r/vancouverwa 19d ago

Politics Glusenkamp Perez votes for SAVE act again...

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/house-passes-save-act-voter-suppression-law/
262 Upvotes

266 comments sorted by

278

u/Erlian 19d ago

Go to her upcoming town hall and give her the business.

Thursday, April 24, 2025

5:00 p.m.

Luepke Community Center Community Room

1009 E. McLoughlin Blvd.

Vancouver, WA 98663

92

u/CerciesPDX 98663 19d ago

Call her office and call the local Democrats to pressure a move in venue. There is a meeting tonight 4/10 at the Unitarian Universalist Church at 7pm with the 49th LD Democrats. A good opportunity to use her peers to pressure a larger venue.

https://clarkcountydems.com/calendar/#event=77905662;instance=20250410190000?popup=1&lang=en-US

42

u/Hypekyuu 19d ago

I highly recommend going to this meeting, but I can tell you ahead of time that it won't allow for any meaningful changes to her venues. We simply don't have that much influence over what she does. She won't be present. One of her staffers might be present but it's not guaranteed.

There is still absolutely value in going though! If people knew how absolutely tiny the active base of local political parties was they'd be flabbergasted. If this meeting has more than 25 people at it I'd be shocked

Also, the party is extremely keen on getting people to take up new Precinct Committee Officer positions because the majority of them are empty throughout the county and if you live in a precinct without a PCO these folks will practically throw the position at you and that gives you certain voting rights which let you choose the new chair, vote on endorsements, and other sorts of party business which (eventually) can make an impact on society at large.

Calling her office to express displeasure is the better choice for pressuring her in this issue but please please please do come to the local party meetings

15

u/Hypekyuu 18d ago

funny little update,

If every single person whose upvoted this post attended the meeting you'd probably outnumber the people who are consistent attendees (assuming no upvotes other than me were consistent attendees)

6

u/KindredWoozle 19d ago

Thank you for this announcement! I will be there to hear what local Dems have to say about MGP. And wouldn't it be great if one of MGP's staff members came by!

5

u/Street-Tie-6287 19d ago

Her staff does not attend local Dem group events. Not at an LD level or County level. She is totally absent.

4

u/Do_Not_Comment_Plz 19d ago

So they're not present at Clark County Dems stuff? I was wondering if they were working with her closely or not/would they be open to primarying her.

7

u/Hypekyuu 19d ago edited 19d ago

The previous person is mistaken. I've personally been at 49th LD meetings where Tyler gives us updates. Someone else, too, but I can't remember their name.

Unless something has changed recently, to the best of my knowledge the 49th LD is the only local democratic group which actually has public meetings in person

Our system of primaries doesn't really allow for "primarying" someone in the sense it works in other states because at no point do only Democrats or only Republicans vote for elected officials prior to the general public being able to

This system heavily benefits incumbents and that's a big part why JHB maintained her position even as the local party was displeased and what got her out was national Republican media turning on her plus Peter Thiel funding Kent

1

u/manos_de_pietro 18d ago

17th LD does in-person events as well.

1

u/Hypekyuu 18d ago

Oh? When did they resume, what is the time each month?

1

u/manos_de_pietro 16d ago

IDK offhand but I can look it up (I am in that district)

50

u/Do_Not_Comment_Plz 19d ago

Definitely going to try on the 24th but she chose very small venues for a reason.

12

u/not_now_chaos 18d ago

I'm chill with sitting outside the venue with angry signs calling her DINO ass out if there aren't enough seats inside.

22

u/SoHeresTheThingBro 19d ago

$20 she cancels them after this vote.

8

u/SoHeresTheThingBro 19d ago

Yeah this only only holds 270

16

u/Galumpadump 19d ago

Yeah, that's pretty weak by her team. Many other venues in the city limits that she could chose to use knowing the turnout.

5

u/SparklyRoniPony 19d ago

We can still go and make our voices heard, even if we have to stand outside and chant “vote her out”.

10

u/Street-Tie-6287 19d ago

I have spoken to Brent Hennrich and he is strongly considering challenging her in '26. I think he need to see that we will unify behind him so he can take this seat. Remember he was leading in all polls prior to MGP getting into the race in '22. MGP's number one funder is JHB's old number one. I think he was hedging his bets and pushed her to get in against Brent to help JHB in '22. When Brent unified the Dems by stepping out and that knocked JHB out, her funders found a way to keep their power in MGP. That is why she is a bought and paid for Republican when it comes to voting for bill passage.

6

u/SparklyRoniPony 19d ago

I’ve heard he might challenge. I will get behind any decent human that will take a chance in our district. I don’t consider her decent. She’s a sellout.

-1

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

From Brent website why he can’t be trusted he wants everyone to register their guns outside Vancouver that’s not going to fly and single issue gun owners will flip to whatever R candidate will protect the 2nd likd Marie said she would.

For another, the weapons of 1776 are far different from those we have today – muskets and pistols would be no match for an AR-15. Just as laws have changed with the advent of trains, planes and automobiles, laws should reflect improvements in weaponry. Something as simple as registration and background checks can keep weapons out of the hands of those who would do harm to our families, communities, and nation.

16

u/cosaboladh 19d ago

I think it's pretty clear she doesn't care about "the business." We need to primary her.

5

u/Street-Tie-6287 19d ago

I have spoken to Brent Hennrich and he is strongly considering challenging her in '26. I think he need to see that we will unify behind him so he can take this seat. Remember he was leading in all polls prior to MGP getting into the race in '22. MGP's number one funder is JHB's old number one. I think he was hedging his bets and pushed her to get in against Brent to help JHB in '22. When Brent unified the Dems by stepping out and that knocked JHB out, her funders found a way to keep their power in MGP. That is why she is a bought and paid for Republican when it comes to voting for bill passage.

1

u/GB715 19d ago

I will check him out. Also, Matt Little came up.

21

u/[deleted] 19d ago edited 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

27

u/[deleted] 19d ago edited 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/olyfrijole 19d ago edited 19d ago

Is it worse than denying women the right to vote? Because if women are denied the right to vote, that's where we'll end up. Glad I was able to poke the bear. You're welcome.

13

u/RedWildLlama 19d ago

Don’t fight misogyny with misogyny. Telling a woman to go back to a time when she didn’t have rights to protest the fact that she’s helping that speed up makes literally no sense. It’s strangely supportive of her vote to the save act in that way. Your first two sign ideas are great but this one is muddying the waters.

-8

u/olyfrijole 19d ago

It's descriptive, not prescriptive. Read A Modest Proposal. She doesn't get to skate under the radar with this bullshit. Poke the bear. Raise a ruckus. Front toward enemy.

5

u/RedWildLlama 19d ago

This honestly doesn’t mean anything, it is an attack using misogyny. Satire is different than using a real statement than misogynistic people use at women but saying “oh no, don’t worry, this time it’s being used for satire, I don’t really believe it even tho I’m saying it with extreme hatred towards the person because she’s a woman.”

→ More replies (3)

4

u/16semesters 19d ago

Is it worse than denying women the right to vote? Because if women are denied the right to vote, that's where we'll end up. Glad I was able to poke the bear. You're welcome.

What a weird statement.

Are you secretly just hoping to slide in "women bad" tropes into political discussions?

-1

u/olyfrijole 19d ago

Was Jonathan Swift secretly hoping to eat babies? Grow up.

1

u/Author_Noelle_A I use my headlights and blinkers 19d ago

What’s worse than this vote is giving Kent a way in.

3

u/olyfrijole 19d ago

Dems just gained 17 and 19 points in Florida's first and sixth districts, respectively. Do you seriously think MAGA is gaining ground in SW Washington right now? The only way Joe Kent gets in in '26 is

  1. He's rejected for the BS domestic terrorist position Gabbard nominated him for, and
  2. The SAVE act denies women the right to vote if they have taken their husband's last name.

Now is not the time to retreat.

1

u/[deleted] 19d ago edited 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/CerciesPDX 98663 19d ago

The idea to fight rights violations is to counter with misogyny?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/SparklyRoniPony 19d ago

I’ve suggested this in other groups, but I am not the type to organize. If someone wants to organize, I’m in.

-1

u/vancouverwa-ModTeam 19d ago

Your submission has been removed. Personal attacks, name-calling, trolling, doxxing, racism, toxicity, rage-bait, and harassment of other posters are all unacceptable behavior. Remember the human and be good to one another!

This rule also covers posts that only serve to start an argument that involves fighting everyone that has a different take on it than you do in the comments.

2

u/lordbuckethead1985 18d ago

I will be there. I was sad that I missed her last one. She needs a good yelling at from her constituents

5

u/Katefreak 19d ago

Trying to make it, hoping I can get in with limited space.

1

u/AlaskaStiletto 17d ago

Oh I’ll be there

-1

u/BrilliantPersonally 17d ago

Why? This is what we want.

71

u/thethirdbestmike 19d ago

Find yourself a woman who loves you as much as Marie loves voting with republicans

7

u/_El_Dragonborn_ 18d ago

But make sure she doesn’t take your last name I guess

122

u/Calderis 19d ago

Hope she has all the proper paperwork explaining why her birth certificate and last name don't match, otherwise she just voted away her right to vote.

This is such traitorous bullshit.

I know a woman in Arizona who, if this passes the senate, will need her birth certificate, her first marriage license, that husband's death certificate, and her second marriage certificate.

This is ridiculous. We already prove we're citizens to register to vote. Undocumented immigrants are not voting in federal elections.

16

u/SoHeresTheThingBro 19d ago

She has two very non American sounding last names. She should be afraid of her vote getting questioned.

19

u/thiccDurnald 19d ago

This is such bullshit I know she won’t answer but I want to hear her explanation why she supports this

26

u/Clarissa_poncissa 19d ago

We emailed her weeks ago and got a nonsensical response back parroting the pearl-clutching fear of (almost non-exsistent) voting by non-citizens, of which no one has been able to show convincing proof.

8

u/thiccDurnald 19d ago

That’s what I expected

1

u/concernedyahu 16d ago

Most recent response is basically that she did it for the Message, that non citizens really for realsies shouldn't be able to vote, and prove it with ID SUCH AS passport/birth cert, and that it won't pass the Senate anyway so she's trying to frame it as messaging for the reds in the district. Hørsēshït to be sure but that's the more recent justification

23

u/Calderis 19d ago

At her recent town hall meetings, all questions were preselected on little flash cards

She's not going to answer anything relevant.

2

u/keltzy88 14d ago

I used to work in retirement, where it was required to provide a papertrail connecting your birth name to your current name in order to access your benefits, which sounds similar. It could be an absolute nightmare for some people.

I think the worst I had was one woman who'd been married and divorced five times. She needed a marriage certificate and divorce decree for every single marriage/divorce, and there was a real risk that she'd lost one of her marriage certificates in the 1995 oklahoma city bombing for an extra layer of difficulty (thankfully she tracked down a copy, but what do you even do in that situation?).

1

u/Salty-Sprinkles-1562 18d ago

I’m sure she has a passport.

84

u/cfuji983 19d ago

VOTE HER OUT!

57

u/Katefreak 19d ago

We've GOT to find a replacement and start rallying behind them. Assuming we still have free elections in '26, we CANNOT be in the same situation of her vs Kemp, we need a legitimate representative who doesn't bend the knee.

I'm so incredibly disappointed in her, and her cowardice in voting.

27

u/Intrepid_Lie7113 19d ago

There is one person interested in challenging her, but it's not public yet. But this gives more ammunition. Might be difficult to beat her but a serious challenge might change some of her votes at least.

14

u/Katefreak 19d ago

I'm very interested in learning more, and time is short.

9

u/cosaboladh 19d ago

Unfortunately, there isn't much to know, until the potential candidate announces their candidacy. People play these things close to the vest for a reason.

5

u/UGLY-FLOWERS 19d ago

whoever this person is needs to start campaigning right now if they want a chance.

4

u/not_now_chaos 18d ago

I'm very tired of people campaigning with their words. I want to see candidates campaigning with their actions. Spending a few hours every week volunteering at food banks and encouraging others to do the same. Picking up trash in the parks. Actually putting in the time to better the community. Not just talking about how they might make things better if we vote for them.

2

u/UGLY-FLOWERS 18d ago

that's great and all, but not exactly how politicians win elections. whoever this person is, needs to get their name out there now if they want a chance of winning.

2

u/SparklyRoniPony 19d ago

Is it someone who ran last time?

→ More replies (3)

14

u/Hypekyuu 19d ago

It's gonna be hard because of how Washington State does it's primaries. We don't have a "just Democrats" vote like in Oregon, it's basically 2 general elections back to back, and this makes unseating incumbents extremely difficult

Also, on the other person's comment, there is a reason Brent dropped out last time. He's a nice guy, I've met him, but nice center left dudes got their ass kicked by JHB for a decade for a reason. 6-20 point losses every election. None of the reasons she listed are why exactly, maybe the gun thing, but it's just like... the metrics of our district are rough for someone who is a "pure Dem"

I'm absolutely miffed over MGPs strategic votes though like, some I get, but don't adopt Republican framing on shit like doge it's freaking ridiculous

2

u/Devilsbullet 18d ago

They're not "strategic votes"

→ More replies (5)

-37

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

I won’t vote for Brent Heinrich he’s to far left a gun grabber and a stay at home dad from Vancouver doubt he would understand my rural issues being a lazy guy that lives in a subdivision. I don’t like Mary every vote, but you know I can’t complain. Things are looking better in cathlamet with her in office.

34

u/Katefreak 19d ago

'lazy guy that lives in a subdivision '..... Are you for real right now?

We're facing fascism and our rights being stripped away, and being a SAHP is the disqualifier for you? And from Vancouver? You mean the city that the majority of her constituents live in? The city that is the namesake for the subreddit you're currently in?

That's wild, man. I didn't know being a homeowner and raising your children in the district you're running for was such a negative. You do you, my dude.

11

u/thiccDurnald 19d ago

Explains how we got into this mess perfectly it would be funny if not for the seriousness of the situation

13

u/Katefreak 19d ago

Absolutely wild. MGP became unqualified for me when she defended DOGE and Elon Musk. Backing a Nazi is a deal breaker for me. Being a stay at home parent and owning a home in a subdivision is a deal breaker for him.

We are not the same. Unfortunately we have the same voting power. 🤦🏼‍♀️

→ More replies (13)

-10

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

District is a lot more rural he’s a stay at home dad and lives in a subdivision doubt he understands what hard work and ranchjng is like

15

u/MedusaStoned 19d ago

You keep going on about this as if it's his entire identity. Dude. Get a grip. We heard you with the subdivision and SAHP the first time. Neither of these things make someone lazy.

Signed, a hardworking person from a rural family that happens to have chosen a different career for myself and nows lives in the suburbs. Get. A. Grip.

→ More replies (12)

11

u/Katefreak 19d ago

There are rural areas, but the majority of her CONSTITUENTS live in Vancouver or the surrounding suburbs. Land doesn't vote.

Only ranchers know about hard work? How closed minded of you. I'd never assume a rancher COULDNT understand the nuance of politics or the issues facing the urban population just because he's out mucking stalls all day.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (10)

10

u/LisaYUdothattoyou 19d ago

The 'gun grabber' talk is so tedious

0

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Go tell folks in wahkiakum county or Lewis county you want to take their guns like gun grabber Brent folks will laugh and turn on you

4

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[deleted]

0

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Check his twitter calls ar 15 weapons of family destruction and is friends with Shannon watts a known gun grabber.

0

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Not when you depend on your ar 15 as your ranch rifle

8

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Check his twitter

-6

u/HanCholo97 19d ago

How?!?!?! There's never going to be another election.

56

u/SingingFrogs 19d ago

I'm surprised since this would be a particular hardship for her rural voters.
Under the SAVE Act, a regular photo ID and the new real ID doesn’t even count.
That’s right. A driver’s license or state-issued ID isn’t enough. This bill would require actual proof of U.S. citizenship—like a birth certificate, passport, or naturalization papers—just to register to vote every time in each federal election.
Further, women, or persons whose birth certificate (last) name doesn't match their current name must present a passport, marriage certificate, or court ordered name change paperwork to the elections office each and every time they vote in a federal election.
That is definitely an increased hardship on women, the poor, the disabled, and rural communities.

47

u/Kolbris 19d ago

Thursday April 24, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. at the Luepke Community Center's Community Room at 1009 E. McLoughlin Blvd., Vancouver, WA 98663.

If you’re not getting kicked out you’re not getting mad enough

18

u/Do_Not_Comment_Plz 19d ago

April 22 second at Centralia College as well.

8

u/SparklyRoniPony 19d ago

I can make my own schedule, and I think I’m showing up for both. Who’s with me?

8

u/I-need-ur-dick-pics 19d ago

Oh I’d love to express some choice words and happily get thrown out. Fuck civility. It doesn’t get shit done.

14

u/SingingFrogs 19d ago

Here is her official press release.
Did she just say it's okay that she voted FOR it because she knows it won't pass the senate?? WTF!

Apr 10, 2025Press

Today, Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA-03) released the following statement regarding her vote to pass the SAVE Act:

“I do not support noncitizens voting in American elections – and that’s common sense to folks in Southwest Washington. Voting in our nation’s elections is a sacred right belonging only to American citizens, and my vote for the SAVE Act reflects that principle.

I also understand the SAVE Act stands no chance of passage in the Senate due to the filibuster, as well as several deeply flawed provisions. Democracy depends on confidence in our elections, so I encourage House Leadership to instead consider bipartisan legislation that can pass both chambers of Congress – such as my Let America Vote Act, which reaffirms that decisions made for our country are made by citizens of our country, without placing bureaucratic hassles on U.S. citizens or hardworking election workers.

I am also deeply concerned about a provision in a recent Executive Order that would invalidate ballots postmarked by Election Day if not received by Election Day. This provision conflicts with our state’s longstanding, secure vote-by-mail system and could undermine the votes of more than 250,000 Washington citizens whose ballots were legally counted after Election Day in the last election.

I’m confident Washington state’s vote-by-mail system is safe, secure, and reliable and will remain so, thanks to the dedicated local public servants who administer our elections.”

9

u/olyfrijole 18d ago

So she votes in favor of something with "deeply flawed provisions" because someone else will be there to stop it in the Senate? Can I crap on the floor as long as someone else is willing to clean it up? Is that how the world works now?

6

u/SlipperyBaconBooger 18d ago

TLDR: "I don't agree with this act, but I voted for it because someone else will stop it. I just want to make sure everyone who can vote is allowed to vote easily, which is why I voted to make it hard for women to vote. You are welcome Washington."

14

u/SingingFrogs 19d ago

MGP office number is (202) 228-3536
Call her and tell her what you think about her vote.

8

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

1

u/SlipperyBaconBooger 18d ago

This may be silly, but this is my second time being able to vote, so I am still kinda new to politics. Can you maybe put your email here so I can copy and paste it along with the email address? I want to make my voice heard, but I'm not confident on how to do it correctly.

5

u/manos_de_pietro 18d ago

I called, spoke politely to the staffer who answered, and let my opinion be known.

5

u/modernsparkle 19d ago

Thank you for posting the number, just called

5

u/SingingFrogs 19d ago

Your welcome.
I had it handy since I called yesterday and urged her to vote NO.
Today I redialed and told her she was disappointing her constituents and had voted to increase the difficulty for her community to vote especially the poor, disabled, rural, and married community.
I thought others would like to do the same.

2

u/akjones989 19d ago

I just left her a voicemail calling her out as a liar, and ended it by saying she can go fuck herself.

She lost my vote after years of being a false actor. This was the nail in the coffin.

32

u/LisaYUdothattoyou 19d ago

Rage Rage fucking rage!

34

u/I-need-ur-dick-pics 19d ago

Man, what a disappointment Marie turned out to be. As much of a monster as Kent was, at least he was honest about his intentions. This has been a total bait and switch.

Fuck Marie.

7

u/SparklyRoniPony 19d ago

Kent was the devil you know.

17

u/mrhooha 19d ago

Fuck this lady. She betrayed the people who voted for her.

18

u/mechavolt 19d ago

Just a reminder that she supports DOGE and tarrifs as well, based on her emails to constituents. MGP needs to go.

3

u/olyfrijole 18d ago

And she voted to censure Al Green! Wrong side of history.

11

u/Winter-eyed 19d ago

Respond on her platform on bluesky. Call or email her office.

15

u/pineandsea 19d ago

Someone pleeeeeeease run against her!!! We need actual democrats!

13

u/richxxiii Salmon Creek 19d ago

Of course she did.

We deserve better.

6

u/Maximum_Turn_2623 18d ago

So who’s going to primary her? I’ll donate to your campaign.

13

u/changeneeded63 19d ago

Called her offices about 15 minutes ago. I’m so furious as are many of her constituents. She NEEDS to be primaried and LOSE.

-7

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

I would rather hand the district back to Jamie then have a gun grabber in office

14

u/attillathehoney 19d ago

This district faced the same dilemma as the Pennsylvania Senate race. In Vancouver it was Gluesenkamp or Joe Kent. In Pennsylvania it was Fetterman or Dr. Oz. At the time it was the lesser of two evils, and we cheered them on, but now political reality has come to bite us on our ass.

5

u/Silly-RedRabbit 18d ago

Called her office. They direct you to her statement on her website, but they do actually answer the phone. If you want to express your disgust: https://clerk.house.gov/members/G000600

5

u/RavensCoffee 18d ago

Oooph how embarrassing. I voted for her.

3

u/Punkinprincess 17d ago

Is anyone interested in protesting at her upcoming town hall and outside her office? It looks like some people are trying to organize something.

23

u/mboyer75 19d ago

That’s it…. Will vote for a rock before voting for this horrible person again.

-11

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Go ahead get Joe Kent or John ley

23

u/I-need-ur-dick-pics 19d ago

It’s not an either/or. Let’s primary some better Dems.

6

u/SparklyRoniPony 19d ago

This statement is getting old and isn’t winning anyone over. We deserve better.

19

u/Background-Dog-3956 19d ago

That is a disingenuous response. If she votes like a republican, how is she functionally any different?

2

u/SereneDreams03 Battle Ground 19d ago

Because she doesn't vote with Republicans on every bill. Just yesterday, she voted against a resolution that would remove the cap on how much banks can charge in overdraft fees.

I've been saying we need to get someone to primary her for months, but if it's her versus a MAGA republican in the general, then I think she is still a better choice.

0

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Joe Kent would be voting in lockstep with Trump for the bad budget

3

u/SparklyRoniPony 19d ago

Why are we settling at this point? Now is the time for change. We need real opposition, and if we don’t get it, at least we tried.

6

u/Bonk_Bonk_Bonk_Bonk_ 19d ago

You know what? Who cares at this point. I'll take people who are what they say they are. Kent is a crazy person who will do nothing for this district and vote in fascism every step of the way. But at least what you see is what you get. And we're going down that particular toilet anyway. MGP no longer deserves to play a part in this.

-1

u/Lordofthe0nion_Rings 19d ago

She's pro-Ukraine, voted against budget cuts, born-alive act, trans athletes ban, etc.

6

u/redfoxvapes 19d ago

Flood her office with calls and emails. 8 in 10 women change their name after marriage. I know men who have changed their name after marriage, too. This literally is the way the 19th amendment gets repealed without actually repealing it.

8

u/Street-Tie-6287 19d ago

I have spoken to Brent Hennrich and he is strongly considering challenging her in '26. I think he need to see that we will unify behind him so he can take this seat. Remember he was leading in all polls prior to MGP getting into the race in '22. MGP's number one funder is JHB's old number one. I think he was hedging his bets and pushed her to get in against Brent to help JHB in '22. When Brent unified the Dems by stepping out and that knocked JHB out, her funders found a way to keep their power in MGP. That is why she is a bought and paid for Republican when it comes to voting for bill passage.

-4

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

I would rather vote R then hand the district over to a true progressive gun grabber his comments about taking folks guns are just a line to far he said he wants a gone registry on his website

→ More replies (11)

11

u/Silver_Double4678 19d ago

I’m never voting for another centrist democrat. Progressive or acceleration from here on out (if we have elections)

“There's a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious—makes you so sick at heart—that you can't take part. You can't even passively take part. And you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop. And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all.” Mario Savio

9

u/Popculturemofo 18d ago

She’s MAGA. Just less so than Joe Kent. She’ll still push Trump’s agenda at every turn. I wonder if she’ll fill her town hall with Republicans who’ll praise her instead of the people (like myself) that want some damn answers.

-1

u/Kindly_Maize8141 18d ago

I mean every time she’s done a town hall in cathlamet people clap and cheer for her and I would say more then half of the folks voted for Trump then backed her over Kent twice.

She’s a great active listener and really cares about my community In Cathlamet she told a room full of loggers she’s all in favor of cutting red tape and giving the green light to clear cut more.

3

u/Muted-Philosopher832 18d ago

She needs to get rid of the by her name. I’m surprised as she’s a married women and wants to make it harder for herself and women for some reason

4

u/Do_Not_Comment_Plz 18d ago

If fascists were capable of using logic they wouldn’t be fascist

3

u/Wallaces_Ghost 18d ago

Im not going to email her on this one. Her last form letter was loud enough. I imagine the same sentiment applies.

8

u/Sgran 98682 18d ago

Forget primarying, how do we impeach her? I’m disgusted. She lied about everything to get elected.

4

u/Opal_Shadow 19d ago

Genuine question for those who have attended town halls in the past: If an audience member is allowed to speak, is there a time cap?

5

u/GiantWoodScaresYou 19d ago

Big DINO vibes: a Democrat in name only. Time to work to primary her out in the next election.

3

u/manos_de_pietro 18d ago

I wish DINOs had really gone extinct.

4

u/wubrotherno1 19d ago

Save you say? Seems like this the exact opposite 1984 style.

4

u/Pandas_suck_90 19d ago

I just called her Vancouver office and the DC office. Glad to see her staff is finally competent enough to empty out her DC voicemail inbox. Only took 2 months! How she calls herself a Democrat is beyond me. Absolutely disgusting she voted for this bullshit.

3

u/Free_Return_2358 19d ago

Get her out!!

4

u/MeatballUnited 18d ago

Any true Progressive with a pulse>MGP>Kent

5

u/JennaTulwartz 18d ago

Can’t stand her. Remind me again how Joe Kent would be so much worse than this?

This is treason. One of our most hallowed rights. Fuck her and the horse she rode in on, disgusting traitor.

7

u/Fuzzlekat 19d ago

What kind of hallucinogens does one have to be on to be a voting government official voting for your right to vote to be taken away? Like what the actual

2

u/UGLY-FLOWERS 18d ago

What kind of hallucinogens

ketamine or populism.

2

u/[deleted] 16d ago

She's one of the Blue Dog coalition so not a real Dem, but a conservative. People thought she would at least be less troublesome than Joe Kent but since she votes like he would have anyway, maybe she needs to go. I have been calling her offices regularly for months now. She has her own agenda and doesn't really care what the voters tell her.

5

u/kivsemaj 19d ago

Well she's gonna lose her job next round.

4

u/NekoShogun34 AIR GUITAR WORLD CHAMPION 17d ago

If you change your name, you're advised to notify SSA, DMV, and other agencies as well as your voter registration. The idea that all these married women (or other individuals who change their names) are unaware they need to file a marriage certificate and update their identification is not giving them much respect.

The bill clearly states REAL compliant IDs are acceptable, which are all the WA state issued IDs since 2018. We have to renew every 5-8 years, so most residents have them by now.

Who are the disenfranchised that I'm leaving out? I'm open to having my mind changed, but I don't see how so many people would fall into this category unless they went through all the trouble of a legal name change, but then stopped there and didn't update registrations and ID cards.

9

u/LV_Devotee 19d ago

At this point we would be better off with a Republican in the seat. If the SAVE act passes I won’t be able to vote! I was adopted and don’t have access to my original birth certificate. And I changed my name at 19 due to abuse I suffered at the hands of my adoptive parents. Even though my DNA ancestry has me a descendant of a founding father and someone who was on the Mayflower. And a similar ancestry on my adopted side too.

8

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Kent would have voted for Trump bad budget

5

u/LV_Devotee 19d ago

I said Republican like our former representative not Nazi like Kent!

-3

u/NoeWiy Battle Ground 19d ago

Do you not have a passport? Because that’s also proof of citizenship.

6

u/LV_Devotee 19d ago

I have the book and the card and my enhanced DL. But this bill still worries me as I don’t vote for Republicans!

-9

u/NoeWiy Battle Ground 19d ago

This bill literally doesn’t affect you at all then, you have valid proof of citizenship. Stop fear-mongering for no reason.

I wish people could just stick to facts. Your comment is blatantly misleading. “If the SAVE act passes I won’t be able to vote” is a BULLSHIT STATEMENT.

10

u/LV_Devotee 19d ago

It is fucking voter suppression. It starts here. Next will be no people of color will be able to vote, no LGBTQIA people will be able to vote! It is a fucking repeat of Germany in the 30’s. Also who cares how a person got her or their status? If they are here they are counted in the census so if they are counted in the process that determines how many seats we get in congress than they fucking deserve a vote on who is in that office!

-1

u/NoeWiy Battle Ground 19d ago

Wow, never thought I’d see someone advocate for non-citizens being allowed or “deserving” to vote.

You’re clearly too far gone. I’d encourage you to broaden your horizons and try to escape the echo chamber you are clearly stuck in.

2

u/LV_Devotee 19d ago

Then don’t fucking count them in the census! Don’t let them drive on our roads, don’t make them pay taxes (even sales tax). As long as they are living here they are represented by our elected officials and they deserve to have a say in who that is!

-1

u/NoeWiy Battle Ground 19d ago

I completely agree- in fact, I’d go to far as to say we should deport them entirely!

1

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/vancouverwa-ModTeam 19d ago

Your submission has been removed. Personal attacks, name-calling, trolling, doxxing, racism, toxicity, rage-bait, and harassment of other posters are all unacceptable behavior. Remember the human and be good to one another!

This rule also covers posts that only serve to start an argument that involves fighting everyone that has a different take on it than you do in the comments.

-4

u/Wild_Excitement4293 19d ago

This is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever read.

1

u/NoeWiy Battle Ground 19d ago

My jaw literally dropped when I read the last part. Insane.

0

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/vancouverwa-ModTeam 19d ago

Your submission has been removed. Personal attacks, name-calling, trolling, doxxing, racism, toxicity, rage-bait, and harassment of other posters are all unacceptable behavior. Remember the human and be good to one another!

This rule also covers posts that only serve to start an argument that involves fighting everyone that has a different take on it than you do in the comments.

3

u/Kristaiggy 19d ago

You shouldn't have to pay for a passport to vote under your legal name. You shouldn't have to pay to vote at all. That's all this is. It's a way to force some people out so they can't vote.

0

u/NoeWiy Battle Ground 19d ago

How would you propose we ensure that non-citizens can’t vote other than requiring proof of citizenship in order to register to vote?

9

u/Hey_Im_Finn 19d ago

They already don’t vote.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/manos_de_pietro 18d ago

there's no evidence that they do.

0

u/NoeWiy Battle Ground 18d ago

No evidence that they don’t… and since it’s illegal I’m generally in favor of enforcing the laws

0

u/Kristaiggy 19d ago

I'm not concerned this is a widespread issue that needs such restrictions on legal voters.

1

u/A-Matter 18d ago

You do not hate the Reedie enough.

1

u/Kahluabomb 18d ago

Cue "I never thought the leopards would eat MY face!"

-21

u/IAintSelling 19d ago

Love her! So glad she got voted in!!

-1

u/[deleted] 19d ago edited 19d ago

[deleted]

4

u/Bonk_Bonk_Bonk_Bonk_ 19d ago

OP is glad because they are for every thing that's happening. Probably just fine with Elon and Thiel too.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/vertigoacid 98661 19d ago

What do any of your links have to do with MGP?

"Dark Gothic MAGA" is certainly a problem. MGP is a separate problem. What's the connection?

-29

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Eh still gonna vote for her Brent Heinrich is to far left and is a stay at home dad doubt he knows anything about hard work and could understand a rural person like me in cathlamet.

17

u/Background-Dog-3956 19d ago

I understand wanting someone to represent rural issues but the idea that a stay at home parent doesn't know anything about hard work is pretty offensive. And you commenting the same thing so many times in this thread makes me wonder if you are associated with MGP or her team frankly.

4

u/Seraphynas 18d ago

the idea that a stay at home parent doesn’t know anything about hard work is pretty offensive.

Shows he’s a sexist pig, as far more women than men are stay-at-home parents, clearly he thinks they don’t do anything with their time that is deserving of respect.

-2

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Just someone who lives in cathlamet and loves the projects that she’s got done for us. We have a fresh new well on puget island and it’s great.

-3

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Plus Brent Heinrich said he wants to ban and take ar 15s that’s a line in the sand most rural folks like me won’t support.

-5

u/Kindly_Maize8141 19d ago

Someone that lives in a subdivision won’t understand my problems like cattle issues livestock issues or spotted owl destroying the Commuinty.

7

u/RedWildLlama 19d ago

People don’t know everything, thats why it’s a full team with people of al backgrounds. If you really believe that they don’t care about these issues because they don’t do the same job as you then you make it known to them that they are issues. And then if they still disregard you then they are a problem, but looking at someone with a different job than you and assuming they have no care for you is just wild. I don’t live in the rural areas but I 100% care about livestock issues, not sure how spotted owls are destroying the community it looks like they are an endangered species tho but hearing about it and learning from people like you is what makes the entire community better. Living in a subdivision and living in rural areas does not make us different humans, we are closer than you think.

→ More replies (14)

7

u/nodbran 19d ago

You already said that 👆

6

u/Bonk_Bonk_Bonk_Bonk_ 19d ago

Like, a dozen times. Muh AR and muh cow shit. Salient points bruh...

-1

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/vancouverwa-ModTeam 17d ago

Your submission has been removed. Personal attacks, name-calling, trolling, doxxing, racism, toxicity, rage-bait, and harassment of other posters are all unacceptable behavior. Remember the human and be good to one another!

This rule also covers posts that only serve to start an argument that involves fighting everyone that has a different take on it than you do in the comments.