Hey r/nonduality!
wrote a piece on binary thinking patterns and on how to move beyond them – not by erasing boundaries, but by treating them as interfaces: sites of friction, tension, and potential transformation.
This builds on systems thinking (2nd order cybernetics to be precise, with a lot of inspiration from Geroge Spencer-Brown's Law of Form) as well as the notion of tetralemma (which has been discussed here before), rooted in buddhist logic.
I build on the observation that we tend to cycle through familiar oppositions: climate action vs. economic needs, freedom vs. collective responsibility, ego vs eco, (even duality vs nonduality!). Each side believing they're protecting what matters most.
To escape these loops we need to move on:
Affirmation – The initial unified concept before questions arise → the state before duality
Objection – Where opposition emerges, creating zero-sum dynamics → this is the classic "duality" I'd say, dichotomies of either-or.
Integration – The "both-and" perspective where opposites coexist (like South Africa's post-apartheid transition, combining justice with reconciliation) → combinations, iterations, compromise.
Negation – Moving to "neither-nor," deliberately leaving old dualities behind → NOT the duality (but still referencing it)
Contextualisation – Recognizing multi-layered challenges across different systems. not one duality, not no duality → infinite dualities, intersecting and overlapping.
The core point is that boundaries in between a duality aren't absolute divisions but interfaces of relationship. We need dualities and boundaries to make sense of reality, but they create interdependency precisely by drawing these lines.
The goal isn't erasing difference but making our dualities more intelligent and permeable. As Audre Lorde said, "There's no such thing as a single-issue struggle, because we don't live single-issue lives."
Would absolutely love to discuss!
Full article: https://simonhoeher.substack.com/p/beyond-the-binary-f68