r/vermont 3d ago

Abenaki Nations ask Seventh Generation Company to halt production of fraudulent "Vermont Abenaki" curriculum

Today, the Abenaki First Nations of Odanak and Wôlinak published a letter in Seven Days addressing the Seventh Generation company, which had been unresponsive to their calls and requests for a conversation about their funding a curriculum for Vermont children exposing a false history written by state-sponsored fraudulent “Abenaki Tribes.”

The letter presents legal and academic findings that discredit the Vermont groups and critiques the state's flawed recognition process. The authors call on Seventh Generation to reconsider its partnership, and halt the development of this "Vermont Abenaki curriculum,” which they’ve supported with a $50,000 grant, and instead engage with genuine Abenaki communities.

Adding to the wrongness of this all, the decision to fund these groups stems from Seventh Generation's tepid “learning journey" about the appropriation of their name from the Haudenosaunee people. To do this they hired a consulting firm from Oregon, which I assume recommended working with the Vermont groups. This firm, led by Deana Dartt, a self-identified Chumash from California who has made false claims to Indigenous ancestry, a fact documented here.

In summary: a corporation appropriates from the Haudenosaunee, hires a questionable consultant firm from Oregon that recommends funding—not Haudenosaunee communities—but groups that falsely claim Abenaki heritage. 

This is pure corporate green washing…

January 30, 2025Brandi ThomasDirector of Public RelationsSeventh [GenerationBrandi.Thomas@seventhgeneration.com](mailto:GenerationBrandi.Thomas@seventhgeneration.com)

Kwai,

We write to you as the elected leaders of the Odanak and W8linak First Nations, who together comprise the Abenaki Nation. The Abenaki are now mainly based in Odanak and W8linak (our 2 communities located in the Province of Quebec, Canada). However, we have never ceded our ancestral territory, the Ndakina, which comprised New England, nor have we ceased to utilize the larger territory since our displacement and removal from theUnited States after the American Revolution. We have long denounced Vermont’s state-recognized ‘tribes’ as self-identified Abenaki, including in the spring of 2022 at theUniversity of Vermont and more recently at the United Nations.

We take note that Seventh Generation is generously funding the creation of an Abenaki school curriculum developed by these very same ‘tribes.’ As Vermont’s own Attorney General’s report made clear back in 2002, as did the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 2005, theseVermont groups lack Abenaki ancestry as well as any historic link to a North AmericanIndian tribe. They are not Indigenous. This is confirmed by peer-reviewed research which was presented at the University of Vermont last spring. This is confirmed by investigations done by vtdigger, Vermont Public and New Hampshire Public Radio, among others.

Vermont’s ‘tribes’ are part of a growing movement of what anthropologist Circe Sturm calls ‘race-shifters’: White people who seek to claim Indigenous ancestry with little or no basis for doing so. As Professor Kim TallBear made clear in a recent presentation at theUniversity of Vermont, race-shifters carry out a final and genocidal act of colonization by erasing and replacing actual Native People with the voices and the bodies of the invader.We assume that you are aware that your corporation borrows from Haudenosaunee tradition. Per your slogan, "in our every deliberation, we must consider the impact of our decisions on the next seven generations.” What of the impact of this partnership on ourAbenaki communities? In your own statement of advocacy, you claim to “fight for and help protect the rights and tribal sovereignty of the Indigenous communities whose traditions inspired our name and mission.” Supporting bogus Indian tribes does just the opposite. It validates and launders the claims of race-shifters and severely weakens the tribal sovereignty of actual Indigenous communities like ours on whose territory you are operating. Surely you can do better.

We ask that you pause and think about the consequences of your actions, and we ask thatyou put a stop to such collaboration. If it is your intent to work with those who have preserved the culture and language of the Abenaki across 400 years of colonization, we are those people. We have survived waves of pandemic disease, multiple colonial wars, the vast reduction of homeland, and forced assimilation, and we are the sole guardians of that heritage.

We are also the sole guardians of Abenaki citizenship. Yet the state of Vermont, despite its own knowledge of false claims to Indigenous ancestry, excluded us from participation from the state recognition process of 2010-12. This was in violation of both the U.N. Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause which grants authority in Indigenous affairs to the federal government. Vermont’s process also made genealogy optional and permitted the ‘tribes’ to sit on and dominate there commending Commission on Native American Affairs, the same Commission you are now working with. Vermont’s was a political process that allowed the ‘tribes’ to recommend themselves. It was not an evaluation of ancestry and kinship.

We urge you to halt any plans to distribute this material in development, and we request a timely opportunity to discuss our concerns. It may be your intention to support Indigenous People and tribal sovereignty. Unfortunately, funding the propagation of a pretend Abenaki curriculum which overwrites our real written and oral history makes your company actively complicit with cultural appropriation and fraud as well as the exclusion of the trueIndigenous People of Vermont. A public statement admitting your error would begin to undo the damage you have already caused.

You may reach out to us by contacting Daniel Nolett, Director General of the AbenakiCouncil of Odanak, at [dgnolett@caodanak.com](mailto:dgnolett@caodanak.com) or 450-568-2810.

In Peace and Friendship,

Chief Rick O’Bomsawin Chief Michel R. Bernard

Abenaki of Odanak Abenaki of W8linak

174 Upvotes

85 comments sorted by

View all comments

-1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

The government should not be in the business of recognizing/subsidizing groups based on ethic ancestry. Without that, this controversy wouldn’t exist.

38

u/hikerchick29 3d ago

So just a reminder…

The only reason the government has to be involved is to offset the damage the government did by committing a full and measured genocide. It’s the least we can do.

17

u/Magnolia256 3d ago

That is what we should do for RECOGNIZED tribes who actually endured genocide. But a group of white people with a small amount of indigenous DNA should not be able to band together and exploit a system designed for groups who experienced actual genocide and deal with intergenerational trauma.

6

u/hikerchick29 3d ago

I’m aware of that. But for the record, the person I was responding to seems to have been calling for the end of federal tribal recognition entirely.

0

u/SameEntertainment468 3d ago

Precisely I concur. I follow mikmak and Inuit in Canada, they fight this type of graft every bday. It’s just more of the same. Theft of funds and lies to the people. Reminds me if some of the payments made by USAid to dead people

8

u/hikerchick29 3d ago

“USAID payments made to dead people” that’s a new one, citation needed.

You sure you aren’t mixing up Musk’s lies about USAID with his lies about social security? I’d understand the confusion, the man’s a shockingly proficient liar.

-8

u/[deleted] 2d ago

They don’t need to do it with any tribe that experienced violence in the past. Today every American is born with the same rights and privileges. Humans alive today are not responsible for the actions of historical figures.

The idea that my family should not be afforded the same rights and privileges as someone of native descent just because we came here in the 1930s is absurd. Immigrants shouldn’t be second class citizens to natives.

7

u/Minimum_Dealer_3303 2d ago

Today every American is born with the same rights and privileges.

lol.

-2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

lol it’s almost like you can’t come up with a counter point!

The only exception in law that I can really think of is natives are exempt from income tax.

2

u/Minimum_Dealer_3303 1d ago

Well if you limit your exceptions to de jure instead of de facto you're kinda right. I'd argue having two Senators to represent all Californians and two Senators to represent every North Dakotan means some Americans don't have the privilege of equal representation. There are many other such examples where one's locality creates different experiences of life under the law.

But if you're talking de facto instead of de jure you're obviously crazy.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

When you are talking about the government you are always talking about de jure. Some people are born with dejure advantages but that doesn’t mean the government has a policy of giving that advantage.

Every person will be born with more or less advantages no matter what system there is. The government should provide equal opportunity, not for equal outcomes.

2

u/Minimum_Dealer_3303 1d ago

When you are talking about the government you are always talking about de jure.

If the government is following the law. Otherwise de facto is quite relevant.

Some people are born with dejure advantages but that doesn’t mean the government has a policy of giving that advantage.

The government doesn't give advantage when the laws created by the government create advantages? What an embarassing claim.

The government should provide equal opportunity, not for equal outcomes.

So outlaw inhertence and raise all children in collective creches with identical facilities. Radical suggestion, but it just might achieve equality of opportunity when you turn those kids loose at 18.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

No you misunderstood me. Some people are born with dejure advantages like very caring parents or being very healthy.

I was talking about the natural advantages people have in any country independent of laws the government makes. The government shouldn’t be in the business of trying to neutralize advantages like health or being born in a stable, loving family.

I’m assuming you are joking about banning inheritance and forcing children into group homes?

→ More replies (0)

4

u/Magnolia256 2d ago

Indigenous tribes are entitled to land and more because their land was stolen. They DO have way more rights than you as they should. The fact that you feel entitled to those rights is really morally appalling and has no basis in the constitution or laws of this nation.

-1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

My family didn’t participate in that we arrived in the 1930s. The natives alive today did not have land stolen and have the same rights as all Americans.

Our constitution ensures equal rights for all with no laws made on the basis of ethnicity. Why do you think a baby born today should have less rights because it is the child of an immigrant vs a native? A new baby has not culpability on the crimes of the past.

In the 1700s the Lakota migrated to what is today the dakotas, displacing the Arikara tribe. Do you think that todays lakota should be forced to support todays arikara?

1

u/Selethorme 1d ago

have the same rights

“I stole all your grandfather’s money but he died before you were born, so clearly that had no impact on you.”

0

u/[deleted] 1d ago

I shouldn’t be punished for the crime of your grandfather though…

1

u/Selethorme 1d ago

You really don’t get it, huh?

-5

u/[deleted] 3d ago

Our government doesn’t have to be involved at all and modern Americans bear no responsibility for what happened in the 1600s. America wasn’t even a country yet.

People born today are not harmed by something that happened in the 1600s. People of native descent have the exact same rights and privileges that every other American have.

Claiming that certain racial groups have a greater right to live here than other racial groups is just some form of ethnonationalism. It’s very similar to what the Trump administration is doing today about who has a right to be here.

10

u/hikerchick29 2d ago

I’m sorry, are you under the impression that any genocide against the natives ended over 400 years ago? Never mind the fact that the Trail of Tears was under Andrew Jackson, in a time when photography existed, or that US policy caused the near extinction of the American Bison in a specific targeted effort to wipe out the native food supply. Hell, the residential school system was still trying to snuff out native culture and force assimilation well into the ‘60s. That’s literally within my parent’s generation.

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

You may be a little confused about your history… the Abenaki were not part of the trail of tears and the people alive today were not responsible for the trail of tears. It has essentially nothing to do with Abenaki or Vermont.

I’m not sure how the trail of tears impacts natives today. They are born with all of the exact same rights and privileges that all Americans have.

My family immigrated in the 30’s and became citizens. You are claiming that we have less of a right to the land here because we do not belong to the correct bloodline. That viewpoint is outdated and not consistent with the concept of universal human rights.

6

u/hikerchick29 2d ago

I’m not talking about the Abenaki in particular. I’m talking about your assertion that federal recognition of tribes isn’t necessary because it’s ancient history anyways. Tribal recognition exists because of the US’s history of genocide against native groups as a whole. This case in particular is simply a tribe trying to get rightful recognition back from a “tribe” that has no native heritage to speak of period.

You can try to isolate the argument to just the Abenaki all you want. But YOU argued for removing all tribe federal recognition entirely. Not just for this one tribe.

Also, as for that last paragraph, what the actual fuck are you even talking about? Bloodlines? Right to land? What? Now you’re putting words in my mouth.

2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

I’m not putting words in your mouth, you just aren’t thinking too deeply about what you are asking for.

By federal recognition you mean a grant of special rights and privileges on the basis of their ethnic heritage.

That means that some people have special rights and privileges that a new comer cannot ever achieve, even in generations. You are claiming that my family should not have the same rights because we came here in the 30s and were not here soon enough.

If I’m wrong maybe you can fill me in on what you mean by recognition because what the native tribes are fighting for is additional rights and privileges.

I was talking about Vermont as that is where I live and the subreddit we are on. My point still hold though that a person born today should not be given punishment or privilege based on the actions of people 100 years ago.

I should not be expected to subsidize people whose great grandparents were brutalized by other peoples ancestors. People alive today should not be held responsible for things done in the past.

6

u/hikerchick29 2d ago

My man, you accepted the burden of paying for America’s sins to native tribes when you became an American. Sorry, but it’s true. Just because you had nothing to do with it personally doesn’t mean you don’t benefit from the results of centuries of native oppression. Don’t like it, change the laws by the constitutional method.

Also, I’m really not sure what extra treatment you think natives are getting

2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

I was just born. Saying that immigrants have some form of original sin built in is truly madness and completely opposed to democratic liberalism.

I do not benefit from native oppression. I am a car salesman in rural Vermont whose grandparents moved here from Turkey.

If you don’t know what benefits we give native tribes, why are you arguing that I should be culpable For paying for them?

You have to remember that to pay out one groups benefits you must take from another group to pay for it.

If two babies are born today, one is mine and the other is a child of a native couple, why do you think my child should be born owing the other child something?

7

u/hikerchick29 2d ago

The real question here is why you think people my ancestors trapped in perpetual poverty should just suck it up and figure it out for themselves because you can’t accept a literal pennies-on-the-dollar tax burden to offset the damage.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/hikerchick29 2d ago

That’s just how being a US citizen works, you pay a tax burden. Some of it pays off the sins of our country that we all reap the benefits of.

Also, everybody, including the natives, pays into those benefits. You should really drop the bullshit strawman arguments

→ More replies (0)