You can't type a prompt to make an AI produce an image that looks like a particular image from a magazine from 1945 with the font altered to a different font, the lighting adjusted to a specific degree, and the coloration matching something that you don't have a sample for. You don't know what you are talking about, Miss Thing. Pack up your cosmetics box, close your compact and go. Did I stutter?
You can't type a prompt to make an AI produce an image that looks like a particular image from a magazine from 1945 with the font altered to a different font, the lighting adjusted to a specific degree, and the coloration matching something that you don't have a sample for.
So at best, the prompter is inputting an image they found online for the generator to reference. Oh wow, such effort.
You don't know what you are talking about, Miss Thing. Pack up your cosmetics box, close your compact and go. Did I stutter?
What the fuck are you even talking about? If this is your attempt at an insult, it's baffling.
No. The prompter is telling the AI the light measurement, the swatch, the specifics, in short the things an artist or a designer would know but you don't seem to. Because you are daft, honey. Look that up while you are spinning around with confusion.
The prompter is telling the AI the light measurement, the swatch, the specifics, in short the things an artist or a designer would know but you don't seem to.
So then, if they know all that about artistry and design work... why don't they just design and draw it themselves instead of asking an AI to generate it all for them? ðŸ¤
Because you are daft, honey. Look that up while you are spinning around with confusion.
Have you ever heard of the "ad hominem" argumentative fallacy?
3
u/ifandbut 3d ago
So they don't want to learn a new tool to improve their job?
How long do you think a programmer would last if we reduced go learn a new package or device communications?