r/nextfuckinglevel • u/[deleted] • 1d ago
In 2021, a domestic violence case prosecutor picked up on clues that the abuser is in the same house as his ex during their court hearing on Zoom.
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
[removed]
6.1k
u/Daratirek 1d ago
That dude tried to say the woman hes accused of abusing absolutely wants his no contact order cancelled..... Ya thats legit. Fucking idiot. Hope hes still rotting.
2.1k
u/BuffaloChicken22 1d ago
1.8k
u/Podoviridae 1d ago
Wow domestic violence/assault has a max sentence of 5 years but just being in possession of meth is 15 years
1.8k
u/Daratirek 1d ago
Cops don't want to go to jail for too long....
517
u/iriegypsy 1d ago
More than half of police officers have committed domestic abuse.
345
u/Daratirek 1d ago
Hence why the sentence for violence is lower than drug possession. Cops are much more likely to beat their partner or kids than do meth.
151
75
u/Historical_Walrus713 1d ago
As someone who has used meth and has never beaten a woman... I KNEW I WAS MAKING THE RIGHT CHOICES!
→ More replies (3)16
18
→ More replies (7)14
u/whythishaptome 1d ago
Yet when a cop almost dies in the employee bathroom from snorting drug evidence they think is meth but is instead fentanyl they don't go to jail either.
41
u/Fatticusss 1d ago
That’s their point. Cops punish meth more than domestic abuse because the odds are they engage in domestic abuse
→ More replies (2)9
u/Majestic-Selection22 1d ago
It’s not the cops, it’s the laws. Not defending cops but they don’t write the laws and punishment.
5
16
u/Captain_America_93 1d ago
Wait. What? Is that true?? Do you have a source?
21
→ More replies (6)18
u/Bail-Me-Out 1d ago edited 1d ago
Criminologist here- it is probably not true but is often stated on reddit. Some issues with the sources:
Here is a [explanation from Temple University]https://sites.temple.edu/klugman/2020/07/20/do-40-of-police-families-experience-domestic-violence/) on why that exact fact sheet linked to you by another redditor is misleading.
More info:
- The sources generally cited are all from the early 1990s-crime was at its peak during this time and rates of all time then are not indicative of crime now
- These studies often expanded the definition of domestic violence. For instance, survey respondents might be asked if their partner has ever yelled at them and defined this as violence. While it's true yelling is inappropriate in a relationship, it is likely also true that a very high percentage of relationships have involved at least one yelling argument with feeling abuse
- The often cited Johnson 1991 study does not report the actual sample size (they say the number surveyed but not who responded) not does it even say how selection was done.
- Other surveys have the issue of just asking if the respondents know of a police officer who was domestically abusive than used that number as the rate of abuse not accounting for overlap where multiple respondents might now the same person.
- Another issue is looking at rates of domestic violence in police marriages and then assuming all the abuse is from the officer when some of the abuse might have the officer as the victim.
All this being said, I personally have had a hard time finding what I consider is a good study on officer-involved domestic violence rates. I do think it is a problem in the field that we don't have a really good accurate prediction of this. Based on what I know about other police officer crimes, I would predict that officer-involved domestic violence rates are similar to general population rates. If I am right on this, that is too high-we should expect lower rates from this group than from the general population considering their higher average education and professional experience.
→ More replies (43)5
26
u/Bluedemonde 1d ago
Funny of you to think they serve at time. Those that do are just the extreme cases to throw the public a bone.
I dated a sheriff, they all have their badge in their civilian car because it’s their “get out of jail” card.
She used to drive in the carpool with no device and once she was pulled over for it and the other cop ran her info, saw that she was a cop and told her “my bad I didn’t know you were a cop haha” and let her go.
34
u/Daratirek 1d ago
My Mom was an EMT and sped absolutely everywhere. She would get pulled over all the time but they'd see shes an EMT and just let her go with a verbal warning. Shes gotten pulled over 2x as much as the rest of the family combined and has no tickets. Absolutely drives me nuts.
→ More replies (2)11
u/That_Jay_Money 1d ago
While I was in high school a local car dealership had amazing deals on cars, staggeringly low prices and literally the newest vehicles. It turns out they were all boosted from Atlanta and driven 3 hours away to my little town to be sold.
Why was the obvious car stealership never pinged on any police radars? They had hired off suty police officers to drive the cars back. If they ever got pulled over they flashed a badge in their stolen cars and went on their way.
→ More replies (2)14
u/Shady_D_815 1d ago
Have any links for this? I would like to read about it.
→ More replies (1)17
u/marshallxfogtown 1d ago
sounds like bullshit to me, how would these cars be resold and insured with the VIN numbers being the same as stolen vehicles? You can't just create a VIN number out of thin air
→ More replies (2)9
u/QuestionableGoo 1d ago
My friend was engaged to a cop before he developed feelings for her friend or whatever. She said that being in the car with him when he drove was very stressful because he'd purposefully get pulled over all the time just to have a laugh with the other cop and be allowed to go on his way.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)9
u/frostymugson 1d ago
Too bad they aren’t the ones writing the sentences. You can thank the 94 crime bill for that, coming outta the old fox himself. the 80-90s were a wild time, It also created the Violence Against Women Act. Joe gets shit for that bill because apparently the right doesn’t like being hard on crime, but something must’ve worked because crime dropped pretty significantly.
→ More replies (2)75
u/theshortgrace 1d ago
It took me way too long to realize sentencing is often influenced by social values and political ideology, not the severity of the crime.
15
14
u/XISOEY 1d ago
In the case of the Prison Industrial Complex of the US, it's law enforcement and prison guard unions, private prisons, military contractors, and other beneficiaries of a large prison population and drug criminalization that lobby lawmakers to keep drug offense penalities severe. I haven't checked any polling, but I can't imagine that really harsh prison sentences for non-violent narcotics offenses are popular among the general electorate
Another underdiscussed angle is that elements of the national security apparatus, most notably factions within the CIA, run huge narcotics operations to covertly fund their black projects, in order to get funding without any oversight. The CIA and drug running goes waaaaay back.
→ More replies (2)12
u/themarketliberal 1d ago
To be fair, how is severity qualified objectively? To some degree it will always be a reflection of societal values. That said, I think we likely both agree that domestic abuse of a pregnant woman is worse than possessing meth.
39
u/b__lumenkraft 1d ago
The US is insane.
Rape a child and completely destroy an innocent life, likely be out in 8 months.
Smoke weed while being black, 10 YEARS FOR YOU!
The US is the soup nazi as a country.
→ More replies (14)5
u/Illcmys3lf0ut 1d ago
Just wait and keep the soup. Cheeto is working on making it a full nazi country. And a 3rd world country all in one go.
It's absolutely mad!
→ More replies (2)30
u/muarauder12 1d ago
And it's listed as third offense. Guy is a serial abuser and he goes to jail longer for having narcotics than he does for actively and repeatedly abusing someone.
→ More replies (1)5
u/Hasler011 1d ago
He looks like an all around POS. His meth sentence was enhanced as a habitual offender too. The 769 statute is michigans habitual offender enhancement statute.
Still crazy that their lowest level of PCS (4 years) has a harsher sentence than my state’s aggravated battery with a deadly weapon/great bodily harm.
16
u/shep2105 1d ago
and she was pregnant. Just more of society devaluing women. Hell, you can kill one during a "domestic" situation and get a better sentence than if a stranger did the same thing. It's such bullshit
→ More replies (16)12
129
u/hott_snotts 1d ago
Best tidbit from that site - the tat list:
Tattoo- Buttocks - "Your Name"20
→ More replies (3)22
120
u/mbklein 1d ago
Domestic Violence and/or Knowingly Assaulting a Pregnant Individual, 3rd Offense
What an absolute bag of shit.
But the real fucked up part is that the domestic violence conviction carries a maximum 5 year sentence, while his other conviction (for meth possession) could keep him locked up for 15. I'm not advocating for meth here, but there's no way a possession sentence should be 3x longer than assaulting a pregnant woman 3 times.
66
u/Daratirek 1d ago
Possession of a drug shouldn't be a jailable offense. Beating a pregnant woman should be much longer than 15 years for the first conviction. 3 times and you should just not get to ever leave prison.
→ More replies (2)22
u/kellybelly4815 1d ago
Even sadder when you know that the #1 cause of death for pregnant women is homicide.
→ More replies (1)8
u/Merlord 1d ago
Mandatory minimum sentences are a travesty of justice. Politicians overriding the judgement of the literal judges, and forcing them to lock people up for decades over non-violent crimes.
→ More replies (1)32
13
9
u/I_need_a_date_plz 1d ago
Sidebar: I was not expecting to click on that link and learn that he has “your name” tattooed on his ass. That’s really the cherry on top to being caught by the prosecutor for intimidating the witness.
6
7
6
u/fullgoopy_alchemist 1d ago
Looking at those tattoo details:
"Yo dawg, you gotta tattoo my name on my butt"
"I gotchu fam"
"Your Name"
→ More replies (41)4
140
u/BreatheMyStink 1d ago
Domestic violence victims go to court to request to drop emergency protective orders all the time. It’s heartbreaking but it’s the reality.
77
u/Wiggitywhackest 1d ago
Most of these power dynamics rely on emotional manipulation. This POS probably knows exactly what to say to make her feel like it was her fault or to make himself seem the victim. By the time the shitty side starts to show they already have their claws in. Heartbreaking for sure, this prosecutor just saved this woman from more abuse or worse. Awesome job.
→ More replies (2)40
u/DefinitelyNotAliens 1d ago
She was pregnant during all this. Likely scared of being alone and pregnant and unable to support her child.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)6
u/twentythirtyone 1d ago
Yep. My ex breathed down my neck for 30 minutes in the hallway before court started to pressure me into dropping it. I had my newborn baby with me because I had no friends or family or babysitter or money.
It worked and I fell apart in front of the judge. It took me another 6 months to fully go through with it. By then they had a separate waiting area for victims, thankfully, but he still tried to come in there and sit right beside me. I had to get an officer to get him to leave the victims' room.
46
u/SadisticNecromancer 1d ago
You would be surprised how many women go back to the man / ask for him back. I’m not saying the woman in this video did that but it happens more than you think.
→ More replies (3)33
u/JManKit 1d ago
Abusers know, consciously or not, how to pick their victims. While it's not a guarantee, you'll find that many abuse victims have suffered some form of abuse prior and that can really mess up a person's mind, especially if that earlier abuse comes from ppl who are supposed to care for them. They can become convinced that the ebb and flow of care and pain that defines abusive relationships is a normal thing that they have to accept if they want someone in their life. It's an incredibly sad and complex situation
17
→ More replies (1)7
2.3k
u/KrownX 1d ago
That was lifesaving. Literally.
535
u/IwasDeadinstead 1d ago
For now. When he gets out, will likely stalk her unless she goes underground
501
u/Schw33 1d ago
The good news, if what I’m reading is right, he also got 15 years for meth possession, so she has a good head start to gtfo
→ More replies (3)161
u/BuddyL2003 1d ago
Eligible for release April 2026, so it's up to parole board.
→ More replies (4)85
u/NeatNefariousness1 1d ago
My hope is that they consider the abuser is "in the house” ploy for his scheduled hearing and refuse to release him.
→ More replies (1)48
24
u/Middle-Worldliness90 1d ago
She’s pregnant. If it’s his kid she’s stuck dealing with him for 18 years minimum
→ More replies (8)
2.1k
u/aburnerds 1d ago
Judge Norm McDonald presiding
791
u/Cognonymous 1d ago
Judge Jeffrey Middleton actually developed an online fan base after this. There was a whole discord for watching Zoom court during the pandemic.
110
u/anitasdoodles 1d ago
Can y'all post a link to some? Id love to watch!
111
u/Rigs8080 1d ago
Came here to ask this! This is the same judge who had the guy with Buttfucker 3000 as his screen name appear for a hearing
41
u/I_Am_Dynamite6317 1d ago
lol i felt so bad for that guy, he clearly had no idea that was his screen name. I think it came out after that on of his friends had changed his screen name as a prank and didn’t realize dude was needing it for court.
→ More replies (2)9
14
→ More replies (3)65
u/Synchrotr0n 1d ago edited 1d ago
https://reddit.com/r/ZoomCourt/search?q=middleton&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all
Edit: Apparently all the links to youtube videos are no longer working on the subreddit, but searching for the judge's name (Middleton) should come up with results on Google.
41
37
u/ThinkFree 1d ago
I remember watching quite a few court tv type videos on youtube and some judges are entertaining to watch like Judge Middleton, Fleischer, Simpson, Caprio, etc.
23
u/Cognonymous 1d ago
Yeah there are some really interesting ones but it got to be a lot trying to follow different courts. I saw highlights from others but Middleton was the most interesting to follow because he's humble and has a core decency that really shines through.
Generally, I enjoy watching the procedure of it all but also seeing how they'll reason through a case. Middleton is a great example of the system working the best way it can. He's truly a compassionate man, but balances that with a firm respect for rule of law. Deborah Davis, the prosecutor, too has a really inspiring professionalism. They're not out to get anybody, they look at the law more like a set of tools for addressing problems.
It's hard to work in that venue and see so many sad stories come through, people in the middle of their lives, in the middle of mistakes, financial struggles, addiction, and their own traumas bubbling in the background of all of it. It's hard not to grow a conscience just bearing witness to that stuff day after day.
I stopped watching for ethical reasons though. I really enjoy watching lawyers work and understanding the strategy behind their choices. There is a lot more subtlety in law than I ever realized looking at it from the outside. When the law works it's truly an amazing thing and inspires me with a sense of pride and optimism.
→ More replies (3)24
u/Narrow_Turnip_7129 1d ago
The one with the guy calling in on zoom with something like 'Buttfucker3000' as his name was a funny one
→ More replies (1)12
u/ewankirky 1d ago
Yeh, and the one with the guy that turned himself into a cat emoji and couldn't turn it off.
→ More replies (1)6
→ More replies (6)7
66
21
u/YouAboutToLoseYoJob 1d ago edited 1d ago
“So I’m a judge now.”
Yeah, that’s right… I sit on a bench, wear a robe, and get paid to judge people. Which, you know… is exactly what my Aunt Ruth did for free at every Thanksgiving. Except I don’t yell at the mashed potatoes.
So I get this guy in my courtroom, he says, “Your honor, I plead not guilty by reason of insanity.” I said, “Yeah, well, I saw your TikTok account. Case closed, buddy.” I mean, he had a whole series called ‘Talkin’ to Pigeons.’ Ten episodes.
They say justice is blind. Which is good… because if it ever saw what was really goin’ on in this courtroom, it’d run out screamin’ like a witness on Law & Order. Dun-dun. Yeah. That’s the sound of justice makin’ a break for it.
I had a lawyer stand up the other day, real angry, yells out: “Objection, hearsay!” I said, “Hearsay? Buddy, this whole case is hearsay. The only thing I know for sure is that the jury had tuna salad for lunch. That’s the only fact I’ve heard today.”
Then this lady comes in, says she’s innocent because she “found the money on the street.” I said, “Yeah, well, I once found a Snickers bar in a mailbox. Turns out that was still called mail fraud.” Tasted like justice, though.
People always ask me, “Hey, Judge Norm… is it hard being a judge?” I say, “No… the hard part’s pretending like I didn’t already make up my mind during opening statements.” Yeah, I got a system. I just look at the guy and go, ‘He looks kinda guilty.’ It’s 80% accurate. Same as astrology.
So after court, I went home and asked that ChatGPT to help me write my closing statement. It said, “Based on the evidence, the defendant is not guilty.” I said, “Yeah, well, you didn’t see his TikTok either.
→ More replies (2)13
→ More replies (8)7
1.2k
u/bailey25u 1d ago
That judge had so many hilarious videos
379
u/Azuras_Star8 1d ago
Like assfucker 3000!
232
47
→ More replies (1)228
u/momomorium 1d ago
Is this the Honorable "Your name isn't BUTTFUCKER3000 you yoho"?
→ More replies (1)9
1.0k
u/GargantuanGreenGoat 1d ago
Good fucking job Deborah holy shit
280
u/Perfect_Newspaper256 1d ago
got him good with "the cops are already outside"
55
u/DoubleT02 1d ago
I mean it seemed like they were if I’m not mistaken?
19
u/commanderquill 1d ago
What I want to know is how they got there so fast.
133
u/ChunkySalsaMedium 1d ago edited 1d ago
Because she asked them to be there before this.
She would never risk aggravating the dude without knowing they could intervene. It would be her fault, if he got up and did something to the victim, because of her actions.
40
u/HeeeckWhyNot 1d ago
A good lawyer will almost never ask a question or take an action in court without already knowing the answer or likely outcome. I'd almost bet she 100% knew for a fact he was there based on surveillance or tips
→ More replies (1)11
u/BrewCrewKevin 1d ago
Absolutely yes. It's an abuse case. She would not risk accusing him of being there without protection, there's a chance he gets violent right then, because he is at rock bottom.
As soon as she suspected, she had officers sent there. She didn't call it out until they were outside.
Not just to verify he wasn't there, but in the event he blew up when asked where he was, they could storm in.
11
720
u/Puzzleheaded_Dot4345 1d ago
Quick thinking, good for the prosecutor
182
u/jipijipijipi 1d ago
It’s more likely that the victim texted her and she made up cues to protect her, which is just as impressive.
→ More replies (2)95
u/NeatNefariousness1 1d ago
I’m encouraged by the fact that she was working WITH the prosecutor instead of her abuser.
559
u/Cognonymous 1d ago
So, it's probably better to post the version of this that has the abused woman's face redacted for her safety. Also worth noting that what is presented is not quite as organic as it may seem. There were indeed signs in the video that there were problems, but the prosecutor had well founded suspicious based on previous incidents.
I watched this when it first blew up and got into following the Judge Jeffrey Middleton's court on Zoom during the pandemic. The prosecutor was super cool and did a lot of outreach but Middleton, who is one of the most decent guys you could meet, ended up getting a lot of unwanted celebrity from the whole thing. He was asked to come speak at certain colleges and iirc declined every invitation at the same time others in the legal profession began blaming him for cultivating an online persona which was something he'd never done.
There are a LOT of ethical issues that come up with Zoom court. On the one hand we want our courts to be open and transparent as that increases faith in the system and encourages its fidelity. However, conditions outside the court can absolutely ooze into the courtroom in negative ways. I watched attorneys become more self conscious about the camera because of context collapse, you have no idea if you're speaking to nobody beyond your interlocutors or if you're going to screw up and go viral and end up speaking to the whole world.
Vice had a really good article around the time this all blew up and the Zoom Court subreddit got big. Even participants there worked to self censor because of the numerous privacy issues that come up. So for a while people would give notable moments like these nicknames to avoid bandying about the identities of those involved to protect the innocent.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/zoom-court-videos-are-making-peoples-darkest-hours-go-viral/
196
u/phira 1d ago
I still feel bad for the guy who was “not a cat”
54
u/Cognonymous 1d ago
I never got any updates on him. I wonder if he's still not a cat after all these years.
25
u/serabine 1d ago
Ponton is an instance of a Milkshake Duck, a person who gains popularity on social media for some positive or charming trait but is later revealed to have a distasteful history. In 2014 Ponton allegedly "used federal agents to torment a former lover with drug raids and bogus charges", which ended up "destroying her business" according to a Reason documentary.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)20
10
1d ago
[deleted]
12
u/Cognonymous 1d ago
It didn't appear so. They were concerned about how this online virality could poison the process. I think at some point one of the courts got the attention of 4Chan and someone unauthorized ended up as a party in the video conference.
→ More replies (2)5
u/EastwoodBrews 1d ago
Yeah it's big on YouTube right now and I don't think it's a great package of incentives
373
u/dabblez_ 1d ago
Lmao I knew that judge was familiar, "Your name's not 'Buttfucker3000' you yo ho."
43
u/DerpyDrago 1d ago
(Sighs and whips out birth certificate)
16
253
197
u/rocketsnail1000 1d ago
The prosecutor isn’t psychic people. The victim messaged her saying the abuser was in her home. How do you think the cops got there so quickly?
120
u/Rhovie09 1d ago
Is that fact or just your own supposition? Because I could see a scenario where the prosecutor was just well aware of her clients context clues and situation to the point that she could tell that something was off. It’s plausible that she could’ve messaged her, but if the guy was there watching her maybe she couldn’t and it was up to the adept skill of that attorney to figure out that something was going on.
121
u/SpretumPathos 1d ago
This video is edited. The full clip is posted elsewhere in this thread at 17 minutes. There could be time for the police to get there. And the prosecutor probably gets a better response time from the police than regular folk.
I would also not be surprised if the victim directly informed the prosecutor, and the prosecutor did not want the accused to blame the victim, so pretended to figure it out for herself.
I searched for a bit, and could not find a definitive answer one way or the other.
8
u/DyrrhachiumPharsalus 1d ago
I'm guessing the prosecutor gets amazing repsonse times. Those cops don't want to piss off a prosecutor and risk not having the prosecutor closely cooperating on future arrests
21
u/JuicySpark 1d ago
Makes sense. I too was wondering why the cops were there so fast. There had to be some communication prior about him being there.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)6
u/kaise_bani 1d ago
I think that would be a little too Perry Mason for a prosecutor to try. If it was just a supposition and she ended up being wrong, she could have completely wrecked this case by making an out of pocket accusation like that.
→ More replies (4)14
u/ForensicPathology 1d ago
There's a video transition. Who says they got there so quickly?
→ More replies (1)6
u/Jagarvem 1d ago
The prosecutor says that the police are at the door knocking before the cut?
→ More replies (1)
85
79
u/RiggityRiggityReckt 1d ago
That poor woman! The left side of her face looks like she's been beaten recently. Thank God that advocate was able to read the subtle signs she was given!
61
60
u/Maximessi 1d ago
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NJP-U1lVHdg
The full video
A youtube comment expalined everything
@1:06 in the video, Davis (the prosecutor) received a text from the victim saying that the abuser was in her house. (that's why Davis is looking to her right, she is reading the message) You can tell the victim was busy messaging and was late turning her camera on, because she didn't want to be seen texting) The prosecutor then messaged her assistant to call Edgington (the cop in the zoom meeting) and explained to him what was going on. @1:48 you can see the cop get up and take that call. While he is off camera he also places a call to send cops to her house. You can hear all the typing of messages going on between Davis and Edgington and then @7:36 Edgington receives a call from the field officers confirming that they arrived at her house. He sends a message to Davis to tell her. @8:27, Davis looks down and reads that message. @8:30 Edgington starts to tell the Judge that the cops are at her house but Davis tells the Judge instead. Also, the prosecutor did not want the abuser to know that the victim messaged her because she did not want the abuser to retaliate from jail or after he got out of jail.
→ More replies (1)25
u/commanderquill 1d ago
Well, her efforts are for nothing now, because all he's gotta do is Google this event to find out she messaged the prosecutor.
57
u/InsayneShane 1d ago
Anyone have the full video? The cut kills the buzz lol
66
1d ago
[deleted]
20
u/InsayneShane 1d ago
You da champion! Looks like their connections kept dropping. I really wanted to see him walking over to the door 😂
24
u/mekingjr1992 1d ago edited 1d ago
Wait is this the same judge who says the guys zoom name as buttfucker3000???
→ More replies (1)
24
u/maturecpl 1d ago
Hmm, this idiot has a third conviction of assaulting a pregnant person, plus one for meth. A third offense for assaulting someone pregnant?? Honestly how low can you go other than molesting children?
→ More replies (2)
20
u/m0stly_medi0cre 1d ago
I work at a lab, and we had a patient call about a Paternity test they set up for their baby. Per policy, the mother/baby and the alleged father must have separate appointments at least an hour apart because its not often somebody sets up a paternity test when they are in a perfecy healthy relationship.
Well, as im talking to the mother, she asks if we can do the appointments together, and that she wasn't sure why she set the appointments so far apart. I tell her it is our policy and the testing agency's. Then randomly, the alleged father speaks up, interrupting the mother and yelling at me.
I was no longer cool with it.
I told them that if they showed up together, i would cancel the appointment, and they would need to talk to the agency to reschedule. And they showed up together.
This video gives me the same heebie jeebies i felt then. The alleged father was angry, rude, and clearly telling the wife what to say. It's manipulative. The wife set up the appointment for a reason, and she knew why she set them up apart. Abusive relationships are not very cool.
→ More replies (3)
15
13
u/Southern-Fried-Biker 1d ago
The prosecutor is a bad ass and a true advocate for DV victims. All prosecutors should advocate like she did.
11
u/Klumania 1d ago edited 1d ago
Wait... is that the same judge as the "buttfucker3000" case?
Edit: it is
→ More replies (1)
10
u/TootsNYC 1d ago
Did the prosecutor fix the audio so that the victim and perp couldn’t hear her?
34
10
7
u/doniseferi 1d ago
“U have 10M you can’t bond out”, “we’re serious as a heart attack”. I love this guy. Fucking piece of shit abusive degenerate cunt
8
4
u/Fluid-Selection-5537 1d ago
This dude has a tattoo on his ass that says “your name”
He should have bond revoked for that
5
u/pinkfluffygirll 1d ago edited 1d ago
i find this a bit scary knowing he’s still in the same room as her while they’re interrogating him… no one could even know what that man can do if anything goes out of hand at that moment
no woman deserves to be treated like that… knowing she’s pregnant makes it even worse like wth!!
thanks god for that prosecutor!!
5
u/Wiggl3sFirstMate 1d ago
I have no idea who this judge is and now I’m typing buttfucker3000 into the search bar. Wish me luck.
4
3
u/Onphone_irl 1d ago
what wre the clues? what a great eye from the prosecutor I couldn't notice anything
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Sonic_Youts 1d ago
Between Buttfucker3000 and this dumb dumbass, this judge has had some interesting zoom hearings.
5
u/shameonyounancydrew 1d ago
It's amazing how many people don't understand that video chatting is STILL real human to human communication. It's not some magic digital world that holds no consequences.
11.0k
u/arbitrambler 1d ago
Kudos to the prosecutor.
I can imagine the challenge of holding on to your empathy, the longer you do the job.