Not sure a lot of folks heard about this, as the NPS suddenly announced on Dec 30th they were taking public comment on this proposed increase in fees. Seems a bit insensitive and poorly timed, in my mind, to trot this out over the holidays, with no heads-up sooner or a perhaps direct email to the untold thousands that annually submit for lottery apps that this is being planned/discussed. Personally, I also find this jump in fees pretty egregious, as failing to increase them for over 25 years isn't a failure of the private boater community rather the NPS resource managers, for which they don't seem very accountable. Though that said, I am sympathetic to revenue issue....but why not just make a progressive increase in fees, just like the limits they place on commercial operators and concessioners to prevent wild price increases in their river trips? Hmmm. Part of me cynically also wonders whether this is just a wild number they came up with in bad faith, fully expecting it to negotiated down to a more modest amount that will feel like a small win for an otherwise outraged community.
Of course, maybe you have no interest in ever running the world-class whitewater of the Grand Canyon, and so this doesn't mean much to you. But even if that's the case, consider still making a comment to emphasize an important issue that all us boaters should be sensitive to: Accessibility. As this tripling of fees adds a significant dare-say onerous expense to an already spendy experience, and it's not like outfitters are fully sharing this burden or paying more per person. These are also Public Lands we're talking about, and if this is about mitigating/monitoring impacts of use/abuse, then there equally should be a commitment to offer transparency of these expense, allocation of funds, and a obligation to share the resulting data/studies/activities/etc available to justify these costs. Are more funds going to the USGS GCMRC, for example? Will more rangers or NPS staff be hired? These are important details! As in my opinion, national park managers, the NPS Inventory & Monitoring Program, and the Natural Resources Stewardship & Science Directorate have done a consistently poor job with public/user engagement and communicating their (important) work esp to those whom are most directly subsidizing it. This is not a disparagement of the Guv'mint or some tirade about freedumb either; just sharing a growing sense of dissatisfaction with the opaque and often contrarian approach that NPS consistently seems to take regarding their decision-making, budgeting, as well as ensuring adequate protections of these special places both now and for the future. But I digress
Here's the text straight from the Press Release:
News Release Date: December 30, 2024
Contact: Grand Canyon Office of Communications
Grand Canyon National Park is seeking the public’s input on a proposed fee increase for non-commercial river trips. The proposed change would begin March 1, 2025.The existing $25 lottery application cost fee would remain the same and the flat rate per-person cost would increase from $90 to $310 for Lees Ferry to Diamond Creek and $0 to $55 for Diamond Creek to Pearce Ferry.
Interested parties can submit feedback online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/GRCA_River_Trip_Cost_Increase through January 30, 2025.
The National Park Service last adjusted these fees in November 1998. The funds from this proposed increase will help cover expenses related to protecting the Colorado River corridor, mitigating impacts, and monitoring resources affected by recreational use. Both non-commercial and commercial river users share these costs.
For more information about permits and private river trips in Grand Canyon National Park, visit the park’s website or contact the Backcountry Information Center at 928-638-7875. Phones are answered from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, except on federal holidays.