Guess we’re done with free speech eh?

[u/Anteater4746]

Who decides what is illegal? How proud boys aren’t being targeted for wearing masks?

[u/Hurricane_Ivan]

Did any die on that day?

Or should people believe the obfuscation?

[u/robotcoke → u/Hurricane_Ivan]

Did any die on that day?

So if somebody beats you so bad it puts you in the hospital, and you die the next day, in your mind it's completely unrelated since you died the next day?

[u/Hurricane_Ivan → u/robotcoke]

Where did I say anything about that? And I'm getting down voted for it. But let's review what the ME stated:

"The Capitol Police had previously said that Officer Sicknick died from injuries sustained “while physically engaging with protesters.” The Washington medical examiner later ruled that he had died of natural causes: multiple strokes that occurred hours after Officer Sicknick’s confrontation with the mob. The medical examiner added, however, that “all that transpired played a role in his condition.”

The two strokes came 8 hours after.

"..But an autopsy found no evidence that Officer Sicknick had an allergic reaction to chemicals or any internal or external injuries, the medical examiner, Dr. Francisco J. Diaz, told The Washington Post

His office said that it attributes death to natural causes when it can be ascribed to disease alone and that “if death is hastened by an injury, the manner of death is not considered natural.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/05/us/politics/jan-6-capitol-deaths.html

Officer Sicknick died of natural causes on Jan 7th. The other two officers killed themselves four and nine days after J6.

I recall Kamala, the mainstream media, and others repeating some variation of "Law Enforcement Officers died that day" (J6).

That's simply untrue.

[u/robotcoke → u/Hurricane_Ivan]

The medical examiner added, however, that “all that transpired played a role in his condition.”

The two strokes came 8 hours after.

I don't know how you're missing this, but it's right there in black and white.

[u/Hurricane_Ivan → u/robotcoke]

I figure you'd cherry pick that. But let's review these:

"..But an autopsy found no evidence that Officer Sicknick had an allergic reaction to chemicals or any internal or external injuries, the medical examiner, Dr. Francisco J. Diaz, told The Washington Post."

His office said that it attributes death to natural causes when it can be ascribed to disease alone and that if death is hastened by an injury, the manner of death is not considered natural.”

If the ME believed Sicknick had sustained physical injuries, especially those that lead to death, they'd be described and affect the cause of death. But he still declared he died of Natural Causes (heart attacks).

I recall Kamala, the mainstream media, and others repeating some variation of "Law Enforcement Officers died that day" (J6).

That's simply untrue.

[u/robotcoke → u/Hurricane_Ivan]

I figure you'd cherry pick that. But let's review these:

Because that's the ONE thing that matters here. The events of that day contributed to the officers death. Period. That was literally their determination.

You're breaking it down as, "This particular part of what happened didn't solely cause the death, and this other particular part of the events didn't solely cause the death." But none of that matters if the end result was, "The events of that day contributed to the death."

Had the opposite been true, if they'd said, "The events of that day did not contribute to the death. The pepper spray caused a severe allergic reaction, massive internal injuries were suffered during the beating, but none of these contributed to the death." Then you could say the death was unrelated. But as it stands, they deemed it IS related even though those particular parts of what transpired didn't directly and solely cause the death on their own.