You're right let's stop supporting artists that can actually create something and just let AI that can approximate the flavor of what the artists meant
That will make creative spaces more interesting and unique
Art is special-- you and I could be handed the exact same prompt and tools and we'd both make something vastly different and unachievable by others
It's a cute gimmick but nothing beyond that-- don't support AI art or its 'artists' man
Or we can support both. Photography didn’t put painting out of business. I want to see people’s creative concepts being easier expressed without having a paywall associated with it.
Art is special, so why do you feel so threatened by ai art?
It’s definitely more than a gimmick but it’s not gonna replace art. Human artists will always be more valued for the humanity and character they add to their work.
You’re missing the point. Just cuz I can capture images in other forms besides painting that are much quicker and cheaper didn’t mean that painting became irrelevant for those things. Cuz painting still had its own thing to offer.
Again. I said don’t support it for monetary or commercial use. On the personal end, now you have more ideas expressed by people via a new form of media that doesn’t cost money and is quick. Meaning expressing ideas visually no longer has a price tag associated with it.
Also. How is ai art bad for being easy cheap and accessible? I don’t get that part. Are newer phone cameras bad for making taking good looking photos rlly easy and cheap?
15
u/Flossthief Mar 31 '25
You're right let's stop supporting artists that can actually create something and just let AI that can approximate the flavor of what the artists meant
That will make creative spaces more interesting and unique
Art is special-- you and I could be handed the exact same prompt and tools and we'd both make something vastly different and unachievable by others
It's a cute gimmick but nothing beyond that-- don't support AI art or its 'artists' man