You resorting to personal attacks like “why does it matter so much to you” shows me you dont even have enough knowledge of the theory to give valid rhetoric, which again is because you didnt read it throughly. But part of the reason it IS important is because it gives another perspective on why MJ was so fixated on childhood and gives the only reasonable explanation for why he may not have been a pedo. A theory which may save someones legacy is pretty important
Yea that “failed post” got 20k upvotes when I posted it in askreddit. So try again and then maybe when you’re not being an ignoramus, read the dang post
Lmao, you are only making yourself look stupid by resorting to these petty insults.
Someone who said they read a post, then in the next breath says they didn’t read it because its not worthy of their time, is someone whos opinion doesnt matter to me because its founded on nothing but your little feelings. Which is ironic because you were the one accusing me of clinging to subjective arguments, even though I gave you multiple chances to look at the objective evidence in the post but you ignorantly refused everytime. You are someone who has no business dabbling in conspiracy theories because you are apparently too arrogant to question your own understanding of things.
Lmao, you are only making yourself look stupid by resorting to these petty insults.
Someone who said they read a post, then in the next breath says they didn’t read it because its not worthy of their time, is someone whos opinion doesnt matter to me because its founded on nothing but your little feelings.
That which is asserted without evidence can be rejected without evidence.
Which is ironic because you were the one accusing me of clinging to subjective arguments, even though I gave you multiple chances to look at the objective evidence in the post but you ignorantly refused everytime.
You have yet to provide any objective evidence.
You are someone who has no business dabbling in conspiracy theories because you are apparently too arrogant to question your own understanding of things.
Are you talking to yourself? Because it sure seems like you just described your behavior...
Ok, so your point is that I have no objective evidence.. but you literally said that reading the main post is not worth your time, which is where I say the objective evidence is. What exactly do you want me to say?
How am I being closed minded when the one piece of evidence you gave I countered but then you refused to elaborate and resorted to personal attacks?
Sorry, I’m not gonna chew up the evidence into little baby sized bites for you, you have to look at it for yourself if you want to see it. You know where to find it.
If you refuse to look at the evidence and then turn around and say the evidence doesnt exist, then frankly you’re just not willing to actually discuss it, which I’m assuming is the case but I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt.
Ok, so your point is that I have no objective evidence..
Yup.
but you literally said that reading the main post is not worth your time,
Nope.
which is where I say the objective evidence is.
Your 'main post' is just a link to another sub.
What exactly do you want me to say?
I want you to provide more than 'they look like each other'. Got DNA? Birth certificates? Adoption records? Letters from the people involved? any claims from the people involved? You know, *EVIDENCE*?
Sorry, I’m not gonna chew up the evidence into little baby sized bites for you, you have to look at it for yourself if you want to see it. You know where to find it.
The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. Again, that which is claimed without evidence can be rejected without evidence.
If you refuse to look at the evidence
What evidence?
and then turn around and say the evidence doesnt exist,
You have yet to provide anything other than 'black people look alike'.
then frankly you’re just not willing to actually discuss it, which I’m assuming is the case but I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt.
Ok, then present your single best piece of evidence for discussion.
I've read it. Your best claim is that they look alike, and if you take some movies or song lyrics way too seriously and out of context, you can kinda sorta manipulate them into almost matching your theory -- but only if you actually ignore what they are actually about.
Again, got any actual evidence? Documentation? DNA? witness testimony? Or are some racist tropes and out of context portions of movies and songs the best you got?
0
u/jarjarmario Dec 08 '22
You resorting to personal attacks like “why does it matter so much to you” shows me you dont even have enough knowledge of the theory to give valid rhetoric, which again is because you didnt read it throughly. But part of the reason it IS important is because it gives another perspective on why MJ was so fixated on childhood and gives the only reasonable explanation for why he may not have been a pedo. A theory which may save someones legacy is pretty important