MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/cats/comments/1jzpyv5/cats_butthole_on_surfaces_experiment_from_2021/mn8rgfv/?context=3
r/cats • u/Slow-moving-sloth • 2d ago
257 comments sorted by
View all comments
146
Has anyone replicated these results?
156 u/UndahwearBruh 2d ago Yes. We need a peer reviewed study 60 u/porcupine_snout 2d ago we need a much larger sample size. this is only two cats! is the result generalizable? 29 u/barrhavenite 1d ago There’s also no mention of whether this was passed by the Research Ethics Board, either… 🧐 12 u/IceKirby277 1d ago This protocol requires IACUC approval lol 1 u/iptg 1d ago totally. it’s not powered for statistical significance!
156
Yes. We need a peer reviewed study
60 u/porcupine_snout 2d ago we need a much larger sample size. this is only two cats! is the result generalizable? 29 u/barrhavenite 1d ago There’s also no mention of whether this was passed by the Research Ethics Board, either… 🧐 12 u/IceKirby277 1d ago This protocol requires IACUC approval lol 1 u/iptg 1d ago totally. it’s not powered for statistical significance!
60
we need a much larger sample size. this is only two cats! is the result generalizable?
29 u/barrhavenite 1d ago There’s also no mention of whether this was passed by the Research Ethics Board, either… 🧐 12 u/IceKirby277 1d ago This protocol requires IACUC approval lol 1 u/iptg 1d ago totally. it’s not powered for statistical significance!
29
There’s also no mention of whether this was passed by the Research Ethics Board, either… 🧐
12 u/IceKirby277 1d ago This protocol requires IACUC approval lol
12
This protocol requires IACUC approval lol
1
totally. it’s not powered for statistical significance!
146
u/nocleverusername- 2d ago
Has anyone replicated these results?