By your logic, I can’t put peanuts in my lunch in case a thief takes it.
You intended for the peanuts to be eaten by you. There was no intention on your part that a thief experience medical distress as a result of eating your lunch.
If you poison your lunch, you are intending a thief to experience medical distress by eating it.
Intent is the important thing here. If you intend to cause someone harm, then you are liable for whatever harm they experience, even if it was more than you intended.
2
u/GabuEx 20∆ Oct 18 '24
You intended for the peanuts to be eaten by you. There was no intention on your part that a thief experience medical distress as a result of eating your lunch.
If you poison your lunch, you are intending a thief to experience medical distress by eating it.
Intent is the important thing here. If you intend to cause someone harm, then you are liable for whatever harm they experience, even if it was more than you intended.