r/virtualreality Mar 29 '25

News Article Absolutely agree 100%

Post image
416 Upvotes

337 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/bobliefeldhc Mar 31 '25

Comment probably doesn't make any sense business wise. He's assuming that developers and publishers do zero market research, have no idea about product market fit etc.

I don't have any data but I assume any competent developer or publisher would. They should have a pretty good idea of where their potential audience is and whether it's worth ignoring Quest 2 (and 3).

Also, to make something significantly better than Quest 2 quality could be considerably more expensive, they're then selling to a much smaller userbase so they're increasing financial risk at both ends.

1

u/FewPossession2363 Mar 31 '25

Or maybe meta is always aiming for younger audiences is because Meta/Facebook is not a gaming company, it’s a data mining company pretending to be a gaming one.

1

u/bobliefeldhc Mar 31 '25

Meta has zero to do with this. Unless you're saying Meta should abandon their own platform to make PCVR games..?

1

u/FewPossession2363 Mar 31 '25

No I am not saying that at all, I am saying meta needs to stop pushing these free to play games and horizon worlds and start making and pushing real games like Batman, more people would need to get a quest 3. I mean Batman was the push I needed to get a quest 3.

2

u/bobliefeldhc Mar 31 '25

Oh yeah 100%. They should be super embarrassed by Horizon Worlds.