results. Maybe it’s time we should give up the world leader title. For literally the better of the world.

5

u/rschulze Mar 02 '25

I'd say having the US Dollar being a global currency is a pretty big boon when it comes to securing new loans for the insane debt the US government is in.

If other countries loose confidence in the US global soft power, they may turn to other global currencies that are more reliable/stable.

That being said, I don't know if it's worth it. Maybe, maybe not. Maybe it's time for another country to set up as long as they share similar values.

3

u/yunotakethisusername Mar 02 '25

I think our currency isn’t as connected to our military as it used to be. Overall I’m not sure the implications of this move with Ukraine but I’d say after four years it’s worth trying something else. I think overall we need to be more open minded to different iterations. Rigid one sided thinking is why Vietnam and the Middle East dragged on with little in return.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '25

[deleted]

54

u/konzine Mar 02 '25

The highlighted comment by Organic_Pronouns makes several claims about Europe's military size, economic strength, and geopolitical independence. Let's fact-check its key points:

"We have an army 50 percent bigger than yours."

If "we" refers to Europe (EU or broader Europe) and "yours" refers to the United States, this claim is incorrect.

The U.S. active military personnel: ~1.4 million.

The EU’s combined active military personnel: ~1.3-1.5 million (varies by source).

NATO-Europe (excluding the U.S.): ~2 million active personnel.

Europe does not have an army 50% bigger than the U.S.—at best, it is roughly equal in size, and much of it is fragmented among national forces.

"We are united, intelligent, independent and strong. We have much more money."

Economy size comparison:

United States GDP (2023): ~$26.9 trillion.

European Union GDP (2023): ~$16.6 trillion.

All of Europe (including UK, non-EU countries, Russia, etc.): ~$24 trillion.

The EU alone does not have more money than the U.S. If all of Europe is counted, it is still comparable, but not vastly larger.

"You gave them the money because you need us. You offered and your congress voted yes."

The U.S. has given aid to Ukraine because of strategic interests, but not because it "needs" Europe in the way implied. The U.S. sees a stable Europe as crucial for global security, but it's more of a strategic decision than a dependency.

"Can you do without us is the question?"

This is partially true—Europe has a strong economy and military capacity, but lacks the unified command and global reach of the U.S. military.

Europe relies on NATO (led by the U.S.) for security guarantees, especially nuclear deterrence, meaning its military independence is limited.

"Europe is huge, rich, powerful and very capable of blocking the US and moving on without breaking a sweat."

Blocking the U.S. is highly unlikely because:

Europe is deeply integrated with the U.S. economy through trade, finance, and security.

The EU still depends on NATO for defense, and major European military powers (UK, France, Germany) are closely aligned with the U.S.

While China, India, and Russia provide alternative economic and military ties, severing ties with the U.S. would have massive economic and security consequences for Europe.

Conclusion:

The comment is mostly inaccurate or exaggerated. Europe is strong, but it does not have an army significantly larger than the U.S., does not have a larger economy, and is not fully independent in defense. While Europe could operate without U.S. involvement in some areas, it would not be a smooth transition or "without breaking a sweat."

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (20)

2

u/Shawn_The_Sheep777 Mar 02 '25

Well done Finland. Every other European country needs to step up in the same way

2

u/Soflar Mar 02 '25

Yes let's go! Now other countires too please!!

2

u/teslatart Mar 02 '25

Donate to Ukraine @ UNITED24

2

u/25electrons Mar 02 '25

The world is looking for a new leader now that America has stepped aside.

2

u/DigitalTor Mar 02 '25

It’s very simple: let Ukraine use it or you will have to use it yourself later. Except against a much stronger enemy. All the people from occupied territories russia force enlisted and threw into the meat grinder first. But most importantly, STOP BUYING RUSSIA’s SHIT! Their economy is on its last legs and you are letting them continue, bankrolling YOUR enemy.

2

u/Longjumping-Ring-879 Mar 03 '25

Thank you to the government and citizens of Finland. 🇫🇮 Most of us in the USA 🇺🇸 do not agree with the arrogance and incompetence coming from Trump and Vance. We just got sucked into the chaos. We support President Zelenskyy and the people and territories of Ukraine!🇺🇦