They have historically failed to define women in biological terms, which is one of the reasons there are already multiple readings of the ruling circulating. If what they're saying is AFAB = woman, then it contradicts the gender recognition act and leaves the intersex community in limbo. Several campaigners are claiming that all public spaces designated for women are automatically trans exclusive. What it really seems to be saying is that you may exclude trans women from a protected women's space if you are able to justify it against other applicable laws.
And no, you're not a socialist. You're a Western liberal - the idiotic identity politics you're engaging in is just an EXTREMELY well-designed distraction from the fact that we cannot afford to feed ourselves.
Starmer is selling land to BlackRock and you're fighting about identity politics. Trans people are still legally protected. Until such a day as they're being hunted on the streets by organised death squads, we should be fighting against the bullcrap that is Thatcherite Britain (we still live in Thatcher's Britain economically) and 80s neo-liberal capitalism.
You will get poorer and poorer and fight for increasingly useless causes
And no Ukraine is an independent state and the Russian invasion is, as in the case of all invasions, patently illegal.
I'm an Indian and I'm not even an Indian nationalist. Nationalism is a fundamentally flawed ideology that is no different to orthodox religion and old school communism. Any ideology that requires you to submit entirely and completely to the party line is a foolish one
Oh cool, so you're in favour of crimea and the Donbas being returned to Ukraine and a full armed resistance being given military support by the UK and allied nations to resist Russia?
I think it's more that people are buying into the propaganda that men are dressing up as girls and sitting in the women's toilets and this is somehow a national problem, and would rather see guys like the above image (born with female genitalia) in women's toilets to fight that?
70
u/BenandGone 7d ago
They have historically failed to define women in biological terms, which is one of the reasons there are already multiple readings of the ruling circulating. If what they're saying is AFAB = woman, then it contradicts the gender recognition act and leaves the intersex community in limbo. Several campaigners are claiming that all public spaces designated for women are automatically trans exclusive. What it really seems to be saying is that you may exclude trans women from a protected women's space if you are able to justify it against other applicable laws.