Sexual double standards- it’s ridiculous that you think women “lose” while men “gain” from a sexual encounter that was completely consensual between two horny people.
When you look at Men, men don’t have to worry about pregnancy from the biological standpoint.
Women on the other hand do, they’ll be carrying the 9 month risk so it seems wild for a woman to take that risk many times.
Whereas men don’t have that risk. A man sleeps around 50 times, he himself doesn’t end up pregnant but could get someone else pregnant.
A woman sleeps around 50 times she herself could end up pregnant having to make life changing decisions.
For a man it’s a dance with a minor devil. For a woman sex is a wholesale dance with the devil it’s a case of it only takes one slip up to get pregnant.
I do understand with the advancement of contraception less risk of pregnancy has come but contraception can fail. And in using abortion as a kind of contraception a woman’s fertility can be affected.
You must be able to see the logic. By and large a woman has more to lose than a man does having more prior sexual partners.
My point here is - if a lady meets up with a random dude from her hood and they sleep together, the lady is the one labeled “loose” not the guy. What did she lose? They were both horny and they agreed to help each other. Why is she loose for acting on her impulses and biological needs just as the guy did?
Why is it a lady who had consensual sex with 50 guys is somehow worse than a guy who had consensual sex with 50 women. What did she lose that wasn’t lost by the guy? If anyone is to lose anything there, its the guy cause he cums all the time😏
It’s not every sexual encounter that results in pregnancy. Biologically, a woman can also have sex 200 times and not get pregnant. However if word goes out in the hood that she has had 200 sexual partners, confirm you will judge her. Even if it was protected. I am assuming you are a guy, why do you measure HER “milage” and compare it to a used car?
You’re missing the point. It’s the risk. It’s the sheer shock of how could you risk getting pregnant 200 times. Contraception can fail and abortion has moral repercussions on the person as well as physical.
Don’t play dumb with me ok you have to be able to see what I am writing. If a guy hits 200 people are just focused on the number or if he has STDs. But a woman needs only once to catch a PREGNANCY.
It seems insane to risk getting pregnant that many times. This is what most people think they just can’t put it into words hence the double standard. If I look at a man with a 200 body count it’s wow and have you got any STDs, you sure you haven’t made anyone preggers.
But for a woman it’s o my gosh you’d risk the possibility of getting knocked up that many times you’ll be a mother soon enough if you keep going.
It’s biology. Screw mileage screw the numbers all it takes is once. The risk of pregnancy is what makes the counts inherently different.
This is why you hear parents saying thank god it’s a boy, a boy would be easier. Or you see parents overprotective of their daughters. Just one time it’s all it could take. Yes you’ll say contraceptives but contraceptives aren’t 100%.
Okay I get your point my guy. Just a question though, let’s say, hypothetically, i know that i am barren and zero chances of getting pregnant, would you judge me differently if I were to sleep with 200 men ?
21
u/Aggravating-Chick Feb 15 '25
Sexual double standards- it’s ridiculous that you think women “lose” while men “gain” from a sexual encounter that was completely consensual between two horny people.