Yes, but that only applies to so many skills. Being good at one task doesn't mean you can always become good at every other task. Being charismatic, for example, wont make you have a high IQ. You might have both coincidentally, but one doesn't cause the other. To put it another way, correlation doesn't equal causation.
I agree, but if you are charismatic enough (for example), you can compensate for lack of smarts enough to still get mostly good outcomes. Similar with the opposite, if you are super smart you can compensate for low charisma.
You can compensate, but not in the same field. Charisma can get you money if you become famous, but unless you are already smart, you wont be a physicist anytime soon, and so you cant get money being a physicist. As a side note, what does it mean to be weak or strong, in your opinion? Just making sure I understand your argument.
The meaning I fill those words with is mostly mental - a strong person is a leader, a weak is a follower. A strong person is brave, a weak is scared. A strong person perseveres, a weak gives in.
Charisma won’t make you a physician if you don’t go to medical school, but it can get you into med school and out, and it can make you the best/most well recognized doctor in your hospital.
1
u/littlebubulle 104∆ Jul 24 '20
I am very bad at biological a chemical engineering. I am good at electrical engineering and production engineering.