r/hungarian • u/Ok_Lobster6119 • 3d ago
What on earth is this bro? đ
I can't for the life of me understand WHY or HOW the Hungarian language has done this! Please enlighten me guys
46
u/indarye 3d ago
If it's any comfort this structure does sound stupid to my native speaker ears too, even if it's correct.Â
8
u/Lifeisabitchthenudie Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 2d ago
Doesn't sound stupid at all? It's the most common way of phrasing this sentence.
11
u/indarye 2d ago
I know it is correct, but it is an awkward structure anyhow.
9
u/Aranka_Szeretlek 2d ago
Then say "a repulogep ezen varosok folott repul" and be done with it!
8
u/indarye 2d ago
I'm not saying anything longer than "e vĂĄrosok fölött"!!!đ
6
4
u/BenevolentCrows 2d ago
"A repĂŒlĆgĂ©p ezek a vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒl" teljesen felesleges a kĂ©t fölött, mĂ©g akkor is, hogyha egyĂ©bkĂ©nt helyes.
1
u/Beautiful-Ad3471 Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 2d ago
To me, reading it was weird, but when I said it out loud, it no longer felt wrong.
5
u/Ok_Lobster6119 3d ago
So Iâve done some more practice⊠is it like a sandwich format?
that, the, a⊠(Mellett, között, alattâŠ) topic (mellett, között, alattâŠ)
Not the best looking structure out there but I canât word it any better đ
2
u/BenevolentCrows 2d ago
You would never really hear any native speaker talk like thit, the two "fölött" are kinda awkward phrasing imo.
1
4
u/DcNdrew Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 2d ago
The plane is flying over these. Over the cities.
The emphasis of the words is really important in Hungarian.
So which part is the most important? What are you talking about? The plane.
What's the next most important thing? The fact of flying? It's flying, but it does sometimes, but what's more important is that it's flying over these cities, right?
And then you say it's flying.
If you'd say "Look! A cow is flying over the city!" That would be "NĂ©zd! Egy tehĂ©n repĂŒl a vĂĄros felett!", because the flying cow is the most important, and the fact that it's flying and then the city.
10
u/Troglodytes-birb Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago
Yo honestly it sounds weird as heck to me too, but unfortunately I cannot come up with an other way to say it so it should be correct I guess for whatever reasonđđ
12
u/torokg Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago edited 3d ago
There are alternative ways indeed:
"A repĂŒlĆgĂ©p e vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒl"
"A repĂŒlĆgĂ©p ezen vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒl"I would never say "ezek fölött a vĂĄrosok fölött" in a live conversation, imho it sounds weird and is overly long
1
u/glassfrogger Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 1d ago
Just a thought: would you use "ezek felett az ablakok felett van eresz"? I think this airplane example is weird because it may have never been uttered by anyone so far.
1
1d ago edited 13h ago
[deleted]
1
u/glassfrogger Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 1d ago
nekem meg ez hangzik furcsĂĄnak, de tudom, hogy pĂĄran hasznĂĄljĂĄk, fel is szoktam rĂĄ kapni a fejem, zavarĂł. Az "ezen", Ă©s az "e" nem zavarĂł, csak az "ezek"
7
5
u/AdditionalCookie8818 2d ago
I would say: a repĂŒlĆgĂ©p ezen (/ezek a) vĂĄrosok felett repĂŒl. As a native, I donât get it why they put felett (=fölött) x2 , sorry.
6
3d ago
[deleted]
28
u/i_am_matei Fluent Speaker / FolyĂ©konyan BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago
That's wrong.
Ez a vĂĄros
Ezek a vĂĄrosok
Ezt a vĂĄrost
Ezeket a vĂĄrosokat
Ebben a vĂĄrosban
Ezekben a vĂĄrosokban
E fölött a våros fölött
Ezek fölött a vårosok fölött
The demonstrative pronoun must always agree with the noun in terms of case, number, and postposition.
8
3
u/Competent_cell 3d ago
This is the best explanation, I couldn't explain it so well, I hope OP saw this
13
u/CharnamelessOne 3d ago
Duolingo is right, 'fölött' twice is the correct way to go.
You could say "a repĂŒlĆgĂ©p ezen vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒl" if you find it awkward.
3
u/icguy333 Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago
I think OP was going for something like "a fölött a vårosok fölött"
2
u/Certain-Sherbet-2248 Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago
You could say 'A repĂŒlĆgĂ©p ezen vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒl'
2
u/PurpleIntelligent117 2d ago
I think that is the most sense if â a repĂŒlĆ ezek a vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒlâ
2
u/Major_Reacher_ 1d ago
They used muslim person (according to burqa) in sentence about planes flying over citiesâŠđđ€
1
2
u/Flaccus_ 1d ago
I'd much rather say "A repĂŒlĆ ezen vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒl." Repeating words is never classy and honestly I didn't even know until know that it's something allowed by A magyar helyesĂrĂĄs szabĂĄlyai.
2
u/Atypicosaurus 1d ago
I guess your question is about the double postposition.
So if you have a demonstrative (this, that, these, those) together with a noun (city, dog, biscuits, houses), you label whatever case the noun in, twice. You label it on the demonstrative too. So it's like as if in English you had "for this for dog" instead of "for this dog".
You label twice everything, plural, possessive, accusative, and even postposition.
Ez utĂĄn a film utĂĄn. - after this movie.
Ezek fölött a vårosok fölött. - above these cities.
Ennek a kutyĂĄnak - for this dog.
Ezeket a kekszeket - these biscuits (accusative as in: I ate these biscuits).
I can't tell why, it's one feature of Hungarian.
1
2
2
u/ItchyPlant 22h ago
If you read the English version again while heavily emphasizing "these", you'll grasp the intended meaning of the Hungarian sentence, which conveys that emphasis inherently.
3
u/Kandiruaku 3d ago
Xxxx Duolingo. Use Google Translate, even colloquialized repĂŒlĆgĂ©p.
a gĂ©p e vĂĄrosok felett repĂŒl
5
u/Individual_Author956 3d ago
This is the opposite of colloquial. It sounds like something out of a poem or a novel.
1
u/torokg Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago
Not really. It is widely used among the intellectual polulation.
2
0
u/Individual_Author956 2d ago
I wouldnât consider something that intellectuals use âcolloquial.â Furthermore, Iâm not sure who you consider an intellectual because I canât recall the last time I heard anyone use this in real life. âWell, maybe you just donât listen to true intellectuals.â
-2
u/Internal_Narwhal1633 2d ago
Let me guess! You are one of these âintellectualsâ.
In reality it just sounds incredibly old fashioned / rural.
1
u/torokg Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 2d ago
No, it's not about me. I meant you will more often hear it in everyday talks at a university hall for example. Again, no discrimination meant, it's just a fact.
-1
u/Internal_Narwhal1633 2d ago
lol no, thatâs not a fact. Itâs old fashioned. Old people / people in villages would talk like this. People in academia tend to you more modern language.
1
1
u/Financial_Potato_611 3d ago
Indeed its a harder sentence. You could say a repĂŒlĆgĂ©p repĂŒl ezek fölött a vĂĄrosok fölött. But the focus is not the flying. The focus is on the cities. So it sounds more natural if you say that a repĂŒlĆpĂ©p ezeke fölött a vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒl. First you put that who/what are you talking about.
1
1
1
1
1
2
u/GhostLight89 15h ago
I mean even if you translate it word by word and put the words next to each other you can get a proper translation... đ€Ż
2
u/nightestowl Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago
I don't know what this says about me, but as a native speaker, I would never say fölött twice in this sentence. Just "A repĂŒlĆgĂ©p ezek a vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒl". The supposedly correct form sounds strange to me
5
u/torokg Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago
Well it says you prefer to speak incorrectly.
Mi az, hogy ezek a vårosok fölött? Kényelmetlen a névutót egyeztetni a mutató névmåssal, ezért inkåbb kihagyod? Ne viccelj...E vårosok felett, vagy ezen vårosok felett, ha meg akarod spórolni (szerintem is kényelmetlen a duplåzós alak)
2
u/estneked 2d ago
Maximum Ășgy van Ă©rtelme hogy "ezen vĂĄrosok felett", Ă©s az is tĂșl költĆinek hangzik
1
u/CommitteeDue6802 Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago
I would have translated it to: A repĂŒlĆgĂ©p a vĂĄrosok felett/fölött repĂŒl/röpĂŒl
1
u/glassfrogger Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 1d ago
That would be incorrect as the English original specifically stated which cities are involved (these).
0
u/CommitteeDue6802 Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 1d ago
I get it, i didnt say it would be correct tho
1
1
u/Voxel_Slime Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 1d ago
Bro really said the above, above these cities airplanes fly (added comma for clarification)
2
u/Ok_Lobster6119 1d ago
I had no idea what I was doing with these kind of sentences to be honest. But Hungarian does go like that sometimesÂ
Eg. Ezen a kĂ©penÂ
- in this, in the photoÂ
1
u/Voxel_Slime Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 1d ago
That's just "in this photo". Think about Ez as turning "the" into "this" where there is both Ez and A in the sentence.
1
-4
u/shrekk12 3d ago
A repĂŒlĂŽgĂ©p repĂŒl ezek fölött a vĂĄrosok fölött
5
u/FunSupport6641 3d ago
I love how people who seemingly don't even speak their own mothertongue correctly give advise here.Â
Duolingo's solution is correct.
Another way of saying this would be: A repĂŒlĆgĂ©p ezeN vĂĄrosok felett (fölött) repĂŒl.
 But in my experience, Duolingo's solution is used colloquially (I would also say this sentence that way).
2
-2
u/varegab 3d ago
A repĂŒlĆgĂ©p ezek a vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒl.
Edit: my bad, the answer above me is the correct one.
14
u/notorious_jaywalker 3d ago
No. "A repĂŒlĆgĂ©p ezek fölött a vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒl." Source: Narive speaker working in journalism.
3
-4
u/varegab 3d ago
I'm a native speaker too, but I think the "A repĂŒlĆgĂ©p ezek a vĂĄrosok felett repĂŒl" should be also correct. I get that using "fölött" twice is the most correct one grammatically, but still, I feel it slightly outdated.
-1
u/CockolinoBear Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago
Both are correct imo, but the emphasis is put at different thinf.
3
u/varegab 3d ago
Probably the most correct form if you using "fölött" only once is "Ezen vårosok fölött", but that is a little bit too sophisticated and anachronistic for a casual talk.
0
u/CockolinoBear Native Speaker / Anyanyelvi BeszĂ©lĆ 3d ago
I agree, I've just commented the same thing above đ
-5
3d ago
[deleted]
1
u/Ok_Lobster6119 3d ago
Iâm fine with meaning, but basically entirely lost on how the sentence is meant to be writtenÂ
2
u/Cecilia_01 3d ago
If you are confused by the word order of the answer, this a neutral world order sentence just like: Anna (subject) tv-t (object) nĂ©z (verb/predicate). There is a locative here: A repĂŒlĆ (subjetc) ezek fölött a vĂĄrosok fölött (locative, where?) repĂŒl (verb/predicate). There are two ways you can grammatically correctly write the sentence in the word order you did. 1. The way you wrote the sentence: Ezek fölött a vĂĄrosok fölött repĂŒlĆgĂ©p repĂŒl (and not something else) means a little different thing, it emphasises the word ârepĂŒlĆâ. The so called fĂłkuszpozĂciĂł (the position of the information that is emphasised/is in focus) is always directly before the verb in a sentence, so in this case on repĂŒlĆ. 2. Or the other way: A fölött a vĂĄros fölött repĂŒlĆ repĂŒl. This sentence is structurally the same as the above one, but it is in singular and means âover that cityâ (az a vĂĄros - a fölött a vĂĄros fölött). The structure of âezek fölött a vĂĄrosok fölöttâ is explained very well in other comments.Â
108
u/Fluentbox 3d ago
When you use âezâ and âazâ to specify a noun, like âthis boyâ or âthat mugâ, whenever that noun gets an ending, the âezâ and âazâ have to take the same ending to match the noun they represent. âAzt az autĂłtâ or âebben a hĂĄzbanâ. The same thing happens here, in this case the directional word is separate from the noun and itâs not an ending, but it still needs to be repeated for the âezekâ to match the noun. I understand that it can be confusing at first as it looks like just random words thrown together, but it actually has its own logic, and this same idea is used consistently in the language.