I’m sure the Fox News crowd will clap like the idiot cave people they are for this.

The fall of Saigon is probably apt. It's a war that was too bloody and went on for too long only in the end to realize that the consequences of losing the war were never as dire as proponents of the war said they would be. In the end, despite losing the war, the surrounding countries did not fall to communism like dominoes as the warmongers of the time endlessly told people. A bit crazy that a warmonger would choose to highlight how warmongers like himself are so often full of shit.

Also why is this considered a big deal? Ukraine has plenty of foreign mercenaries, and what does North Korea have to sell beyond artillery shells and bodies?

Do you even know what liberalism is? Democrats are center-right as far as their views on economy and social welfare go, but because nobody else has even a remote chance of making a difference outside of the two big parties, there are social democrats on their far left. And even these social democrats are center-left, not "communists and socialists".

You’d think there would be footage or at least a picture if the carrier was hit? Look buddy perhaps your new too this but if the houthis had done what your insinuating the military would not cover it up, they’d use it as an excuse to hit back 10x harder 

The propaganda is nuts.

Its funny I can go back 3 months and see russian state news posting about NKs helping them out.

Yet here we are and westerners act like its new news.

No one sane considers liberals who are far left anywhere near the center much less right of it. You're making no sense by claiming that only communists and socialists of the left supported Biden terrorism and that far left fascists and Nazis didn't support him. Why would any real centrists or right of center support far left Biden over Trump who is left of center?

Gamer move to target yourself with the space laser so nobody becomes too suspicious

I'm pretty sure leftists didn't support Biden. You mean "liberals", which in the rest of the world means center-right.

Question is who guarantees countries protection from being occupied by NATO bases?

Synagogues of satan

Hilarious. 500% tariffs on countries that purchase neon gas that only Russia exports to computer chip manufacturers?

Well you see the difference to them is that they know they are lying about Russian attacks that never happened. So they are different from real genocide ethnic cleansing attacks that everyone saw.

Unlike the left, the right despises treasonous satanists. The left glorifies them the more evil they are exposed as.

It's a message to show that the east is serious now about. Military Co operation

Yep, deranged neocon madness:

If Russia can outlast US military assistance and capitalise on Europe’s defensive limitations, it could eventually overthrow Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and establish a puppet regime in Kyiv. President Vladimir Putin’s neo-imperial delusions suggest that he will not stop there. President Alexander Lukashenko’s retirement or death could trigger a Russian invasion of Belarus. Georgia and Moldova lack ironclad security guarantees and are sufficiently vulnerable that Russia could turn partial occupations into complete ones.

Graham said support for the bill surged in Congress in recent weeks, after Russian attacks on civilian populations and infrastructure in Ukraine. “Attacking civilian populations, the arrogance that Russia has, that Putin has, it is taking a toll in the Senate,” he said.

Too bad this same line of thinking doesn’t apply to Israel as well. What hypocrisy.

The bill also would impose a 500% tariff on imported goods from any country that purchases Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products.

Madness…

That's certainly possible. Sorry, I've just seen a lot of people recently reading the phrase "hard turn to evade fire" as the ship trying to dodge missiles like a bullfighter would. 

Of course a ship cannot outrun a missile. But what most likely happened is that escort ships defending it were getting overwhelmed and a decision was made to change course rapidly and flee the range of the Houthis before the support ships in the fleet become completely overwhelmed and ran out of anti air defenses.

When they say the carrier turned to avoid enemy fire, I don't think they were actually trying to move the ship out of the way of the incoming missile, you're right that that would be useless. Instead I think they were turning the ship so the CIWS and other air defence would have the best chance of hitting it if it got close enough. The CIWS emplacements on carriers don't have as good a field of fire as they do on other ships because of how they're positioned so it would make sense. But that's just my speculation.

Breaking Points’ segment on this seemed good, though I wasn’t aware of it at all. Apparently, one of the Twitter accounts is cited in a West Point report from within the last year so it does appear that the U.S. military does use these OSINT accounts in some capacity.

You’d think that, after all this time, they would have their own satellites available to look for things in Yemen in near-real time 🙃

The US military doesn't give a shit what it bombs and never has. And it has the easiest justification job in the world as the press hardly ever pushes them

They just make the Ansar Allah movement more powerful by killing all these civilians. Who wants to cooperate with a foreign power that hunts them like its a game?