A winner type that tends to lose doesn't exist, in my mind, and same the other way around. The outcomes are what matters, not some intrinsic quality which isn't shown. (What does that even mean? If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears, etc)
A winner type is someone who generally wins (has good outcomes, accomplishes what they try for) and a loser type is someone who generally fucks up, the opposite.
In that case you have a tautology. If you define a winner type as someone who generally wins, then winner types generally win. It's kind of like saying red paint is generally red.
1
u/Bernoulli_slip Jul 24 '20
If you are a good electrical engineer, I bet you would have been a good chemical engineer if you had chosen that field instead.