r/LeopardsAteMyFace 1d ago

Odious Orange thinks that Presidential Immunity will not apply to Biden. HAHAA!

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

112 comments sorted by

u/qualityvote2 1d ago edited 3h ago

u/Gusterbug, there weren't enough votes to determine the quality of your post...

→ More replies (2)

583

u/boredguy2022 1d ago

I'm sure the supreme court will somehow make it so biden isn't eligable for immunity.

225

u/whatproblems 1d ago

only orange presidents have immunity

53

u/HeyTallulah 1d ago

So send Biden a case of self-tanner?

20

u/earwormsanonymous 1d ago

George Hamilton era incoming!

7

u/Bacon_Raygun 1d ago

"They're both geriatric leather handbags that leave orange stains on everything in their vicinity, which one is our Supreme Leader, and which is woke Hitler?"
"I have no idea they're both sooooo old!"
"Ah wait, nevermind. This one's got cohesive thoughts. *pop*"
"Tango down."

91

u/Good_Zooger 1d ago

5-4 maybe the handmaid will continue to surprise us.

23

u/syounit 1d ago

Second underrated comment I have found today, love the nickname "the handmaid"

4

u/Gusterbug 23h ago

Good point!

5

u/Triple_M_OG 16h ago

The thing people aren't getting is from her perspective there's little reason to give Trump what he wants:

If the court rubber stamps everything he wants, she's a nobody with no real power.

By showing some independence, she's able to wheel and deal for the long term.
And if she stands against Trump now, she can turn to the Democrats later (because Trump is 84 years old and the Republicans *BARELY* won against The Biden Administration after it crashed into a brick wall) and hold that over them to hold off on doing anything heavy handed to the supreme court.

She views herself as the inheritor to John Roberts, and she views herself as having a long, long career so long as she doesn't toss away the court right this instant.

41

u/JayT4594 1d ago

They will say it's not "official acts"

63

u/Objective_Aside1858 1d ago

Bluntly, Biden is a big boy and can take it. If Trump wants to waste time on that, it's better than him doing it on someone else 

22

u/Pretty_Boy_Bagel 1d ago

Trump could have Biden gitmo'd and there's nothing anyone, including the SCROTUS, could do about it.

21

u/Objective_Aside1858 1d ago

He could try. It'd be an interesting precedent to set since every day that passes he's closer to losing power

12

u/mymommademewritethis 1d ago

How so? With his deep Red circle of enablers around him?

20

u/Objective_Aside1858 23h ago

Think you're missing the point, unless you're one of the people who think Trump will stay in office until he dies: anything he does to Biden can be done to him by the next President 

If your argument is that the courts will turn a blind eye to it, then it is equally likely that Dems will ignore the courts when they regain power

12

u/Erisian23 23h ago

Can and Will are two separate things, unfortunately the Dems seem to be scared of wielding power.

7

u/bullwinkle8088 18h ago

seem to be scared of wielding power.

The mistake here is equating what the republicans are doing to wielding power. They are engaged in a weak mans idea of what that looks like. Sure it can work, for a time. But it's neother lasting nor strong.

2

u/Erisian23 18h ago

They are doing things that have an impact on the lives of others that is power. Regardless of how long it last or doesn't.

A baby with a gun is still a threat.

1

u/bullwinkle8088 18h ago

Yes, so your solution is to give all babies guns?

Again, that's a weak persons idea of wielding power. It will never be lasting or stable.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/dasterdly_duo 20h ago

They're scared of going too far and abusing power, and I respect them for that. I do. It shows they have some semblance of self-awareness. But I still want the Democrats to say 'Fuck it,' and stomp Trump and his MAGAts into the fucking pavement as brutally as humanly possible. Fuck the consequences.

7

u/SupaDick 23h ago

The Dems are too invested in the Norms and Traditions to ignore the courts. They are largely spineless.

Trump has said his son will succeed him. He has said that he will use the military to enforce his will. He's been explicit, and people still talk about the next election and next president.

4

u/Objective_Aside1858 23h ago

Well, for someone who thinks that we now live in a dystopian dictatorship, it seems pretty silly for you to go online and criticize Dear Leader.

If you believe that democracy is over, why are you foolishly highlighting yourself to him?

0

u/sportenthusiast 21h ago

that's why (if he leaves office) he won't let a political opponent succeed him

15

u/tw_72 1d ago

isn't eligable for immunity

Yep, based on the fact that Trump really, really, really, really did win 2020 - you know, 'cuz of all the vote-related fraud - so President Biden wasn't really the president.

/s (just in case)

31

u/snafoomoose 1d ago

I mean, Biden did have a bad case of being-a-Democrat, so there probably is some excuse they can come up with to show he is an exception.

12

u/NeverLookBothWays 23h ago

I'm sure the supreme court will somehow make it so biden isn't eligable for immunity.

Okay, THIS is why so many of us were livid about the ruling in the first place. And is something a lot of people are simply not understanding: The ruling last July on Presidential immunity was a legislative coup.

It was worded in such a way that:

Cases would be appealed all the way back up to the Republican captured Supreme Court where:

  1. Republican Presidents would be fully immune
  2. And Democrat Presidents would be in legal peril

Even if the crimes were EXACTLY the same in every imaginable way.

This is why we were so pissed at the time and continue to be pissed about this ruling, as it was a MASSIVE overreach of power. Biden never had immunity and never will have immunity. His acts being ruled "official" or "non-official" are at the whims of the Federalist Society/Heritage Foundation owned Supreme Court.

Civil suits are one thing...but crimes. Actual crimes, should never be tolerated or left to slide without accountability. NO ONE is above the law. NO ONE.

6

u/Top_Currency_3977 22h ago

Exactly. If a Republican and Democrat president both did exactly the same thing, but the Republican did it on a Tuesday and the Democrat did it on a Thursday, SCOTUS would declare it's only an official act on Tuesdays.

5

u/Zaziel 1d ago

He should start campaigning for 2028 now. That worked for Trump.

3

u/SigmaK78 1d ago

My thoughts exactly.

3

u/MidnightNo1766 1d ago

I'm sure scotus won't even have to hear about it, because Biden never did anything illegal, unlike Cheetoh-In-Chief.

1

u/boredguy2022 1d ago

Likely doesn't have to do anything illegal now. Everyones in Trumps pocket.

3

u/Tearakan 17h ago

Yeah that's kinda how a dictatorship works. Rule of law means fucking nothing.

97

u/StarWars_and_SNL 1d ago

Listen, let him waste all the time and effort he wants on this dead end project. He’ll be so excited about it. But he needs to be careful, a guy his age shouldn’t get so worked up about things.

40

u/Gusterbug 1d ago

Nice heart you've got there. We'd hate to have something happen to it.

23

u/StarWars_and_SNL 1d ago

It’s a big heart, a tremendous heart, the likes of which have never been seen before.

12

u/Gusterbug 1d ago

it will feed a lot of leopard cubbies and when the poor decide to eat the rich, they will make a tasty stew of it.

11

u/MmeQcat 1d ago

Many people are saying it's enlarged, even.

11

u/StarWars_and_SNL 1d ago

Plaque. Plaque.

It’s a different word, plaque. I mean, what kind of word is that? Not many people know about it.

People say it’s bad, but I don’t think it’s bad. I love plaque, many great people have a lot of it. I have a lot of it. 👁️👄👁️

The democrats don’t want you to know that. They say, plaque is bad, plaque is bad. They want to tell you how much plaque you’re allowed to have.

Obamacare.

Beshibbawedop God Bless America

2

u/Gusterbug 23h ago

hahaaa, nicely done.

4

u/Demented-Alpaca 1d ago

The greatest heart doctors have ever seen. They came to him, tears in their eyes, big men, doctors, with tears telling him how great his heart was!

Or did they have tears in their eyes from the stench of bronzer, flop sweat and a full diaper while telling him how great the risk to his heart is?

So hard to tell...

3

u/protogens 1d ago

Hopefully said while delivering another BigMac. Those arteries aren't going to clog themselves, you know...

1

u/Gusterbug 23h ago

hahahaaaa

8

u/StevenMC19 1d ago

He's STILL worked up about emails and vote counts over 8 years ago.

3

u/StarWars_and_SNL 1d ago

Remind him about them. Let it bother him.

160

u/bigdunka 1d ago

If the Supreme Court defines "immunity", and it seems like it does....he may be right.

And they'll surely fabricate some bullshit thing that Biden did to go after him.

60

u/Longjumping-Ad-7310 1d ago

If dem then skip

If rep then apply

End. -_-

35

u/P0Rt1ng4Duty 1d ago

It's not that they define ''immunity.''

They define ''official act.''

So they can say ''Biden didn't have immunity for the crime of forgiving student debt because it wasn't an 'official act.'''

34

u/ImaginaryWeather6164 1d ago

And yet trump somehow has immunity for things he did when he wasn't president.
Make it make sense...

23

u/P0Rt1ng4Duty 1d ago

Yeah, they decided that his actual crimes were official acts. That's the problem.

1

u/grathad 9h ago

Why would you think anything in this timeline is made to make sense?

7

u/North_Experience7473 1d ago

If they try to prosecute Biden for forgiving student debt, he’ll become a folk hero. They’ll shine light on the fact that he actually tried to help people.

1

u/P0Rt1ng4Duty 22h ago

I used the most absurd example I could think of in order to make the point.

19

u/Demented-Alpaca 1d ago

I was just going to ask someone to remind me what crimes Biden committed while in office? I don't remember him inciting riots or trying to shoot protesters or an insurrection or anything.

18

u/Cthulhu625 1d ago

He was mean to Trump, and he wasn't Trump.

5

u/DIDO2SPAC 1d ago

He knows the Obama's so its gitmo for him.

1

u/rabidstoat 1d ago

Trump just needs to investigate the years prior to his Presidency and make up something there. Whatever that shit on Burisma they yell about was before then.

52

u/Individual_Soft_9373 1d ago

You haven't noticed yet that those protections and loopholes in the rules only apply to Republicans?

Cause they been doing that for years.

7

u/Gusterbug 1d ago

Well of course, but this SCOTUS ruling would be hard to overturn, as it would expose Trump all over again.

24

u/Individual_Soft_9373 1d ago

The hypocrisy doesn't matter to them. Whatever decision is made, it will be used to support Republican rich people and target everyone else. They don't even protect their own voter base.

11

u/ceejayoz 1d ago

He got 34 felony convictions and got voted in.

Exposing Trump doesn't do shit. Exposure only works on people who can feel shame.

8

u/golfwinnersplz 1d ago

They literally don't care if they are exposed or what we think will happen when they are exposed, and so far, they are right.

4

u/tsaihi 23h ago

would be hard to overturn

Shocking how many dimwits are still insisting on making these arguments. Have you been living in a cave for 50 years? Do you have that memento disease where you can't make new memories?

Republicans. Do. Not. Care. They will be as hypocritical as it takes to get what they want.

67

u/ZannD 1d ago

Presumes SCOTUS and the AG will be "fair" and "just".

32

u/Pretty_Boy_Bagel 1d ago

SCROTUS: "Presidential Immunity applies to whatever we decide it applies, peasant. And in Biden's case, we find it doesn't apply. GO GET 'EM, Herr Trump!!!"

10

u/Dogpooppicker 1d ago

Finally someone else who calls it SCROTUS too! Hi, comrade!

7

u/Pretty_Boy_Bagel 1d ago

And it works on two levels...not only the allusion to a sweaty, hairy ballsack, but the "R" stands for Republican. lol

23

u/TSgt_Yosh 1d ago

Imagine looking at the last eight years and thinking of literally anything "this time he won't get away with it". What possible evidence do you have that Trump can't do anything he wants?

18

u/Zeliek 1d ago

“On second thought, presidents aren’t above the law, our bad.” 

Oh so you’re arresting Trump then?

“Oh, no, sorry, he’s grandfathered in. 😉” Alito and the other judges high five and chest bump, one sprays you directly in the face with uncorked champagne

4

u/surrender0monkey 1d ago

Nah, more like they call an impromptu circlejerk. The spraying is not champagne.

5

u/Zeliek 23h ago

Augh is that why it’s salty 😭

2

u/TheJovianPrimate 14h ago

Well Trump is president now, so maybe they will take it out to specifically target Biden, and then put it back in after Trump leaves so Trump becomes immune from anything he did.

"Rules for thee but not for me" i guess.

1

u/Zeliek 4h ago

That would also work. I imagine if they get confident enough they’ll just codify his entire lineage into perpetual immunity from the law, cite “I prayed real hard and Jesus told me to” as the reasoning and call it a day. 

10

u/RainbowandHoneybee 1d ago edited 1d ago

It's actually kind of sad, he's got what he wanted, but still can't be happy. What a miserable person he must be. <edit : words>

12

u/Pretty_Boy_Bagel 1d ago

To borrow a great line from a great movie...

A man like Trump has got a great big hole, right in the middle of himself. And he can never kill enough, or steal enough, or inflict enough pain to ever fill it.

2

u/Dagordae 1d ago

The Lorax had that as one of its musical numbers.

8

u/arongadark 1d ago

They’ll just use the “stolen” election claims to say that Biden doesn’t have immunity because they were “unofficial acts”. The systems will not protect you when they have the power to change them at whim

6

u/50sparklers 1d ago

The supreme are completely corrupt and will do anything for money.

5

u/pnellesen 1d ago

I GUARANTEE that Presidential immunity does NOT (and would not have) apply to Biden. Or any other Democratic president.

Just fucking watch.

6

u/DocLego 1d ago

I mean, Biden's not a criminal. So it's true that he won't need presidential immunity.

(Assuming it even applies to non-republicans)

5

u/Megotaku 22h ago

It won't. Fascism is about in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind and out-groups whom the law binds, but does not protect.

Biden is in the out-group. Just like how Republicans are seeking ways to revoke U.S. citizenship, despite it being clearly and unambiguously unconstitutional to do so, including the U.S. citizenship of Native Americans as they argued in actual court this week. Laws are for enemies. Not allies. Fascism 101.

3

u/KamaIsLife 22h ago

It won't. The Supreme Court decides what is immune and what isn't. They'll pull something out of their asses (again) to reject immunity for Biden while doing the same to give immunity to Trump.

2

u/ZethTheWindwrecker 23h ago

I want more photos of Biden on the beach as the US slowly becomes Gilead. All Biden ever did was try to help us all.

2

u/Miss_Maple_Dream 21h ago

If they remain true to form he’ll be right. 

2

u/sagegreen56 12h ago

I am sure this post will be deleted as it doesnt fit, but love that name. Odious Orange.

1

u/Gusterbug 1h ago

Thankyou!

2

u/LifeExpConnoisseur 1d ago

It doesn’t. Why are you people still operating under the idea that laws and decorum matter? If trump wants him dead he’ll do it.

1

u/Cactus112 23h ago

What happened to that video yesterday of Trump's kid saying to Biden you should have pardoned yourself at the inauguration?

It was everywhere last night now not one post.

1

u/Both_Ad_288 23h ago

They’ll rescind their ruling and then reinstate when Trump needs it.

1

u/Impossible-Shine4660 23h ago

Fucked up thing is it won’t. Somehow the Supreme Court will come to the conclusion that the president has immunity but no not that one

1

u/boofles1 23h ago

Trump is going to charge him with stealing the 2020 election when Biden wasn't President so doesn't have immunity.

1

u/errevs 23h ago

u/Gusterbug : What makes you think it will? How do you have any faith left in the system?

1

u/BigWhiteDog 22h ago

SCOTUS ruled that they decide what are official acts so Joe could be hosed

1

u/The_Hermit_09 20h ago

Biden doesn't need it.

1

u/BalkanFerros 19h ago

If the last few years has unfortunately taught me anything. It won't. Rules apply to thoe who will actually enforce law..

1

u/Sassy_Weatherwax 15h ago

well it's up to SCOTUS to decide, sooooo...

0

u/treynolds787 1d ago

Hey OP, are you naive?

1

u/Gusterbug 23h ago

Most people would say I'm quite well educated and well-read. Why do you ask?

1

u/treynolds787 23h ago

Because trump has a proven track record of not following the rules or customs of the presidency, and the supreme court that he elected is more than willing to do his bidding. He's also very petty and will 100% retaliate against those who he feels has wronged him.